Bibliographie complète

Floods, intensified by climate change, pose major challenges for flood zone management in Quebec. This report addresses these issues through two complementary aspects: a historical analysis of the evolution of flood zone management in Quebec and the projected impact of the cartographic and regulatory overhaul, as well as an exploration of the imaginary surrounding the flood-prone territory of the city of Lachute, which has faced recurrent floods for decades and yet continues to be inhabited. The historical analysis reveals that the major floods of 1974, 1976, 2017, and 2019 marked significant turning points in Quebec’s risk management, particularly by highlighting gaps in the regulatory framework and flood zone mapping. The adoption of the Act Respecting Land Use Planning and Development (LAU) in 1979 and the Policy for the Protection of Shorelines, Littorals, and Floodplains (PPRLPI) in 1987 represented a shift toward a preventive approach. However, inconsistencies, insufficient updates to maps, and uneven enforcement of standards have hindered their effectiveness. The catastrophic floods of 2017 and 2019 triggered a regulatory overhaul, a modernization of mapping, and measures to strengthen community resilience. In 2022, a transitional regime came into effect to tighten the regulation of activities in flood zones, pending the adoption of a risk-based management framework. However, to this day, the regulatory perimeters proposed in the modernization project fail to account for the adaptive capacities deployed by communities to live with water, thus providing a biased interpretation of flood risk. The second part explores the social and cultural representations associated with Lachute’s flood-prone territory. It highlights the complex relationships that have developed between residents and the Rivière du Nord through successive flooding episodes and the adaptation strategies implemented to cope, particularly by those who have repeatedly experienced flooding. These residents have come to live with overflow events and to (co)exist with water, challenging the persistent notion that flood-prone areas are inherently dangerous. While local strategies are sometimes innovative, they remain constrained by a regulatory framework that disregards the human experience of the territory and the specific ways in which people inhabit exposed areas to learn to manage flood risks. In summary, this report underscores the urgency of a territorialized, risk-based approach to modernizing flood zone management. It also highlights the need to look beyond cartographic boundaries and better integrate human and cultural dimensions into planning policies, as illustrated in the case of Lachute, to more accurately reflect the true level of risk. These reflections aim to promote more coherent, sustainable, and acceptable management, planning, and development of exposed territories in response to the growing challenges posed by climate change.

DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.14812111