Votre recherche

Coastal socio-ecological systems are complex adaptive systems with nonlinear changing properties and multi-scale dynamics. They are influenced by unpredictable coastal hazards accentuated by the effects of climate change, and they can quickly be altered if critical thresholds are crossed. Additional pressures come from coastal activities and development, both of which attracting stakeholders with different perspectives and interests. While coastal defence measures (CDMs) have been implemented to mitigate coastal hazards for centuries, a lack of knowledge and tools available to make informed decision has led to coastal managers favouring the choice of seawalls or rock armours with little consideration for socio-ecological systems features, and stakeholders’ priorities. Though it is not currently widely applied in coastal zone management, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a tool that can be useful to facilitate decision making. PROMETHEE, an outranking method, was chosen to support the multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of CDMs in the context of four study sites characterized by distinct environmental features. The aim was to determine the relevance and benefits of a MCDA by integrating coastal zone stakeholders in a participatory decision-making process in order to select CDMs that are better adapted to the whole socio-ecological system. First, in a series of five workshops, stakeholders were asked to identify and weigh criteria that were relevant to their local conditions. Second and third, CDMs were evaluated in relation to each criterion within the local context, then, hierarchized. Initial results show that vegetation came first in three of the four sites, while rock armour ranked first in the fourth site. A post-evaluation of the participatory process indicated that the weighting phase is an effective way to integrate local knowledge into the decision-making process, but the identification of criteria could be streamlined by the presentation of a predefined list from which participants could make a selection. This would ensure criteria that are standardized, and in a format that is compatible with the MCDA. Coupled with a participatory process MCDA proved to be a flexible methodology that can synthetize multiple aspects of the problem, and contribute in a meaningful way to the coastal engineering and management decision-making process.

L’objectif de cette recherche est d’identifier les stratégies d’adaptation qui sont requises et du ressort d’une municipalité régionale de comté face aux inondations. Le réchauffement global des températures soulève plusieurs inquiétudes quant à la modification du cycle hydrologique. Les inondations figurent en tête de liste des enjeux de sécurité civile des municipalités riveraines. Au Québec, on prévoit une augmentation des précipitations printanières, automnales et hivernales, ainsi que des débits hivernaux plus élevés et un devancement des crues printanières. Des projections qui peuvent influencer l’approche de gestion des barrages, bien que le contrôle des niveaux d’eau ne soit pas une panacée vis-à-vis des inondations. Il suppose une gestion intégrée de l’eau parfois complexe. Aussi, les administrations locales ne siègent pas toujours aux comités responsables de la régularisation des cours d’eau. Celles-ci se retrouvent sur la ligne de front sans pour autant avoir le pouvoir et les ressources financières pour y faire face. Les crues exceptionnelles de 2017 et 2019 ont conduit la Municipalité régionale de comté de Vaudreuil-Soulanges à mettre à jour ses plans d’urgence et à mettre en place une cellule de crise. Elle applique une stratégie d’adaptation correspondant aux 4 axes du Plan de protection du territoire face aux inondations du ministère des Affaires municipales et de l’Habitation. Ces outils enrichissent leur capacité d’adaptation par l’acquisition de nouvelles connaissances et d’une nouvelle cartographie des zones inondables. Les vulnérabilités qui résultent de contraintes liées à l’aménagement du territoire, ainsi que d’enjeux réglementaires posent un défi pour le développement du territoire et la relocalisation de résidences inondées. Il convient de sonder la population sur sa vision de la résilience afin d’assurer une meilleure acceptabilité sociale des décisions à venir. Une vulnérabilité importante réside dans les écarts de perception du risque entre les municipalités et entre les individus ; ce qui engendre des enjeux de sécurité, de communication et de gouvernance. Les instances locales peuvent miser sur leurs habiletés de mobilisation pour réunir la communauté autour du développement d’un plan d’adaptation aux changements climatiques et ainsi harmoniser les perceptions. Finalement, l’épuisement des ressources humaines des municipalités inondées à répétition est à considérer. Il appert qu’il est essentiel d’identifier et de mettre en place les outils et ressources pour les soutenir.

Abstract Homeowners around the world elevate houses to manage flood risks. Deciding how high to elevate a house poses a nontrivial decision problem. The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recommends elevating existing houses to the Base Flood Elevation (the elevation of the 100-year flood) plus a freeboard. This recommendation neglects many uncertainties. Here we analyze a case-study of riverine flood risk management using a multi-objective robust decision-making framework in the face of deep uncertainties. While the quantitative results are location-specific, the approach and overall insights are generalizable. We find strong interactions between the economic, engineering, and Earth science uncertainties, illustrating the need for expanding on previous integrated analyses to further understand the nature and strength of these connections. Considering deep uncertainties surrounding flood hazards, the discount rate, the house lifetime, and the fragility can increase the economically optimal house elevation to values well above FEMA’s recommendation.

Parler d’inclusion démocratique, c’est chercher à impliquer les citoyen.ne.s dans les processus de prise de décision des organes politiques. Évidemment la première question qui vient, c’est celle de savoir comment le faire. Cette tâche complexe se joue sur de multiples échelles : au niveau national, au niveau des provinces ou des états, des régions, des villes; […]

Abstract High-resolution global flood risk maps are increasingly used to inform disaster risk planning and response, particularly in lower income countries with limited data or capacity. However, current approaches do not adequately account for spatial variation in social vulnerability, which is a key determinant of variation in outcomes for exposed populations. Here we integrate annual average exceedance probability estimates from a high-resolution fluvial flood model with gridded population and poverty data to create a global vulnerability-adjusted risk index for flooding (VARI Flood) at 90-meter resolution. The index provides estimates of relative risk within or between countries and changes how we understand the geography of risk by identifying ‘hotspots’ characterised by high population density and high levels of social vulnerability. This approach, which emphasises risks to human well-being, could be used as a complement to traditional population or asset-centred approaches.

IntroductionCaribbean Small island developing states (SIDS) are generally qualified as disproportionately vulnerable to climate change, including extreme weather events like hurricanes. While many studies already documented the impacts of climate change on health in the wealthiest countries, there is little knowledge in this field in Caribbean SIDS. Our study aims to discuss health risks and vulnerabilities in a Caribbean context to inform future adaptation measures to climate change.MethodsOur paper is based on a qualitative study that was conducted in Dominica, a Caribbean SIDS. The data come from semi-structured interviews organized between March 2020 and January 2021 with people internally displaced following an extreme climate event, either tropical storm Erika (2015) or Hurricane Maria (2017), and with some people who migrated to Guadeloupe after Hurricane Maria. Interview guides were based on conceptual frameworks on climate change, migration and health, and vulnerability to climate change. Data were analyzed deductively based on frameworks and inductively to allow new codes to emerge.ResultsOur findings suggest that current knowledge of climate change by those who have been displaced by an extreme climate event varied greatly depending on the education level, class, and socioeconomic condition of the participant. Participants experienced various negative consequences from a storm or hurricane such as increased risk of relocation, lack of access to healthcare, and food, job, and water insecurities – all circumstances know to correlate with mental health issues. Participants suggested stronger dwellings, community preparedness committees to act sooner, and climate change sensitization and awareness campaigns to foster community unity and solidarity.ConclusionThese findings contribute to the perspectives and knowledge of climate change, highlighting that existing extreme climate event committees and government officials need to address structural and social barriers that can potentially increase social inequalities and lead to maladaptation to climate change with potential consequences on public health.

The global impacts of river floods are substantial and rising. Effective adaptation to the increasing risks requires an in-depth understanding of the physical and socioeconomic drivers of risk. Whereas the modeling of flood hazard and exposure has improved greatly, compelling evidence on spatiotemporal patterns in vulnerability of societies around the world is still lacking. Due to this knowledge gap, the effects of vulnerability on global flood risk are not fully understood, and future projections of fatalities and losses available today are based on simplistic assumptions or do not include vulnerability. We show for the first time (to our knowledge) that trends and fluctuations in vulnerability to river floods around the world can be estimated by dynamic high-resolution modeling of flood hazard and exposure. We find that rising per-capita income coincided with a global decline in vulnerability between 1980 and 2010, which is reflected in decreasing mortality and losses as a share of the people and gross domestic product exposed to inundation. The results also demonstrate that vulnerability levels in low- and high-income countries have been converging, due to a relatively strong trend of vulnerability reduction in developing countries. Finally, we present projections of flood losses and fatalities under 100 individual scenario and model combinations, and three possible global vulnerability scenarios. The projections emphasize that materialized flood risk largely results from human behavior and that future risk increases can be largely contained using effective disaster risk reduction strategies.