Assessing the influence of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on discharge variability in western North America

The frequency of natural hazards in North America presents a significant challenge for governments due to the damages they cause to the environment. Floods are severe hydrological events caused by spring snowmelt and intense rain events. Flood frequency analysis studies assumes that annual peak flood events occur independently of each other, regardless of previous flood events (the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption); however, annual peak flood records do not necessarily appear to conform to these assumptions. First, a review of the literature on the effects of climate oscillations on extreme flood frequencies in North America was conducted. Then, the i.i.d. flood event assumption was tested by analyzing the effects of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) on 250 naturally flowing annual peak flood records across the entire western North American margin. Using permutation tests on quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots, I found that the PDO has a greater impact on the magnitude of annual peak floods than the AMO. Twenty-six percent of the gauges have higher magnitude annual floods depending on the PDO phase (p < 0.1). Next, I examined the interacting effects of the PDO and AMO on the frequencies of lower and upper quartile annual peak floods, and found reinforcing, cancelling, and dominating effects. Since these two climate oscillations have significant effects on the magnitudes of annual peak floods, the i.i.d. assumption does not hold. Hence, I advocate for the need to re-assess baseline flood analysis in western North America to improve flood management strategies.