Votre recherche
Résultats 3 ressources
-
Flooding is the most frequent natural disaster in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB), causing significant socio-economic damages. In recent decades, abundant wetland resources in the YRB have experienced substantial changes and played a significant role in strengthening the hydrological resilience to flood risks. However, wetland-related approaches remain underdeveloped for mitigating flood risks in the YRB due to the lack of considering long-term wetland effects in the flood risk assessment. Therefore, this study develops an wetland-related GIS-based spatial multi-index flood risk assessment model by incorporating the effects of wetland variations, to investigate the long-term implications of wetland variations on flood risks, to identify dominant flood risk indicators under wetland effects, and to provide wetland-related flood risk management suggestions. These findings indicate that wetlands in the Taihu Lake Basin, Wanjiang Plain, Poyang Lake Basin, and Dongting and Honghu Lake Basin could enhance flood control capacity and reduce flood risks in most years between 1985 and 2021 except years with extreme flood disasters. Wetlands in the Sichuan Basin have aggravated but limited impacts on flood risks. Precipitation in the Taihu Lake Basin and Poyang Lake Basin, runoff and vegetation cover in the Wanjiang Plain, GDP in the Taihu Lake Basin, population density in the Taihu lake Basin, Dongting and Honghu Lake Basin, and the Sichuan Basin are dominant flood risk indicators under wetland effects. Reasonably managing wetlands, maximizing stormwater storage capacity, increasing vegetation coverage in urbanized and precipitated regions are feasible suggestions for developing wetland-related flood resilience strategies in the YRB. © 2025 The Authors
-
Urban flood disasters pose substantial threats to public safety and urban development, with climate change exacerbating the intensity, frequency, and consequences of such events. While existing research has predominantly concentrated on flood control and disaster response, limited attention has been paid to the underlying drivers and evolutionary mechanisms of urban flood resilience. This study applies the resilience framework to develop an integrated methodology for assessing urban flood resilience. Focusing on three coastal provinces in China that frequently experience severe flooding, the study identifies fifteen key resilience drivers to construct a compound driver system. The evolution of flood resilience is examined through the lens of the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model, which categorizes the drivers into three distinct dimensions. The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretative Structural Model (ISM) methods are employed to analyze the interrelationships and hierarchical structure among drivers. In parallel, a system dynamics (SD) modeling approach is used to construct causal-loop and stock-flow diagrams, revealing the complex interdependencies and critical pathways across resilience dimensions. The analysis identifies rainfall intensity as the most influential driver in shaping urban flood resilience. Scenario simulations based on the SD model explore variations in resilience performance under three developmental pathways. Findings suggest that enhancing response resilience is crucial under current flood control trajectories. This study contributes novel conceptual and methodological insights into the measurement and evolution of urban flood resilience. It offers actionable guidance for policymakers aiming to strengthen flood risk governance and urban safety. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd
-
Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme floods in the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB). This study leverages the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to evaluate its performance in predicting river discharge across the LMB and to identify the key variables contributing to flood prediction through SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) and Universal Multifractal (UM) analyses, in a scale-dependent and scale-independent manner, respectively. The performance of the LSTM model is satisfactory, with Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values exceeding 0.9 for all subbasins when using all input features. The model tends to underestimate the largest peak flows in the midstream subbasins that experienced extreme rainfall events. According to SHAP, soil-related variables are important contributors to discharge prediction, with their impacts partially manifested through interactions with precipitation and runoff. Furthermore, the dominant contributing variables influencing flood prediction vary over time: soil-related variables and vegetation-related variables played a more significant role in earlier years, whereas hydrometeorological variables became more dominant after 2017. The UM analysis investigates the scaling behaviours of contributing variables, showing that hydrometeorological-related variables have a greater influence on predicting extreme discharge across the small temporal scales. Additionally, the UM analysis indicates that the model's performance improves as the temporal variability in extremes of the combined features decreases across 1 to 16 days. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the LSTM model's performance in discharge prediction, emphasising the impact of the variability in the extremes of combined features through the scale-independent interpretation. These findings will offer valuable insights for stakeholders to improve flood risk management across the LMB. © 2025 The Authors