Votre recherche
Résultats 3 ressources
-
The Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ET0) formulation was forced with humidity, radiation, and wind speed (HRW) fields simulated by four reanalyses in order to simulate hydrologic processes over six mid-sized nivo-pluvial watersheds in southern Quebec, Canada. The resulting simulated hydrologic response is comparable to an empirical ET0 formulation based exclusively on air temperature. However, Penman-Montheith provides a sounder representation of the existing relations between evapotranspiration fluctuations and climate drivers. Correcting HRW fields significantly improves the hydrologic bias over the pluvial period (June to November). The latter did not translate into an increase of the hydrologic performance according to the Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) metric. The suggested approach allows for the implementation of physically-based ET0 formulations where HRW observations are insufficient for the calibration and validation of hydrologic models and a potential reinforcement of the confidence affecting the projection of low flow regimes and water availability.
-
Snowmelt dominated regions are receiving increasing attention due to their noticeably rapid response to ongoing climate change, which raises concerns about the altered hydrological risks under climate change scenarios. This study aims to assess the climate change impacts on hydrology over two contrasted catchments in southern Québec: Acadie River and Montmorency River catchments. These river catchments represent two predominant landscapes of the St. Lawrence River watershed; an intensive farming landscape in the south shore lowlands and the forested landscape on the Canadian Shield on the north shore, respectively. In this study, a physically based hydrological model has been developed using the Cold Regions Hydrological Model (CRHM) for both of the catchments. The hydrological model outputs showed that we were able to simulate snow surveys and discharge measurements with a reasonable accuracy for both catchments. The acceptable performance of the model along with the strong physical basis of structure suggested that this model could be used for climate change sensitivity simulations. Based on the climate scenarios reviewed, a temperature increase up to 8°C and an increase in total precipitation up to 20% were analysed for both of the catchments. Both catchments were found to be sensitive to climate change, however the degree of sensitivity was found to be catchment specific. Snow processes in the Acadie River catchment were simulated to be more sensitive to warming than in the Montmorency River catchment. In case of 2°C warming, reduction in peak SWE was not be able to be compensated even by increased precipitation scenario. Given that, the Acadie River has already a mixed flow regime, even if 2°C warming is combined with an increase in precipitation, pluvial regime kept becoming more dominant, resulting in higher peaks of rain events. On the other hand, even 3°C of warming did not modify the flow regime of the Montmorency River. While there is shift towards earlier peak spring flows in both catchments, the shift was found to be more pronounced in the Acadie River. An earlier occurrence of snowmelt floods and an overall increase in winter streamflow during winter have been simulated for both catchments, which calls for renewed assessments of existing water supply and flood risk management strategies.