Votre recherche

Abstract. In response to the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC), flood hazard maps are currently produced all over Europe, reflecting a wider shift in focus from "flood protection" to "risk management", for which not only public authorities but also populations at risk are seen as responsible. By providing a visual image of the foreseen consequences of flooding, flood hazard maps can enhance people's knowledge about flood risk, making them more capable of an adequate response. Current literature, however, questions the maps' awareness raising capacity, arguing that their content and design are rarely adjusted to laypeople's needs. This paper wants to complement this perspective with a focus on risk communication by studying how these tools are disseminated and marketed to the public in the first place. Judging from communication theory, simply making hazard maps publicly available is unlikely to lead to attitudinal or behavioral effects, since this typically requires two-way communication and material or symbolic incentives. Consequently, it is relevant to investigate whether and how local risk managers, who are well positioned to interact with the local population, make use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes. A qualitative case study of this issue in the German state of Baden-Württemberg suggests that many municipalities lack a clear strategy for using this new information tool for hazard and risk communication. Four barriers in this regard are identified: perceived disinterest/sufficient awareness on behalf of the population at risk; unwillingness to cause worry or distress; lack of skills and resources; and insufficient support. These barriers are important to address – in research as well as in practice – since it is only if flood hazard maps are used to enhance local knowledge resources that they can be expected to contribute to social capacity building.

Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer‐reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood‐risk perception and flood‐risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.

Abstract. This paper examines the development over historical time of the meaning and uses of the term resilience. The objective is to deepen our understanding of how the term came to be adopted in disaster risk reduction and resolve some of the conflicts and controversies that have arisen when it has been used. The paper traces the development of resilience through the sciences, humanities, and legal and political spheres. It considers how mechanics passed the word to ecology and psychology, and how from there it was adopted by social research and sustainability science. As other authors have noted, as a concept, resilience involves some potentially serious conflicts or contradictions, for example between stability and dynamism, or between dynamic equilibrium (homeostasis) and evolution. Moreover, although the resilience concept works quite well within the confines of general systems theory, in situations in which a systems formulation inhibits rather than fosters explanation, a different interpretation of the term is warranted. This may be the case for disaster risk reduction, which involves transformation rather than preservation of the "state of the system". The article concludes that the modern conception of resilience derives benefit from a rich history of meanings and applications, but that it is dangerous – or at least potentially disappointing – to read to much into the term as a model and a paradigm.

Plus aucune communauté n’est à l’abri des catastrophes naturelles et technologiques et de plus en plus les intervenants du domaine du social sont appelés à intervenir lors de ces situations. Malheureusement, plusieurs d’entre eux interviennent pendant et après une catastrophe sans avoir reçu une formation de base sur l’intervention en situation de crise macrosociale. Pourtant, ce type d’intervention exige des habiletés de base qui doivent s’acquérir à la fois dans les maisons d’enseignement et lors de formations continues. De plus, en cas de désastre naturels ou technologiques, certains groupes d’individus, dont les personnes âgées, sont plus vulnérables que d’autres parce qu’elles n’ont pas facilement accès aux ressources de la communauté. Par exemple, plusieurs personnes âgées, surtout celles présentant des incapacités physiques ou cognitives et celles à faible revenu n’ont, en général, pas de voitures à leur disponibilité, ce qui peut nuire à leur évacuation lors d’inondations, de tremblements de terre ou d’ouragans. De plus, plusieurs aînés habitent dans de vieux logements moins bien construits pour faire face à des chocs de toutes sortes. Les personnes âgées et particulièrement celles présentant des incapacités physiques ou cognitives, celles à faibles revenus ou sans réseau de soutien social font parties des groupes à risque de subir des blessures, de mourir ou de développer des problèmes de santé post-désastre. Le décès d’un nombre important de personnes âgées pendant l’ouragan Katrina et la vague de chaleur de l’été 2003 en Europe, a malheureusement démontré que plusieurs communautés sont très mal préparées à protéger et secourir, en cas de catastrophe, les aînés et plus particulièrement les personnes âgées vulnérables. De plus, plusieurs études ont fait ressortir qu’à la suite d’un désastre, les personnes âgées reçoivent proportionnellement moins d’aide que les personnes plus jeunes (Fernandez et al 2002), soit parce qu’elles ne sont pas priorisées par les autorités locales ou parce qu’elles-mêmes hésitent à informer leurs proches et les organismes publics ou communautaires de leurs besoins de soutien. Tout individu, quel que soit son âge a un important besoin de soutien social pendant et après un désastre afin d’atténuer les effets du stress et surmonter les obstacles qui se présenteront. On pense par exemple à l’interruption des services essentiels comme l’eau potable ou l’électricité, la lourdeur démocratique, l’endettement, les négociations avec des entrepreneurs quelque peu malhonnêtes, etc. À ce sujet, plusieurs chercheurs considèrent les désastres comme une suite d’événements stressants pouvant occasionner de nombreuses difficultés aux individus (Murphy, 1986). Cette communication permettra de présenter les résultats de nos études effectuées sur les conséquences des désastres sur la santé physique et psychologique des aînés ainsi que sur divers aspects de leur vie (vie personnelle, conjugale, familiale et sociale). En explicitant les sentiments et les difficultés que ces personnes éprouvent lors de catastrophes, les intervenants du domaine du social seront alors mieux outiller pour intervenir auprès de ce groupe cible. Cette communication a donc pour but de présenter les principaux faits saillants et les recommandations de la recension des écrits scientifiques que nous avons dernièrement complété et des faits saillants des diverses études que nous avons réalisées jusqu’à maintenant auprès des personnes âgées à la suite de deux types de désastres : inondation et tempête de verglas. Cette communication a pour but de sensibiliser les participants à l’importance de tenir compte, pour les intervenants du social, des spécificités des aînés lors de l’application des mesures d’urgence et lors de la période de rétablissement des communautés.

Abstract While flood risk management planning in the U nited S tates has focused on flood control structures designed to protect the economic value of property, it has consistently undervalued other social impacts associated with flooding. The US A rmy C orps of E ngineers ( USACE ) recently initiated research aimed at understanding how to incorporate social characteristics into the measures currently utilised in flood control project evaluation and consideration. This paper proposes a methodology for incorporating a known measure of social vulnerability, the S ocial V ulnerability I ndex ( SoVI ), into USACE civil works planning. Using the USACE S outh A tlantic D ivision as the study area, this paper evaluates eight different variations of the social vulnerability metric and their potential deployment in USACE projects. Each formulation is compared with the original‐computed SoVI as a means to test its spatial and statistical sensitivity, including an assessment of each variant's robustness, reducibility, scalability, and transferability. Results indicate that while it is possible to create simplified, yet robust, versions of SoVI for individual places, such ‘lite’ metrics tend to fall short in areas of scalability and transferability in relation to the original SoVI formulation.