Votre recherche

Abstract Streamflow sensitivity to different hydrologic processes varies in both space and time. This sensitivity is traditionally evaluated for the parameters specific to a given hydrologic model simulating streamflow. In this study, we apply a novel analysis over more than 3000 basins across North America considering a blended hydrologic model structure, which includes not only parametric, but also structural uncertainties. This enables seamless quantification of model process sensitivities and parameter sensitivities across a continuous set of models. It also leads to high-level conclusions about the importance of water cycle components on streamflow predictions, such as quickflow being the most sensitive process for streamflow simulations across the North American continent. The results of the 3000 basins are used to derive an approximation of sensitivities based on physiographic and climatologic data without the need to perform expensive sensitivity analyses. Detailed spatio-temporal inputs and results are shared through an interactive website.

Abstract A warmer climate impacts streamflows and these changes need to be quantified to assess future risk, vulnerability, and to implement efficient adaptation measures. The climate simulations from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which have been the basis of most such assessments over the past decade, are being gradually superseded by the more recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Our study portrays the added value of the CMIP6 ensemble over CMIP5 in a first North America wide comparison using 3,107 catchments. Results show a reduced spread of the CMIP6 ensemble compared to the CMIP5 ensemble for temperature and precipitation projections. In terms of flow indicators, the CMIP6 driven hydrological projections result in a smaller spread of future mean and high flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that the CMIP6 ensemble provides a narrower band of uncertainty of future climate projections, bringing more confidence for hydrological impact studies. , Plain Language Summary Greenhouse gas emissions are causing the climate to warm significantly, which in turn impacts flows in rivers worldwide. To adapt to these changes, it is essential to quantify them and assess future risk and vulnerability. Climate models are the primary tools used to achieve this. The main data set that provides scientists with state‐of‐the‐art climate model simulations is known as the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The fifth phase of that project (CMIP5) has been used over the past decade in multiple hydrological studies to assess the impacts of climate change on streamflow. The more recent sixth phase (CMIP6) has started to generate projections, which brings the following question: is it necessary to update the hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the new CMIP6 models? To answer this question, a comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 using 3,107 catchments over North America was conducted. Results show that there is less spread in temperature and precipitation projections for CMIP6. This translates into a smaller spread of future mean, high and low flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that using the CMIP6 data set would provide a more concerted range of future climate projections, leading to more confident hydrological impact studies. , Key Points A comparison of hydrological impacts using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 5 (CMIP5) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) ensembles is performed over 3,107 catchments in North America The CMIP6 ensembles provide a narrower band of uncertainty for hydrological indicators in the future It is recommended to update hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the CMIP6 ensemble

La modélisation numérique des estuaires hypertidaux intéresse particulièrement les ingénieurs impliqués dans la navigation maritime et le développement de projets d'énergie marémotrice. Au Québec (Canada), la majorité de ces estuaires à marée extrême sont situés dans des régions isolée de l'Arctique canadien et sont souvent des lieux de résidence des communautés autochtones du Nord canadien. La présente thèse vise à mieux comprendre les processus se manifestent dans ces environnements, avec une emphase particulière sur l'importance (1) de la forte dominance des marées, (2) de l'extrême variabilité bathymétrique et (3) de l'immense forçage climatique. La thèse tente de démontrer comment les modèles numériques peuvent être utilisés pour traiter ces particularités et peuvent être la meilleure méthode disponible pour étudier leurs effets dans des environnements éloignés peu étudies. Premièrement, dans le but d'évaluer le potentiel de courant de marée en eau libre (sans glace) de l'estuaire hypertidal de la rivière Koksoak (KRE), nous avons modélisé le débit de marée en utilisant un model numérique hydrodynamique réputé (Delft3D). Différents aspects de l'hydrodynamique côtière ont été étudiés grâce à la modélisation numérique 1D2D-3D. La variabilité spatio-temporelle de la densité de puissance hydrocinétique disponible a ensuite été quantifiée. Les résultats ont révélé l'énorme potentiel (1000 MW) d'énergie marémotrice présente à plusieurs endroits le long de l'estuaire, ce qui nécessite des études numériques plus approfondies. En mettant davantage l'accent sur la modélisation numérique du site, par exemple la publication d'un Atlas des courants de marée pour aider à la navigation maritime dans le KRE, nous avons constaté que certains problèmes de modélisation des estuaires n'étaient pas abordés. Compte tenu des conditions limites précises et des mesures in situ recueillies au cours de l'hiver 2017-2018, nous avons constaté que les meilleurs résultats pour l'étalonnage du modèle (niveau d'eau) en utilisant les paramètres/options disponibles conduisaient encore à certains ordres d'imprécision. sur les conditions aux limites de formse qualité (campagnes 2017-2018) qui ont effectivement amélioré les résultats numériques, nous avons constaté que les meilleurs résultats pour l'étalonnage du modèle (niveau d'eau) en utilisant les paramètres/options disponibles étaient encore associés à certains ordres d'imprécision. Par conséquent, l'objectif du deuxième travail était d'améliorer l'efficacité de la modélisation hydrodynamique pour les environnements de marée peu profonde. Nous avons introduit quelques hypothèses décrivant pourquoi les modèles de turbulence et de rugosité disponibles ne sont pas bien adaptés à la modélisation des estuaires avec de fortes variabilités spatiales et temporelles des profondeurs de marée. En conséquence (i) un modèle de turbulence k-ε étendu pour la paramétrisation adaptative de la viscosité turbulente en fonction de la profondeur, et une approche basée sur la direction de l'écoulement pour la paramétrisation de la rugosité du lit ont été développés, incorporés dans le modèle hydrodynamique employé (Delft3D). Le modèle modifié a montré une amélioration constante des prévisions du modèle dans les stations de champ proche et de champ lointain, par rapport aux schémas de paramétrage classiques. Enfin, un aspect manquant et mal compris des estuaires de latitude nordique est l'immense impact de l'hiver sur le flux des marées. Situé à la latitude 58°, le KRE subit l'effet intensif du climat arctique pendant la majeure partie de l'année, ce qui entraîne la formation de glace estuarienne rapide sur une grande partie de sa longueur. Plus précisément, et ce qui est le plus pertinent pour cette recherche, il est important de savoir comment le long hiver affecte les potentiels hydrocinétiques des estuaires des régions froides. Ainsi, la surfusion entraîne la formation de frasil et de glace de fond qui peuvent adhérer aux pales des turbines et provoquer leur dysfonctionnement. Dans les estuaires, la surfusion a une nature transitoire complexe car le point de congélation de l'eau salée est une fonction de la salinité et de la profondeur qui est changée par les marées au cours des cycles de marée. En raison du manque de données de terrain en hiver, nous avons collecté des paramètres hydrodynamiques en utilisant de nouvelles campagne de mesures en hiver 2018. Les observations ont montré que le risque de surfusion diminue à l'intérieur de l'estuaire, car en l'absence de débit fluvial, la salinité peut s'infiltrer beaucoup plus loin dans le fleuve. À l'intérieur, une modulation apparente de ∆T (la différence entre la température de l'eau et la température de congélation de l'eau), dépendant de la marée, a été observée avec une augmentation de la température pendant des marées montantes. Cette augmentation retarderait la surfusion, ce qui est un avantage majeur pour turbines. En réglant le module Delft3D-Ice, différents scénarios ont été définis pour l'étendue et l'épaisseur de la couvert de glace, et leurs réponses hydrodynamiques ont été analysées. Il a été démontré que la glace a des impacts complexes et non uniformes sur les caractéristiques hydrodynamiques de la KRE. Surtout, le débit des prismes de marée, qui est la principale source d'élan, peut être modifiée de manière démonstrative par la couverture de glace et la glace de marée plate. Les résultats suggèrent que les zones énergétiques sont légèrement affectées par la glace pendant la plus grande partie de l'hiver. Pendant l'hiver de pointe seulement, la glace pourrait considérablement diminuer densité moyenne de puissance des courants (par exemple, la puissance moyenne est égale ou supérieure à 7 kW m-2). Ces implications cryohydrodynamiques indiquent que l'hiver arctique n'est pas un obstacle à la production d'électricité dans le fleuve Koksoak, et l'énergie marémotrice serait un avantage annuel pour Kuujjuaq

Hydrological systems are naturally complex and nonlinear. A large number of variables, many of which not yet well considered in regional frequency analysis (RFA), have a significant impact on hydrological dynamics and consequently on flood quantile estimates. Despite the increasing number of statistical tools used to estimate flood quantiles at ungauged sites, little attention has been dedicated to the development of new regional estimation (RE) models accounting for both nonlinear links and interactions between hydrological and physio-meteorological variables. The aim of this paper is to simultaneously take into account nonlinearity and interactions between variables by introducing the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) approach in RFA. The predictive performances of MARS are compared with those obtained by one of the most robust RE models: the generalized additive model (GAM). Both approaches are applied to two datasets covering 151 hydrometric stations in the province of Quebec (Canada): a standard dataset (STA) containing commonly used variables and an extended dataset (EXTD) combining STA with additional variables dealing with drainage network characteristics. Results indicate that RE models using MARS with the EXTD outperform slightly RE models using GAM. Thus, MARS seems to allow for a better representation of the hydrological process and an increased predictive power in RFA.

Whether disasters influence adaptation actions in cities is contested. Yet, the extant knowledge base primarily consists of single or small-N case studies, so there is no global overview of the evidence on disaster impacts and adaptation. Here, we use regression analysis to explore the effects of disaster frequency and severity on four adaptation action types in 549 cities. In countries with greater adaptive capacity, economic losses increase city-level actions targeting recently experienced disaster event types, as well as actions to strengthen general disaster preparedness. An increase in disaster frequency reduces actions targeting hazard types other than those that recently occurred, while human losses have few effects. Comparisons between cities across levels of adaptive capacity indicate a wealth effect. More affluent countries incur greater economic damages from disasters, but also have higher governance capacity, creating both incentives and opportunities for adaptation measures. While disaster frequency and severity had a limited impact on adaptation actions overall, results are sensitive to which disaster impacts, adaptation action types, and adaptive capacities are considered.

This contribution proposes an inter-scalar and multi-polar analysis evaluation model of the territory of the Enna district, aimed at providing a robust axiological representation of the salient aspects of the general issue of internal areas, and therefore of the set of criticalities affecting them from the perspective of the human and urban capital they express. In the prospect of investigating the relations between urban and life quality – corresponding to the “city effect” – in the territorial context of each of the 20 municipalities of the Enna district, a hierarchical descriptive-valuation model was created, which coordinates a relevant amount of information units (data) and the corresponding attributes, indicators and indices that have been turned in aggregate value judgments attributed to each administrative land unit, from the perspectives of the criteria referred to as the main forms of the territorial capital. This is a multi-dimensional valuation model based on the Multi-Attribute Value Theory. Each survey and processing is mapped with different levels of detail at the scale of municipalities, census sections and cadastral land units. The outcome of this complex process of analysis and assessment provides multiple comparisons, revealing unexpected and sometimes counter-intuitive aspects in several municipalities, some of which are characterised by innovative prospects and opportunities for redevelopment of their historic centers. Correlations between information units at the different levels of the dendrogram have also indicated interesting trends and attitudes, whose comparisons can address territorial policies on both a local and provincial scale. Furthermore, the focus on the “cities network” is here assumed and proposed as the privileged point of observation of territory and the related aspects of the quality of life.

Abstract Action toward strengthened disaster risk reduction (DRR) ideally builds from evidence-based policymaking to inform decisions and priorities. This is a guiding principle for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), which outlines priorities for action to reduce disaster risk. However, some of these practical guidelines conceal oversimplified or unsubstantiated claims and assumptions, what we refer to as “truisms”, which, if not properly addressed, may jeopardize the long-term goal to reduce disaster risks. Thus far, much DRR research has focused on ways to bridge the gap between science and practice while devoting less attention to the premises that shape the understanding of DRR issues. In this article, written in the spirit of a perspective piece on the state of the DRR field, we utilize the SFDRR as an illustrative case to identify and interrogate ten selected truisms, from across the social and natural sciences, that have been prevalent in shaping DRR research and practice. The ten truisms concern forecasting, loss, conflict, migration, the local level, collaboration, social capital, prevention, policy change, and risk awareness. We discuss central claims associated with each truism, relate those claims to insights in recent DRR scholarship, and end with suggestions for developing the field through advances in conceptualization, measurement, and causal inference.

Abstract Natural hazard events provide opportunities for policy change to enhance disaster risk reduction (DRR), yet it remains unclear whether these events actually fulfill this transformative role around the world. Here, we investigate relationships between the frequency (number of events) and severity (fatalities, economic losses, and affected people) of natural hazards and DRR policy change in 85 countries over eight years. Our results show that frequency and severity factors are generally unassociated with improved DRR policy when controlling for income-levels, differences in starting policy values, and hazard event types. This is a robust result that accounts for event frequency and different hazard severity indicators, four baseline periods estimating hazard impacts, and multiple policy indicators. Although we show that natural hazards are unassociated with improved DRR policy globally, the study unveils variability in policy progress between countries experiencing similar levels of hazard frequency and severity.

<p>In snow-prone regions, snowmelt is one of the main drivers of runoff. For operational flood forecasting and mitigation, the spatial distribution of snow water equivalent (SWE) in near real time is necessary. In this context, in situ observations of SWE provide a valuable information. Nonetheless, the high spatial variability of snowpack characteristics makes it necessary to implement some kind of snow modelling to get a spatially continuous estimation. Data assimilation is thus a useful approach to combine information from both observation and modeling in near real-time. </p><p>For example, at the provincial government of Quebec (eastern Canada), the HYDROTEL Snowpack Model is applied on a daily basis over a 0.1 degree resolution mesh covering the whole province. The modelled SWE is corrected in real time by in situ manual snow survey which are assimilated using a spatial particles filter (Cantet et al., 2019). This assimilation method improves the reliability of SWE estimation at ungauged sites.</p><p>The availability of manual snow surveys is however limited both in space and time. These measurements are conducted on a bi-weekly basis in a limited number of sites. In order to further improve the temporal and spatial observation coverage, alternative sources of data should be considered.</p><p>In this research, it is hypothesized that data gathered by SR50 sonic sensors can be assimilated in the spatial particle filter to improve the SWE estimation. These automatic sensors provide hourly measurements of snow depth and have been deployed in Quebec since 2005. Beforehand, probabilistic SWE estimations were derived from the SR50 snow depth measurements using an ensemble of artificial neural networks (Odry et al. 2019). Considering the nature of the data and the conversion process, the uncertainty associated with this dataset is supposed larger than for the manual snow surveys. The objective of the research is to evaluate the potential interest of adding this lower-quality information in the assimilation framework.</p><p>The addition of frequent but uncertain data in the spatial particle filter required some adjustments in term of assimilation frequency and particle resampling. A reordering of the particles was implemented to maintain the spatial coherence between the different particles. With these changes, the consideration of both manual snow surveys and SR50 data in the spatial particle filter reached performances that are comparable to the initial particle filter that combines only the model and manual snow survey for estimating SWE in ungauged sites. However, the addition of SR50 data in the particle filter allows for continuous information in time, between manual snow surveys.</p><p> </p><p><strong>References:</strong></p><p>Cantet, P., Boucher, M.-A., Lachance-Coutier, S., Turcotte, R., Fortin, V. (2019). Using a particle filter to estimate the spatial distribution of the snowpack water equivalent. J. Hydrometeorol, 20.</p><p>Odry, J., Boucher, M.-A., Cantet,P., Lachance-Cloutier, S., Turcotte, R., St-Louis, P.-Y. (2019). Using artificial neural networks to estimate snow water equivalent from snow depth. Canadian water ressources journal (under review)</p>

RÉSUMÉ: Les courbes Intensité-Durée-Fréquence (IDF) sont l’outil mathématique principalement utilisé par les ingénieur(-e)s pour la modélisation des précipitations extrêmes à un endroit donné. Pour obtenir des courbes IDF fiables, des méthodes statistiques robustes sont nécessaires. L’utilisation de modèles d’échelle est indiquée pour estimer de façon plus précise les courbes IDF en réduisant le nombre de paramètres nécessaires pour modéliser le comportement ex-trême du processus de pluie. Un modèle d’échelle suppose l’existence d’une relation entre les distributions des maxima annuels d’intensité pour les différentes durées d’accumulation. Il existe différentes relations d’échelle possibles, donnant naissance à une variété de modèles. Dans ce mémoire, une procédure de test statistique est développée pour décider si un modèle d’échelle fixé est pertinent pour construire les courbes IDF à un endroit donné, basé sur les observations des maxima annuels historiques d’intensité de précipitations à cet endroit. Le test développé est une extension du test d’adéquation d’Anderson-Darling. Il implique de séparer la base de données en ensembles d’entraînement et de validation. L’ensemble d’entraînement est utilisé pour estimer les paramètres du modèle d’intérêt, et l’ensemble de validation est utilisé dans le calcul de la statistique. La distribution asymptotique de la statistique de test sous l’hypothèse nulle est établie dans un cadre général. Les quantiles de cette distribution théorique peuvent être approximés, ce qui permet de calculer analytiquement la région de rejet ainsi que la valeur-p pour le test. Dans le cas des courbes IDF, l’hypothèse nulle statue qu’un modèle d’échelle d’intérêt est adéquat. Les données sont des maxima d’intensité de précipitations. Les données correspondant à une durée d’accumulation fixée par l’utilisateur(trice) sont sélectionnées pour constituer l’ensemble de validation. Lorsque la durée choisie est la plus petite durée, les performances du test sont validées par une étude de simulation. Sous l’hypothèse nulle, le test rejette au taux nominal même pour des petits échantillons. Sous une hypothèse alternative (c’est-à-dire lorsque le modèle d’échelle utilisé pour générer les données s’écarte du modèle d’intérêt), le taux de rejet augmente avec la distance entre les modèles ainsi qu’avec la taille d’échantillon. Sur des données réelles, le test conduit à utiliser des modèles d’échelle différents à l’aéroport international Pierre-Elliott Trudeau de Montréal et à l’aérodrome Harbour de Vancouver. ABSTRACT: IDF curves are the primary mathematical tool used by engineers for modeling extreme precipitation at a given location. Reliable IDF curves require robust statistical methods. The use of scaling models allows for more precise estimations of IDF curves by reducing the num-ber of parameters needed to model the extreme behavior of the rainfall process. A scaling model assumes the existence of a relationship between the distributions of the annual inten-sity maxima accross the various accumulation durations. Diverse scaling relationships exist, giving rise to a variety of models. In this master thesis, a statistical testing procedure is developed to determine if a scaling model is suitable for constructing IDF curves at a given location, based on historical annual rain intensity maxima observed at that location. The developed test is an extension of the Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit test. It involves splitting the database into training and validation sets. The training set is used to estimate the parameters of the model of interest, and the validation set is used in the calculation of the test statistic. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothe-sis is established in a general framework. Quantiles of this theoretical distribution can be approximated, allowing for the analytical calculation of the rejection region as well as the p-value for the test. In the case of IDF curves, the null hypothesis states that a target scaling model is adequate. The data consist of precipitation intensity maxima. Data corresponding to a duration fixed by the user are selected to constitute the validation set. When the chosen duration is the smallest duration, the performances of the test are validated through a simulation study. Under the null hypothesis, the test maintains the nominal rejection rate even for small samples. Under an alternative hypothesis (i.e., when the scaling model used to generate the data deviates from the target model), the rejection rate increases with the discrepancy between the models as well as with the sample size. When applied to historical data, the test suggests the use of different scaling models at the Montréal Pierre-Elliott Trudeau international airport and at the Vancouver Harbour aerodrome.

Abstract Climate change is affecting freshwater systems, leading to increased water temperatures, which is posing a threat to freshwater ecological communities. In the Nechako River, a water management program has been in place since the 1980s to maintain water temperatures at 20°C during the migration of Sockeye salmon. However, the program's effectiveness in mitigating the impacts of climate change on resident species like Chinook salmon's thermal exposure is uncertain. In this study, we utilised the CEQUEAU hydrological model and life stage-specific physiological data to evaluate the consequences of the current program on Chinook salmon's thermal exposure under two contrasting climate change and socio-economic scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5). The results indicate that the thermal exposure risk is projected to be above the optimal threshold for parr and adult life stages under both scenarios relative to the 1980s. These life stages could face an increase in thermal exposure ranging from up to 2 and 5 times by 2090s relative to the 1980s during the months they occurred under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, including when the program is active (July 20th to August 20th). Additionally, our study shows that climate change will result in a substantial rise in cumulative heat degree days, ranging from 1.9 to 5.8 times (2050s) and 2.9 to 12.9 times (2090s) in comparison to the 1980s under SSP5-8.5. Our study highlights the need for a holistic approach to review the current Nechako management plan and consider all species in the Nechako River system in the face of climate change.

The interaction of water flow, ice, and structures is common in fluvial ice processes, particularly around Ice Control Structures (ICSs) that are used to manage and prevent ice jam floods. To evaluate the effectiveness of ICSs, it is essential to understand the complex interaction between water flow, ice and the structure. Numerical modeling is a valuable tool that can facilitate such understanding. Until now, classical Eulerian mesh-based methods have not been evaluated for the simulation of ice interaction with ICS. In this paper we evaluate the capability, accuracy, and efficiency of a coupled Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) and multi-body motion numerical model, based on the mesh-based FLOW-3D V.2023 R1 software for simulation of ice-structure interactions in several benchmark cases. The model’s performance was compared with results from meshless-based models (performed by others) for the same laboratory test cases that were used as a reference for the comparison. To this end, simulation results from a range of dam break laboratory experiments were analyzed, encompassing varying numbers of floating objects with distinct characteristics, both in the presence and absence of ICS, and under different downstream water levels. The results show that the overall accuracy of the FLOW-3D model under various experimental conditions resulted in a RMSE of 0.0534 as opposed to an overall RMSE of 0.0599 for the meshless methods. Instabilities were observed in the FLOW-3D model for more complex phenomena that involve open boundaries and a larger number of blocks. Although the FLOW-3D model exhibited a similar computational time to the GPU-accelerated meshless-based models, constraints on the processors speed and the number of cores available for use by the processors could limit the computational time.

Abstract. Efficient adaptation strategies to climate change require the estimation of future impacts and the uncertainty surrounding this estimation. Over- or underestimating future uncertainty may lead to maladaptation. Hydrological impact studies typically use a top-down approach in which multiple climate models are used to assess the uncertainty related to the climate model structure and climate sensitivity. Despite ongoing debate, impact modelers have typically embraced the concept of “model democracy”, in which each climate model is considered equally fit. The newer Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations, with several models showing a climate sensitivity larger than that of Phase 5 (CMIP5) and larger than the likely range based on past climate information and understanding of planetary physics, have reignited the model democracy debate. Some have suggested that “hot” models be removed from impact studies to avoid skewing impact results toward unlikely futures. Indeed, the inclusion of these models in impact studies carries a significant risk of overestimating the impact of climate change. This large-sample study looks at the impact of removing hot models on the projections of future streamflow over 3107 North American catchments. More precisely, the variability in future projections of mean, high, and low flows is evaluated using an ensemble of 19 CMIP6 general circulation models (GCMs), 5 of which are deemed hot based on their global equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The results show that the reduced ensemble of 14 climate models provides streamflow projections with reduced future variability for Canada, Alaska, the Southeast US, and along the Pacific coast. Elsewhere, the reduced ensemble has either no impact or results in increased variability in future streamflow, indicating that global outlier climate models do not necessarily provide regional outlier projections of future impacts. These results emphasize the delicate nature of climate model selection, especially based on global fitness metrics that may not be appropriate for local and regional assessments.