Votre recherche

In response to extreme flood events and an increasing awareness that traditional flood control measures alone are inadequate to deal with growing flood risks, spatial flood risk management strategies have been introduced. These strategies do not only aim to reduce the probability and consequences of floods, they also aim to improve local and regional spatial qualities. To date, however, research has been largely ignorant as to how spatial quality, as part of spatial flood risk management strategies, can be successfully achieved in practice. Therefore, this research aims to illuminate how spatial quality is achieved in planning practice. This is done by evaluating the configurations of policy instruments that have been applied in the Dutch Room for the River policy program to successfully achieve spatial quality. This policy program is well known for its dual objective of accommodating higher flood levels as well as improving the spatial quality of the riverine areas. Based on a qualitative comparative analysis, we identified three successful configurations of policy instruments. These constitute three distinct management strategies: the “program‐as‐guardian”, the “project‐as‐driver,” and “going all‐in” strategies. These strategies provide important leads in furthering the development and implementation of spatial flood risk management, both in the Netherlands and abroad.

L’adaptation au changement climatique est un nouvel enjeu pour la gestion des territoires. Au niveau local, elle apparaît souvent comme une injonction, alors même que, pour l’instant, elle est un concept flou. Elle est présentée comme l’application de bonnes pratiques, mais les questions « qui s’adapte à quoi ? » et « pourquoi ? » demeurent implicites. En explicitant ces éléments, nous proposons de montrer que l’adaptation est une question plurielle et politique. À partir de l’analyse des documents de planification et des plans d’action faisant référence aux changements globaux sur un territoire littoral, nous montrons l’existence de quatre logiques d’adaptation distinctes, plus ou moins transformatrices du système socioécologique, que l’on peut appréhender à partir de la typologie suivante : « contrôler et maintenir », « faire faire », « réguler » et « reconfigurer », qui portent en germe différentes reconfigurations socioéconomiques et politiques. , Since the 2000s, “adaptation” is a new dictate for the management of local territories in France, but its implementation is fairly limited. Adaptation is mainly a semantically unclear and loosely defined concept. Decision-makers could “operationalize” adaptation by simply applying a specific methodology. However, adaptation is not a mere mechanism; it is also a process that implies economic, social and ecological trade-offs for the socio-ecological system. These political dimensions are often unformulated. In order to provide a vehicle to clarify this concept and its political dimensions, we propose a typology of adaptation measures. What does adaptation mean? Adjustment of what (territories, populations, communities, local economies, etc.), to what (climate change, global change) and with what effects? We reviewed local actions and strategic plans related to climate but also to urban planning, flooding and water management on the eastern coastal area of Languedoc Roussillon in Mediterranean France. We conducted and analyzed semi-structured interviews with institutional actors. We analyzed and classified public policy instruments, associated the underlying “logic” (raise limiting factors, create a new awareness, etc.), and their potential effects. Throughout our effort to develop a typology, we have highlighted the political dimensions of adaptation actions and shed a light on trade-offs linked to adaptation choices.

River restoration practice frequently employs conservative designs that create and maintain prescribed, static morphology. Such approaches ignore an emerging understanding of resilient river systems that typically adjust their morphology in response to hydrologic, vegetative and sediment supply changes. As such, using increased dynamism as a restoration design objective will arguably yield more diverse and productive habitats, better managed expectations, and more self-sustaining outcomes. Here, we answer the following question: does restoring lateral migration in a channelised river that was once a wandering gravel-bed river, result in more diverse in-channel geomorphology? We acquired pre- and post-restoration topographic surveys on a segment of the Allt Lorgy, Scotland to quantify morphodynamics and systematically map geomorphic units, using Geomorphic Unit Tool (GUT) software. GUT implements topographic definitions to discriminate between a taxonomy of fluvial landforms that have been developed from an extension of the River Styles framework, using 3-tiered hierarchy: (1) differentiation based on stage or elevation relative to channel; (2) classification of form based on shape (mound, bowl, trough, saddle, plane, wall); and (3) mapping geomorphic units based on attributes (e.g., position and orientation). Results showed restoration increased geomorphic unit diversity, with the Shannon Diversity Index increasing from 1.40 pre-restoration (2012) to 2.04 (2014) and 2.05 (2016) after restoration. Channel widening, due to bank erosion, caused aerial coverage of in-channel geomorphic units to increase 23% after restoration and 6% further in the two-years following restoration. Once bank protection was removed, allowing bank erosion yieled a local supply of sediment to enable the formation and maintenance of lateral and point bars, riffles and diagonal bar complexes, and instream wood created structurally-forced pools and riffles. The methodology used systematically quantifies how geomorphic unit diversity increases when a river is given back its freedom space. The framework allows for testing restoration design hypotheses in post-project appraisal.

Watershed management efforts in agriculturally dominated landscapes of North America face nearly two centuries of laws and policies that encouraged habitat destruction. Although streams and wetlands in these landscapes are actively being restored using designs that incorporate science and engineering, watershed drainage laws can constrain action or impact passively restored or naturalized habitat. In general, drainage laws require removal of any riparian vegetation or wood deemed to obstruct flow in streams regulated as drains. We use a case study from Indiana (USA) to introduce the shortcomings of drainage laws for allowing large wood, which is an important habitat feature, to remain in stream ecosystems. Removals of large wood from monitored stream reaches in a regulated drain were associated with subsequent declines in fish biomass. Such legal activities represent an important environmental management problem that exists under drainage laws which apply to streams over a widespread geographic region of North America. Recent litigation in Wisconsin (USA) suggests that if state legislatures fail to update these antiquated laws, the courts may act in favour of science-based management of drains. The statutes and regulations that govern agricultural drainage warrant careful consideration if streams within drainage districts are to be managed to improve ecological function. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Placement of large wood is a common stream restoration technique in western North America and increasingly in other parts of the world. Considerable information exists on response of anadromous salmonids in small (< 15 m bankfull width) coastal streams of western North America, but limited information exists on anadromous fish response to wood placement in larger streams or in the more arid interior Columbia River Basin. An extensive post-treatment design was used to sample 29 large wood placement projects to determine their physical and biological effectiveness. We sampled paired treatment and control reaches that were approximately 20 times longer than bankfull width and quantified fish abundance and habitat attributes during summer. Proportion of pool area, number of pools, large wood (LW), and pool forming large wood were significantly higher in paired treatment than control reaches. Juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), steelhead (O. mykiss) coho salmon (O. kisutch), and cutthroat trout (O. clarkii) abundances were significantly higher in treatment than control reaches, but no significant responses were detected for mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) or dace (Rhinichthys spp.). Chinook and coho responses were positively correlated with LW and pool area suggesting wood placement produced reach-scale increases of juvenile salmonid abundance.

Stream restoration approaches most often quantify habitat degradation, and therefore recovery objectives, on aquatic habitat metrics based on a narrow range of species needs (e.g., salmon and trout), as well as channel evolution models and channel design tools biased toward single-threaded, and “sediment-balanced” channel patterns. Although this strategy enhances perceived habitat needs, it often fails to properly identify the underlying geomorphological and ecological processes limiting species recovery and ecosystem restoration. In this paper, a unique process-based approach to restoration that strives to restore degraded stream, river, or meadow systems to the premanipulated condition is presented. The proposed relatively simple Geomorphic Grade Line (GGL) design method is based on Geographic Information System (GIS) and field-based analyses and the development of design maps using relative elevation models that expose the relic predisturbance valley surface. Several case studies are presented to both describe the development of the GGL method and to illustrate how the GGL method of evaluating valley surfaces has been applied to Stage 0 restoration design. The paper also summarizes the wide applicability of the GGL method, the advantages and limitations of the method, and key considerations for future designers of Stage 0 systems anywhere in the world. By presenting this ongoing Stage 0 restoration work, the authors hope to inspire other practitioners to embrace the restoration of dynamism and diversity through restoring the processes that create multifaceted river systems that provide long-term resiliency, meta-stability, larger and more complex and diverse habitats, and optimal ecosystem benefits.

We apply structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry with imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to measure bank erosion processes along a mid-sized river reach. This technique offers a unique set of characteristics compared to previously used methods to monitor banks, such as high resolution and relatively fast deployment in the field. We analyse the retreat of a 1.2&thinsp;km restored bank of the Meuse River which has complex vertical scarps laying on a straight reach, features that present specific challenges to the UAV-SfM application. We surveyed eight times within a year with a simple approach, combining different photograph perspectives and overlaps to identify an effective UAV flight. The accuracy of the digital surface models (DSMs) was evaluated with real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS points and airborne laser scanning of the whole reach. An oblique perspective with eight photo overlaps and 20&thinsp;m of cross-sectional ground-control point distribution was sufficient to achieve the relative precision to observation distance of ∼1&thinsp;:&thinsp;1400 and 3&thinsp;cm root mean square error (RMSE), complying with the required accuracy. A complementary nadiral view increased coverage behind bank toe vegetation. Sequential DSMs captured signatures of the erosion cycle such as mass failures, slump-block deposition, and bank undermining. Although UAV-SfM requires low water levels and banks without dense vegetation as many other techniques, it is a fast-in-the-field alternative to survey reach-scale riverbanks in sufficient resolution and accuracy to quantify bank retreat and identify morphological features of the bank failure and erosion processes. Improvements to the adopted approach are recommended to achieve higher accuracies.

The avulsion time scale of channels on the Yellow River delta (YRD) is about a decade due to the large sediment load, and rapid channel aggradation and progradation. Nevertheless, the Qingshuigou channel has been maintained for about four decades since 1976. This channel provides an ideal opportunity to study channel evolution following avulsion and to examine different avulsion criteria. In this study, we analyzed the geomorphic adjustment of the lower Qingshuigou channel during 1976–2015, and calculated normalized gradient advantage and superelevation at the channel to estimate how close the channel was to avulsion. Results showed that channel evolution processes may be divided into four phases: I (1976–1980) rapid aggradation, II (1980–1985) channel widening and enlargement, III (1985–1996) main channel aggradation and shrinkage, and IV (1996–2015) main channel incision and deepening. Evolution phases I, II and III are similar to the avulsion cycle observed in natural and experimental fluvial systems. The calculated values of normalized gradient advantage and superelevation in early 1990s exceeded the critical values suggested by previous studies, implying that the channel was prone to avulsion. Nevertheless, avulsion was prevented mainly due to limited overbank flows, constriction from artificial dikes, and slowed channel extension as a result of reduced sediment load. The evolution of the Qingshuigou channel confirms previous arguments that superelevation and gradient advantage are not sufficient for avulsion, and multiple factors should be considered, including flood frequency, lateral mobility, sediment diameter, and human interruptions.

Abstract Youth exposed to traumatic events are at higher risk for negative developmental outcomes, including low academic performance, poor social skills, and mental health concerns. To best address these risks, school‐based intervention services, and trauma‐informed practices can be provided. The goal of this study was to systematically review the intervention research conducted on school‐based trauma interventions, with specific attention to examine intervention effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability across studies. It was found that feasibility and acceptability are not frequently examined, though the data available showed that Enhancing Resiliency Amongst Students Experiencing‐Stress (ERASE‐Stress) and school‐based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) had high rates of fidelity; and school‐based CBT had high levels of acceptability. The review also examined demographic variables and found that U. S.‐based research reported racially/ethnically diverse samples, and most samples were from low‐income populations. Most studies examined youth exposed to war‐ and terror‐related traumas or natural disaster‐related traumas. Additionally, this review provides future directions for research and reveals the need for further research on intervention feasibility and acceptability. A brief description of practice recommendations based on prior research has also been included. It also exposes the need for studies that examine various student demographic variables that are currently not examined and consistency in rating scale use in school‐based trauma intervention research.

Prewhitening has been used to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann‐Kendall (MK) test in trend‐detection studies of hydrological time series. However, its ability to accomplish such a task has not been well documented. This study investigates this issue by Monte Carlo simulation. Simulated time series consist of a linear trend and a lag 1 autoregressive (AR(1)) process with a noise. Simulation results demonstrate that when trend exists in a time series, the effect of positive/negative serial correlation on the MK test is dependent upon sample size, magnitude of serial correlation, and magnitude of trend. When sample size and magnitude of trend are large enough, serial correlation no longer significantly affects the MK test statistics. Removal of positive AR(1) from time series by prewhitening will remove a portion of trend and hence reduces the possibility of rejecting the null hypothesis while it might be false. Contrarily, removal of negative AR(1) by prewhitening will inflate trend and leads to an increase in the possibility of rejecting the null hypothesis while it might be true. Therefore, prewhitening is not suitable for eliminating the effect of serial correlation on the MK test when trend exists within a time series.

Framed within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) of the European Commission, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is producing an enhanced global dataset for the land component of the fifth generation of European ReAnalysis (ERA5), hereafter referred to as ERA5-Land. Once completed, the period covered will span from 1950 to the present, with continuous updates to support land monitoring applications. ERA5-Land describes the evolution of the water and energy cycles over land in a consistent manner over the production period, which, among others, could be used to analyse trends and anomalies. This is achieved through global high-resolution numerical integrations of the ECMWF land surface model driven by the downscaled meteorological forcing from the ERA5 climate reanalysis, including an elevation correction for the thermodynamic near-surface state. ERA5-Land shares with ERA5 most of the parameterizations that guarantees the use of the state-of-the-art land surface modelling applied to numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. A main advantage of ERA5-Land compared to ERA5 and the older ERA-Interim is the horizontal resolution, which is enhanced globally to 9 km compared to 31 km (ERA5) or 80 km (ERA-Interim), whereas the temporal resolution is hourly as in ERA5. Evaluation against independent in situ observations and global model or satellite-based reference datasets shows the added value of ERA5-Land in the description of the hydrological cycle, in particular with enhanced soil moisture and lake description, and an overall better agreement of river discharge estimations with available observations. However, ERA5-Land snow depth fields present a mixed performance when compared to those of ERA5, depending on geographical location and altitude. The description of the energy cycle shows comparable results with ERA5. Nevertheless, ERA5-Land reduces the global averaged root mean square error of the skin temperature, taking as reference MODIS data, mainly due to the contribution of coastal points where spatial resolution is important. Since January 2020, the ERA5-Land period available has extended from January 1981 to the near present, with a 2- to 3-month delay with respect to real time. The segment prior to 1981 is in production, aiming for a release of the whole dataset in summer/autumn 2021. The high spatial and temporal resolution of ERA5-Land, its extended period, and the consistency of the fields produced makes it a valuable dataset to support hydrological studies, to initialize NWP and climate models, and to support diverse applications dealing with water resource, land, and environmental management. The full ERA5-Land hourly (Muñoz-Sabater, 2019a) and monthly (Muñoz-Sabater, 2019b) averaged datasets presented in this paper are available through the C3S Climate Data Store at https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac and https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30, respectively.

Abstract Within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), ECMWF is producing the ERA5 reanalysis which, once completed, will embody a detailed record of the global atmosphere, land surface and ocean waves from 1950 onwards. This new reanalysis replaces the ERA‐Interim reanalysis (spanning 1979 onwards) which was started in 2006. ERA5 is based on the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) Cy41r2 which was operational in 2016. ERA5 thus benefits from a decade of developments in model physics, core dynamics and data assimilation. In addition to a significantly enhanced horizontal resolution of 31 km, compared to 80 km for ERA‐Interim, ERA5 has hourly output throughout, and an uncertainty estimate from an ensemble (3‐hourly at half the horizontal resolution). This paper describes the general set‐up of ERA5, as well as a basic evaluation of characteristics and performance, with a focus on the dataset from 1979 onwards which is currently publicly available. Re‐forecasts from ERA5 analyses show a gain of up to one day in skill with respect to ERA‐Interim. Comparison with radiosonde and PILOT data prior to assimilation shows an improved fit for temperature, wind and humidity in the troposphere, but not the stratosphere. A comparison with independent buoy data shows a much improved fit for ocean wave height. The uncertainty estimate reflects the evolution of the observing systems used in ERA5. The enhanced temporal and spatial resolution allows for a detailed evolution of weather systems. For precipitation, global‐mean correlation with monthly‐mean GPCP data is increased from 67% to 77%. In general, low‐frequency variability is found to be well represented and from 10 hPa downwards general patterns of anomalies in temperature match those from the ERA‐Interim, MERRA‐2 and JRA‐55 reanalyses.

Land surface hydrology controls runoff production and the associated transport of sediments, and a wide variety of anthropogenic organic chemicals, and nutrients from upland landscape areas and hillslopes to streams and other water bodies. Based on interactions between landscape characteristics and precipitation inputs, watersheds respond differently to different climatic inputs (e.g. precipitation and solar radiation). This study compares the hydrologic responses of the MidAtlantic watersheds, and identifies the landscape and climatic descriptors that control those responses. Our approach was to select representative watersheds from the Mid-Atlantic region, group the watersheds by physiographic province and ecoregion, and then collect landscape, climate, and hydrologic response descriptor data for each selected watershed. For example, we extracted extensive landscape descriptor data from soil, land use and land cover, and digital elevation model geographic information system (GIS) databases. After sufficient data was collected, we conducted a variety of studies to determine how different landscape and climatic descriptors influence the hydrologic response of Mid-Atlantic watersheds. This report is comprised of four main parts. Part I describes the selection of the representative study watersheds and the determination of representative physical landscape descriptors for each watershed using geographic information system analysis tools. Part II characterizes the climate and associated hydrologic responses of the study watersheds. To select climate descriptors that are good predictors of hydrologic response, we examined a large number of candidate descriptors. Based on our examination, we selected dryness index and mean monthly rainfall as the best hydrologic response predictors. In Part II, we also present the results of our study hydrologic response comparisons of the study watersheds using a water balance approach. The water balance approach was based on comparisons of precipitation, streamflow, and evapotranspiration at annual, monthly, and daily time scales. These comparisons revealed that elevation and latitudinal position strongly influence hydrologic response. The results also showed that mountainous watersheds of the Appalachian Plateau, Ridge and Valley, and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces have more streamflow and less evapotranspiration than watersheds located in the Piedmont Province, and that snowmelt contributes a large portion of streamflow. Part III presents relationships we derived between landscape-climatic descriptors and the hydrologic response descriptors. Flow duration indices (Q1...Q95) were used to represent the hydrologic responses of the study watersheds. In Part III, we also present comparisons of the hydrologic responses of the study watersheds at high flow condition, represented by the Q1 index, medium flow condition represented by the Q50 index, and low flow condition represented by the Q95 index. These comparisons revealed that: the Appalachian Plateau, ridge-dominated Ridge and Valley, and Blue Ridge watersheds have the highest Q1 and Q50 indices; the valley-dominated Ridge and Valley watersheds have the lowest Q50 index, and the Piedmont watersheds have the lowest Q1 index and a relatively high Q95 index. Finally, Part IV discusses some of the implications of the study results for watershed management. We also present applications of the research for hydrologic modeling and watershed assessment.