Votre recherche

Abstract. This study investigates the ability of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks to perform streamflow prediction at ungauged basins. A set of state-of-the-art, hydrological model-dependent regionalization methods are applied to 148 catchments in northeast North America and compared to an LSTM model that uses the exact same available data as the hydrological models. While conceptual model-based methods attempt to derive parameterizations at ungauged sites from other similar or nearby catchments, the LSTM model uses all available data in the region to maximize the information content and increase its robustness. Furthermore, by design, the LSTM does not require explicit definition of hydrological processes and derives its own structure from the provided data. The LSTM networks were able to clearly outperform the hydrological models in a leave-one-out cross-validation regionalization setting on most catchments in the study area, with the LSTM model outperforming the hydrological models in 93 % to 97 % of catchments depending on the hydrological model. Furthermore, for up to 78 % of the catchments, the LSTM model was able to predict streamflow more accurately on pseudo-ungauged catchments than hydrological models calibrated on the target data, showing that the LSTM model's structure was better suited to convert the meteorological data and geophysical descriptors into streamflow than the hydrological models even calibrated to those sites in these cases. Furthermore, the LSTM model robustness was tested by varying its hyperparameters, and still outperformed hydrological models in regionalization in almost all cases. Overall, LSTM networks have the potential to change the regionalization research landscape by providing clear improvement pathways over traditional methods in the field of streamflow prediction in ungauged catchments.

Natural disasters have been demonstrated to cause devastating effects on economic and social development in China, but little is known about the relationship between natural disasters and income at the household level. This study explores the impact of natural disasters on household income, expenditure, and inequality in China as the first study of this nature for the country. The empirical analysis is conducted based on a unique panel dataset that contains six waves of the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) survey data over the 1988–2018 period, data on natural disasters, and other social and economic status of households. By employing the fixed effects models, we find that disasters increase contemporaneous levels of income inequality, and disasters that occurred in the previous year significantly increase expenditure inequality. Natural disasters increase operating income inequality but decrease transfer income inequality. Poor households are found to be more vulnerable to disasters and suffer significant income losses. However, there is no evidence to suggest that natural disasters significantly reduce the income of upper- and middle-income groups. These findings have important implications for policies aimed at poverty alleviation and revenue recycling, as they can help improve economic justice and enhance resilience to natural disasters.

Mise en patrimoine des crues et des inondations Sous la direction de Alexis Metzger et Jamie Linton Collection : Géographie et cultures

Agricultural activities can result in the contamination of surface runoff with pathogens, pesticides, and nutrients. These pollutants can enter surface water bodies in two ways: by direct discharge into surface waters or by infiltration and recharge into groundwater, followed by release to surface waters. Lack of financial resources makes risk assessment through analysis of drinking water pollutants challenging for drinking water suppliers. Inability to identify agricultural lands with a high-risk level and implement action measures might lead to public health issues. As a result, it is essential to identify hazards and conduct risk assessments even with limited data. This study proposes a risk assessment model for agricultural activities based on available data and integrating various types of knowledge, including expert and literature knowledge, to estimate the levels of hazard and risk that different agricultural activities could pose to the quality of withdrawal waters. To accomplish this, we built a Bayesian network with continuous and discrete inputs capturing raw water quality and land use upstream of drinking water intakes (DWIs). This probabilistic model integrates the DWI vulnerability, threat exposure, and threats from agricultural activities, including animal and crop production inventoried in drainage basins. The probabilistic dependencies between model nodes are established through a novel adaptation of a mixed aggregation method. The mixed aggregation method, a traditional approach used in ecological assessments following a deterministic framework, involves using fixed assumptions and parameters to estimate ecological outcomes in a specific case without considering inherent randomness and uncertainty within the system. After validation, this probabilistic model was used for four water intakes in a heavily urbanized watershed with agricultural activities in the south of Quebec, Canada. The findings imply that this methodology can assist stakeholders direct their efforts and investments on at-risk locations by identifying agricultural areas that can potentially pose a risk to DWIs.

Abstract This study compares the impacts of climate, agriculture and wetlands on the spatio-temporal variability of seasonal daily minimum flows during the period 1930–2019 in 17 watersheds of southern Quebec (Canada). In terms of spatial variability, correlation analysis revealed that seasonal daily minimum flows were mainly negatively correlated with the agricultural surface area in watersheds in spring, summer and fall. In winter, these flows were positively correlated with the wetland surface area and March temperatures but negatively correlated with snowfall. During all four seasons, spatial variability was characterized by higher daily minimum flow values on the north shore (smaller agricultural surface area and larger wetland surface area) than those on the south shore. As for temporal variability, the application of six tests of the long-term trend analysis showed that most agricultural watersheds are characterized by a significant increase in flows during the four seasons due to the reduction in agricultural area, thus favoring water infiltration, and increased rainfall in summer and fall. On the other hand, the reduction in the snowfall resulted in a reduction in summer daily minimum flows observed in several less agricultural watersheds.

Several statistical methods were used to analyze the spatio-temporal variability of daily minimum extreme flows (DMEF) in 17 watersheds—divided into three homogenous hydroclimatic regions of southern Quebec—during the transitional seasons (spring and fall), during the 1930–2019 period. Regarding spatial variability, there was a clear difference between the south and north shores of the St. Lawrence River, south of 47° N. DMEF were lower in the more agricultural watersheds on the south shore during transitional seasons compared to those on the north shore. A correlation analysis showed that this difference in flows was mainly due to more agricultural areas ((larger area (>20%) on the south than on the north shore (<5%)). An analysis of the long-term trend of these flows showed that the DMEF of south-shore rivers have increased significantly since the 1960s, during the fall (October to December), due to an increase in rainfall and a reduction in cultivated land, which increased the infiltration in the region. Although there was little difference between the two shores in the spring (April to June), we observed a decrease in minimum extreme flows in half (50%) of the south-shore rivers located north of 47° N.

Abstract This study explores the potential impacts of climate change on soil erosion in an agricultural catchment in eastern Canada. The Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) was used to calculate the sediment yields from the Acadie River Catchment for the historical 1996–2019 period. The runoff variables of the MUSLE were obtained from a physically based hydrological model previously built and validated for the catchment. Then, the hydrological model was perturbed using climate change projections and used to assess the climate sensitivity of the sediment yield. Two runoff types representing possible modes of soil erosion were considered. While type A represents a baseline case in which soil erosion occurs due to surface runoff only, type B is more realistic since it assumed that tile drains also contribute to sediment export, but with a varying efficiency throughout the year. The calibration and validation of the tile efficiency factors against measurements in 2009–2015 for type B suggest that tile drains export the sediments with an efficiency of 20% and 50% in freezing and non-freezing conditions, respectively. Results indicate that tile drains account for 39% of the total annual sediment yield in the present climate. The timing of highest soil erosion shifts from spring to winter in response to warming and wetting, which can be explained by increasing winter runoff caused by shifting snowmelt timing towards winter, a greater number of mid-winter melt events as well as increasing rainfall fractions. The large uncertainties in precipitation projections cascade down to the erosion uncertainties in the more realistic type B, with annual sediment yield increasing or decreasing according to the precipitation uncertainty in a given climate change scenario. This study demonstrates the benefit of conservation and no-till pratices, which could reduce the annual sediment yields by 20% and 60%, respectively, under any given climate change scenario.

Climate anomalies, such as floods and droughts, as well as gradual temperature changes have been shown to adversely affect economies and societies. Although studies find that climate change might increase global inequality by widening disparities across countries, its effects on within-country income distribution have been little investigated, as has the role of rainfall anomalies. Here, we show that extreme levels of precipitation exacerbate within-country income inequality. The strength and direction of the effect depends on the agricultural intensity of an economy. In high-agricultural-intensity countries, climate anomalies that negatively impact the agricultural sector lower incomes at the bottom end of the distribution and generate greater income inequality. Our results indicate that a 1.5-SD increase in precipitation from average values has a 35-times-stronger impact on the bottom income shares for countries with high employment in agriculture compared to countries with low employment in the agricultural sector. Projections with modeled future precipitation and temperature reveal highly heterogeneous patterns on a global scale, with income inequality worsening in high-agricultural-intensity economies, particularly in Africa. Our findings suggest that rainfall anomalies and the degree of dependence on agriculture are crucial factors in assessing the negative impacts of climate change on the bottom of the income distribution.

Anthropogenic climate change is currently driving environmental transformation on a scale and at a pace that exceeds historical records. This represents an undeniably serious challenge to existing social, political, and economic systems. Humans have successfully faced similar challenges in the past, however. The archaeological record and Earth archives offer rare opportunities to observe the complex interaction between environmental and human systems under different climate regimes and at different spatial and temporal scales. The archaeology of climate change offers opportunities to identify the factors that promoted human resilience in the past and apply the knowledge gained to the present, contributing a much-needed, long-term perspective to climate research. One of the strengths of the archaeological record is the cultural diversity it encompasses, which offers alternatives to the solutions proposed from within the Western agro-industrial complex, which might not be viable cross-culturally. While contemporary climate discourse focuses on the importance of biodiversity, we highlight the importance of cultural diversity as a source of resilience.