Votre recherche

Atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations have increased to 2.5 times their pre-industrial levels, with a marked acceleration in recent decades. CH4 is responsible for approximately 30% of the global temperature rise since the Industrial Revolution. This growing concentration contributes to environmental degradation, including ocean acidification, accelerated climate change, and a rise in natural disasters. The column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of methane (XCH4) is a crucial indicator for assessing atmospheric CH4 levels. In this study, the Sentinel-5P TROPOMI instrument was employed to monitor, map, and estimate CH4 concentrations on both regional and global scales. However, TROPOMI data exhibits limitations such as spatial gaps and relatively coarse resolution, particularly at regional scales or over small areas. To mitigate these limitations, a novel Convolutional Neural Network Autoencoder (CNN-AE) model was developed. Validation was performed using the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON), providing a benchmark for evaluating the accuracy of various interpolation and prediction models. The CNN-AE model demonstrated the highest accuracy in regional-scale analysis, achieving a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 28.48 ppb and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 30.07 ppb. This was followed by the Random Forest (RF) regressor (MAE: 29.07 ppb; RMSE: 36.89 ppb), GridData Nearest Neighbor Interpolator (NNI) (MAE: 30.06 ppb; RMSE: 32.14 ppb), and the Radial Basis Function (RBF) Interpolator (MAE: 80.23 ppb; RMSE: 90.54 ppb). On a global scale, the CNN-AE again outperformed other methods, yielding the lowest MAE and RMSE (19.78 and 24.7 ppb, respectively), followed by RF (21.46 and 27.23 ppb), GridData NNI (25.3 and 32.62 ppb), and RBF (43.08 and 54.93 ppb).

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognized as strategic alternatives and complements to grey infrastructure for addressing water-related challenges in the context of climate change, urbanization, and biodiversity decline. This article presents a critical, theory-informed review of the state of NbS implementation in European water management, drawing on a structured synthesis of empirical evidence from regional case studies and policy frameworks. The analysis found that while NbS are effective in reducing surface runoff, mitigating floods, and improving water quality under low- to moderate-intensity events, their performance remains uncertain under extreme climate scenarios. Key gaps identified include the lack of long-term monitoring data, limited assessment of NbS under future climate conditions, and weak integration into mainstream planning and financing systems. Existing evaluation frameworks are critiqued for treating NbS as static interventions, overlooking their ecological dynamics and temporal variability. In response, a dynamic, climate-resilient assessment model is proposed—grounded in systems thinking, backcasting, and participatory scenario planning—to evaluate NbS adaptively. Emerging innovations, such as hybrid green–grey infrastructure, adaptive governance models, and novel financing mechanisms, are highlighted as key enablers for scaling NbS. The article contributes to the scientific literature by bridging theoretical and empirical insights, offering region-specific findings and recommendations based on a comparative analysis across diverse European contexts. These findings provide conceptual and methodological tools to better design, evaluate, and scale NbS for transformative, equitable, and climate-resilient water governance.

AbstractThe frequency and severity of floods has increased in different regions of the world due to climate change. Although the impact of floods on human health has been extensively studied, the increase in the segments of the population that are likely to be impacted by floods in the future makes it necessary to examine how adaptation measures impact the mental health of individuals affected by these natural disasters. The goal of this scoping review is to document the existing studies on flood adaptation measures and their impact on the mental health of affected populations, in order to identify the best preventive strategies as well as limitations that deserve further exploration. This study employed the methodology of the PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews to systematically search the databases Medline and Web of Science to identify studies that examined the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of flood victims. The database queries resulted in a total of 857 records from both databases. Following two rounds of screening, 9 studies were included for full-text analysis. Most of the analyzed studies sought to identify the factors that drive resilience in flood victims, particularly in the context of social capital (6 studies), whereas the remaining studies analyzed the impact of external interventions on the mental health of flood victims, either from preventive or post-disaster measures (3 studies). There is a very limited number of studies that analyze the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of populations and individuals affected by floods, which complicates the generalizability of their findings. There is a need for public health policies and guidelines for the development of flood adaptation measures that adequately consider a social component that can be used to support the mental health of flood victims.

In Canada, floods are the most common largely distributed hazard to life, property, the economy, water systems, and the environment costing the Canadian economy billions of dollars. Arising from this is FloodNet: a transdisciplinary strategic research network funded by Canadas Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, as a vehicle for a concerted nation-wide effort to improve flood forecasting and to better assess risk and manage the environmental and socio-economic consequences of floods. Four themes were explored in this network which include 1) Flood regimes in Canada; 2) Uncertainty of floods; 3) Development of a flood forecasting and early warning system and 4) Physical, socio-economic and environmental effects of floods. Over the years a range of statistical, hydrologic, modeling, and economic and psychometric analyses were used across the themes. FloodNet has made significant progress in: assessing spatial and temporal variation of extreme events; updating intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves; improving streamflow forecasting using novel techniques; development and testing of a Canadian adaptive flood forecasting and early warning system (CAFFEWS); a better understanding of flood impacts and risk. Despite these advancements FloodNet ends at a time when the World is still grappling with severe floods (e.g., Europe, China, Africa) and we report on several lessons learned. Mitigating the impact of flood hazards in Canada remains a challenging task due to the countrys varied geography, environment, and jurisdictional political boundaries. Canadian technical guide for developing IDF relations for infrastructure design in the climate change context has been recently updated. However, national guidelines for flood frequency analyses are needed since across the country there is not a unified approach to flood forecasting as each jurisdiction uses individual models and procedures. From the perspective of risk and vulnerability, there remains great need to better understand the direct and indirect impacts of floods on society, the economy and the environment.

When analysing flood risk governance in France since the beginning of the 1980s, central government appears as a predominant actor. However, to understand contemporary French flood risk governance ( FRG ), it is also important to highlight how this domination has progressively been undermined since 1982. First, a decentralisation movement has been initiated whose main characteristics are an increasing involvement of local governments and a difficulty for national authorities to maintain their predominant role. The second main change is a diversification in flood risk strategies going together with a diversification in the definition of the flood risk issue. FRG is not a sole matter of protection through defence, preparation, and recovery strategies anymore. Both prevention and mitigation strategies have progressively gained in legitimacy. It is in the latter that local governments and stakeholders have increasingly got involved and have taken up responsibilities and initiatives. The paper focuses on the explanatory factors behind both stability and change, and especially on the ongoing tension, between path dependency factors (i.e. state power and role) and organisational capability of local actors.