Votre recherche

Study region: This study aims at the Kunhar River Basin, Pakistan, that has been facing repeated flood occurrences on a recurring basis. As the flood susceptibility of this area is high, its topographic complexity demands correct predictive modeling for strategic flood planning. Study focus: We developed a system of flood susceptibility mapping based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. Four kernel functions were applied, and the highest-performing was the Radial Basis Function (SVM-RBF). The model was validated and trained using historical flood inventories, morphometric parameters, and hydrologic variables, and feature dimensionality was reduced via PCA for increased efficiency. New hydrological insights: The SVM-RBF model recorded an AUC of 0.8341, 88.02% success, 84.97% predictability, 0.89 Kappa value, and F1-score of 0.86, all of which indicated high predictability. Error analysis yielded a PBIAS of +2.14%, indicating negligible overestimation bias but within limits acceptable in hydrological modeling. The results support the superiority of the SVM-RBF approach compared to conventional bivariate methods in modeling flood susceptibility over the complex terrain of mountains. The results can be applied in guiding evidence-based flood mitigation, land-use planning, and adaptive management in the Kunhar River Basin. © 2025 The Author(s)

Flood risk assessment is an effective tool for disaster prevention and mitigation. As land use is a key factor influencing flood disasters, studying the impact of different land use patterns on flood risk is crucial. This study evaluates flood risk in the Chang-Zhu-Tan (CZT) urban agglomeration by selecting 17 socioeconomic and natural environmental factors within a risk assessment framework encompassing hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. Additionally, the Patch-Generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) and multilayer perceptron (MLP)/Bayesian network (BN) models were coupled to predict flood risks under three future land use scenarios: natural development, urban construction, and ecological protection. This integrated modeling framework combines MLP’s high-precision nonlinear fitting with BN’s probabilistic inference, effectively mitigating prediction uncertainty in traditional single-model approaches while preserving predictive accuracy and enhancing causal interpretability. The results indicate that high-risk flood zones are predominantly concentrated along the Xiang River, while medium-high- and medium-risk areas are mainly distributed on the periphery of high-risk zones, exhibiting a gradient decline. Low-risk areas are scattered in mountainous regions far from socioeconomic activities. Simulating future land use using the PLUS model with a Kappa coefficient of 0.78 and an overall accuracy of 0.87. Under all future scenarios, cropland decreases while construction land increases. Forestland decreases in all scenarios except for ecological protection, where it expands. In future risk predictions, the MLP model achieved a high accuracy of 97.83%, while the BN model reached 87.14%. Both models consistently indicated that the flood risk was minimized under the ecological protection scenario and maximized under the urban construction scenario. Therefore, adopting ecological protection measures can effectively mitigate flood risks, offering valuable guidance for future disaster prevention and mitigation strategies. © 2025 by the authors.

This study presents a novel bivariate-output deep learning framework based on LeNet-5 for the simultaneous prediction of urban flood susceptibility and inundation depth in Seoul, South Korea. Unlike previous studies that relied on single-output models, the proposed approach jointly learns classification and regression targets through a shared feature extraction structure, enhancing consistency and generalization. Among six tested architectures, the Le5SD_CBAM model—integrating a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM)—achieved the best performance, with 83% accuracy, an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.91 for flood susceptibility classification, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.12 m and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.18 m for depth estimation. The model’s spatial predictions aligned well with hydrological principles and past flood records, accurately identifying low-lying flood-prone zones and capturing localized inundation patterns influenced by infrastructure and micro-topography. Importantly, it detected spatial mismatches between susceptibility and depth, demonstrating the benefit of joint modeling. Variable importance analysis highlighted elevation as the dominant predictor, while distances to roads, rivers, and drainage systems were also key contributors. In contrast, secondary terrain attributes had limited influence, indicating that urban infrastructure has significantly altered natural flood flow dynamics. Although the model lacks dynamic forcings such as rainfall and upstream inflows, it remains a valuable tool for flood risk mapping in data-scarce settings. The bivariate-output framework improves computational efficiency and internal coherence compared to separate single-task models, supporting its integration into urban flood management and planning systems. © 2025 by the authors.

Flooding is an escalating hazard in arid and rapidly urbanizing environments such as Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where the lack of historical flood records and sparse monitoring systems challenge effective risk prediction. To address this gap, this study aims to develop an accurate and interpretable flood susceptibility-mapping framework tailored to data-scarce urban settings. The research integrates a stacked ensemble model—comprising machine learning: XGBoost, CatBoost, and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB)—with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance prediction accuracy and model transparency. Random Forest was excluded from the final model stack due to inferior classification performance. A diverse set of geospatial inputs, including digital elevation model, slope, flow direction, Curve Number, topographic indices, and LULC (from ESRI Sentinel-2) were used as predictors. Furthermore, 92 and 198 flooded and non-flooded points were used for model validation. The model achieved strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.92, Accuracy = 0.82) on the validation set. In the absence of official flood records, model outputs were intersected with road network data to identify 395 road points in highly susceptible zones. Although these points do not represent a formal validation dataset—due to the general lack of detailed flood event records in the region, particularly in relation to infrastructure—they provide a valuable proxy for identifying flood-prone road segments. SHAP explainability analysis revealed that TRI, TPI, and distance to rivers were the most globally influential features, while Curve Number and LULC were key drivers of high-risk predictions. The model mapped 139 km2 (8.7 %) of the area as very high flood susceptibility and 325 km2 (20.3 %) as high susceptibility, outperforming individual learners. These results confirm that stacked ensemble learning, paired with explainable AI and creative validation strategies, can produce reliable flood susceptibility maps even in data-constrained contexts. This framework offers a transferable and scalable solution for flood risk assessment in similar arid and urbanizing environments. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

The increasing threats of global flood risk mandate rapid and accurate high-resolution flood modeling strategies over large scales. In the United States, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Water Prediction (OWP) has operationalised a Flood Inundation Mapping (FIM) framework utilising the Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND)-Synthetic Rating Curve (SRC) approach. It translates streamflow into stage and subsequently maps the inundation over the floodplain. It is a low-fidelity FIM framework, suitable for large-scale applications with much less computational effort. The SRCs are calculated for each river segment using Manning's equation; however, uncertainty in Manning's parameters and missing bathymetry impart bias in SRC calculation, and thus in FIM. An SRC adjustment factor (λsrc), introduced by OWP, calibrates SRCs against USGS rating curves, HEC-RAS 1D rating curves, and National Weather Service (NWS)-Categorical Flood Inundation Mapping (CatFIM) locations. Adjusted SRCs improve the FIM predictions but are limited to locations with the above data sources. In this paper, we develop machine learning models to predict the λsrc over the entire United States river network. Results show that the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model yielded the strongest predictability, with an R2 of 0.70. The impact of λsrc on FIM predictions is evaluated for Hurricane Matthew in North Carolina and synthetic flood events in 15 watersheds. For Hurricane Matthew flooding, the mean percentage improvements in Critical Success Index (CSI), Probability of Detection (POD), and F1 Score are 17.5%, 20% and 12.5%, while for synthetic events, the improvements are 2.59%, 4.93%, and 3.03%, respectively. © 2025 The Author(s)

Floods constitute the most significant natural hazard to societies worldwide. Population growth and unchecked development have led to floodplain encroachment. Modelling suggests that climate change will regionally intensify the threat posed by future floods, with more people in harm's way. From a global change perspective, past flood events and their spatial-temporal patterns are of particular interest because they can be linked to former climate patterns, which can be used to guide future climate predictions. Millennial and centennial time series contain evidence of very rare extreme events, which are often considered by society as ‘unprecedented’. By understanding their timing, magnitude and frequency in conjunction with prevailing climate regime, we can better forecast their future occurrence. This Virtual Special Issue (VSI) entitled Temporal and spatial patterns in Holocene floods under the influence of past global change, and their implications for forecasting “unpredecented” future events comprises 14 papers that focus on how centennial and millennia-scale natural and documentary flood archives help improve future flood science. Specifically, documentation of large and very rare flood episodes challenges society's lack of imagination regarding the scale of flood disasters that are possible (what we term here, the “unknown unknowns”). Temporal and spatial flood behaviour and related climate patterns as well as the reconstruction of flood propagation in river systems are important foci of this VSI. These reconstructions are crucial for the provision of robust and reliable data sets, knowledge and baseline information for future flood scenarios and forecasting. We argue that it remains difficult to establish analogies for understanding flood risk during the current period of global warming. Most studies in this VSI suggest that the most severe flooding occurred during relatively cool climate periods, such as the Little Ice Age. However, flood patterns have been significantly altered by land use and river management in many catchments and floodplains over the last two centuries, thereby obscuring the climate signal. When the largest floods in instrumental records are compared with paleoflood records reconstructed from natural and documentary archives, it becomes clear that precedent floods should have been considered in many cases of flood frequency analysis and flood risk modelling in hydraulic infrastructure. Finally, numerical geomorphological analysis and hydrological simulations show great potential for testing and improving our understanding of the processes and factors involved in the temporal and spatial behaviour of floods. © 2025 The Authors

Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme floods in the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB). This study leverages the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to evaluate its performance in predicting river discharge across the LMB and to identify the key variables contributing to flood prediction through SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) and Universal Multifractal (UM) analyses, in a scale-dependent and scale-independent manner, respectively. The performance of the LSTM model is satisfactory, with Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values exceeding 0.9 for all subbasins when using all input features. The model tends to underestimate the largest peak flows in the midstream subbasins that experienced extreme rainfall events. According to SHAP, soil-related variables are important contributors to discharge prediction, with their impacts partially manifested through interactions with precipitation and runoff. Furthermore, the dominant contributing variables influencing flood prediction vary over time: soil-related variables and vegetation-related variables played a more significant role in earlier years, whereas hydrometeorological variables became more dominant after 2017. The UM analysis investigates the scaling behaviours of contributing variables, showing that hydrometeorological-related variables have a greater influence on predicting extreme discharge across the small temporal scales. Additionally, the UM analysis indicates that the model's performance improves as the temporal variability in extremes of the combined features decreases across 1 to 16 days. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the LSTM model's performance in discharge prediction, emphasising the impact of the variability in the extremes of combined features through the scale-independent interpretation. These findings will offer valuable insights for stakeholders to improve flood risk management across the LMB. © 2025 The Authors

The efficient and rational development of hydropower in the Lancang–Mekong River Basin can promote green energy transition, reduce carbon emissions, prevent and mitigate flood and drought disasters, and ensure the sustainable development of the entire basin. In this study, based on publicly available hydrometeorological observation data and satellite remote sensing monitoring data from 2001 to 2020, a machine learning model of the Lancang–Mekong Basin was developed to reconstruct the basin’s hydrological processes, and identify the occurrence patterns and influencing mechanisms of water-related hazards. The results show that, against the background of climate change, the Lancang–Mekong Basin is affected by the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events. In particular, Rx1day, Rx5day, R10mm, and R95p (extreme precipitation indicators determined by the World Meteorological Organization’s Expert Group on Climate Change Monitoring and Extreme Climate Events) in the northwestern part of the Mekong River Basin show upward trends, with the average maximum daily rainfall increasing by 1.8 mm/year and the total extreme precipitation increasing by 18 mm/year on average. The risks of flood and drought disasters will continue to rise. The flood peak period is mainly concentrated in August and September, with the annual maximum flood peak ranging from 5600 to 8500 m3/s. The Stung Treng Station exhibits longer drought duration, greater severity, and higher peak intensity than the Chiang Saen and Pakse Stations. At the Pakse Station, climate change and hydropower development have altered the non-drought proportion by −12.50% and +15.90%, respectively. For the Chiang Saen Station, the fragmentation degree of the drought index time series under the baseline, naturalized, and hydropower development scenarios is 0.901, 1.16, and 0.775, respectively. These results indicate that hydropower development has effectively reduced the frequency of rapid drought–flood transitions within the basin, thereby alleviating pressure on drought management efforts. The regulatory role of the cascade reservoirs in the Lancang River can mitigate risks posed by climate change, weaken adverse effects, reduce flood peak flows, alleviate hydrological droughts in the dry season, and decrease flash drought–flood transitions in the basin. The research findings can enable basin managers to proactively address climate change, develop science-based technical pathways for hydropower dispatch, and formulate adaptive disaster prevention and mitigation strategies. © 2025 by the authors.

Flood risk assessment (FRA) is a process of evaluating potential flood damage by considering vulnerability of exposed elements and consequences of flood events through risk analysis which recommends the mitigation measures to reduce the impact of floods. This flood risk analysis is a technique used to identify and rank the level of flood risk through modeling and spatial analysis. In the present study, Musi River in the Osmansagar basin is taken in to consideration to evaluate the flood risk, which is located at Hyderabad. The input data collected for the study encompasses Hydrological and Meteorological datasets from Gandipet Guage station in Hyderabad, raster grid data for Osmansagar basin along with several indicators data influencing flood vulnerability. The primary research objective is to conduct a quantitative assessment of the Flood vulnerability index (FVI), to develop a comprehensive flood risk map and to evaluate the magnitude of damaging flood parameters, inundated volume and to analyze the regions inundated in the study area. In risk analysis, FVI determines the degree of which an area is susceptible to the negative impact of flood through various influencing indicators, Flood hazard map segregate the regions based on flood risk level through spatial analysis in Arc-GIS. A part of this study includes an integrated methodology for assessing flood inundation using Quantum Geographic Information Systems (QGIS) data modelling for spatial analysis, Hydraulic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) hydraulic modelling for unsteady flow analysis and a machine learning technique i.e. XGBoost, to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of flood risk assessment. Subsequently, inundation map produced using HEC-RAS is superimposed with building footprints to identify vulnerable structures. The results obtained by risk analysis using hydraulic modeling, GIS analysis, and machine learning technique illustrates the flood vulnerability, areas having high flood risk and inundated volume along with predicted flood levels for next 10 years. These findings demonstrate the efficiency of the holistic approach in identifying vulnerability, flood-prone areas and evaluating potential impacts on infrastructure and communities. The outcomes of the study assist the decision-makers to gain valuable insights into flood risk management strategies. © The Author(s) 2025.

Extreme weather events (EWEs), including floods, droughts, heatwaves and storms, are increasingly recognised as major drivers of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. In this systematic review, we synthesise 251 studies documenting the impacts of extreme weather events on freshwater, terrestrial and marine ecosystems, with the goal of informing effective conservation and management strategies for areas of special conservation or protection focus in Ireland.Twenty-two of the reviewed studies included Irish ecosystems. In freshwater systems, flooding (34 studies) was the most studied EWE, often linked to declines in species richness, abundance and ecosystem function. In terrestrial ecosystems, studies predominantly addressed droughts (60 studies) and extreme temperatures (48 studies), with impacts including increase in mortality, decline in growth and shift in species composition. Marine and coastal studies focused largely on storm events (33 studies), highlighting physical damages linked to wave actions, behavioural changes in macrofauna, changes in species composition and distribution, and loss in habitat cover. Results indicate that most EWEs lead to negative ecological responses, although responses are context specific.While positive responses to EWEs are rare, species with adaptive traits displayed some resilience, especially in ecosystems with high biodiversity or refuge areas.These findings underscore the need for conservation strategies that incorporate EWE projections, particularly for protected habitats and species. © 2025 Royal Irish Academy. All rights reserved.

AbstractThe frequency and severity of floods has increased in different regions of the world due to climate change. Although the impact of floods on human health has been extensively studied, the increase in the segments of the population that are likely to be impacted by floods in the future makes it necessary to examine how adaptation measures impact the mental health of individuals affected by these natural disasters. The goal of this scoping review is to document the existing studies on flood adaptation measures and their impact on the mental health of affected populations, in order to identify the best preventive strategies as well as limitations that deserve further exploration. This study employed the methodology of the PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews to systematically search the databases Medline and Web of Science to identify studies that examined the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of flood victims. The database queries resulted in a total of 857 records from both databases. Following two rounds of screening, 9 studies were included for full-text analysis. Most of the analyzed studies sought to identify the factors that drive resilience in flood victims, particularly in the context of social capital (6 studies), whereas the remaining studies analyzed the impact of external interventions on the mental health of flood victims, either from preventive or post-disaster measures (3 studies). There is a very limited number of studies that analyze the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of populations and individuals affected by floods, which complicates the generalizability of their findings. There is a need for public health policies and guidelines for the development of flood adaptation measures that adequately consider a social component that can be used to support the mental health of flood victims.

<p><strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Year-round river discharge estimation and forecasting is a critical component of sustainable water resource management. However, in cold climate regions such as Canada, this basic task gets intricated due to the challenge of river ice conditions. River ice conditions are dynamic and can change quickly in a short period of time. This dynamic nature makes river ice conditions difficult to forecast. Moreover, the observation of under-ice river discharge also remains a challenge since no reliable method for its estimation has been developed till date. It is therefore an active field of research and development. The integration of river ice hydraulic models in forecasting systems has remained relatively uncommon. The current study has two main objectives: first is to demonstrate the development and capabilities of a river ice forecasting system based on coupled hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach for the Chaudi&egrave;re River in Qu&eacute;bec; and second is to assess its functionality over selected winter events. The forecasting system is developed within a well-known operational forecasting platform: the Delft Flood Early Warning System (Delft-FEWS). The current configuration of the systems integrates (i) meteorological products such as the Regional Ensemble Prediction System (REPS); (ii) a hydrological module implemented through the HydrOlOgical Prediction LAboratory (HOOPLA), a multi-model based hydrological modelling framework; and (iii) hydraulic module implemented through a 1D steady and unsteady HEC-RAS river ice models. The system produces ensemble forecasts for discharge and water level and provides flexibility to modify various dynamic parameters within the modelling chain such as discharge timeseries, ice thickness, ice roughness as well as carryout hindcasting experiments in a batch production way. Performance of the coupled modelling approach was assessed using &ldquo;Perfect forecast&rdquo; over winter events between 2020 and 2023 winter seasons. The root mean square error (RMSE) and percent bias (Pbias) metrics were calculated. The hydrologic module of the system showed significant deviations from the observations. These deviations could be explained by the inherent uncertainty in the under-ice discharge estimates as well as uncertainty in the modelling chain. The hydraulic module of the system performed better and the Pbias was within &plusmn;10 %.</p>

This paper presents a new framework for floodplain inundation modeling in an ungauged basin using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) imagery. This method is based on the integrated analysis of high-resolution ortho-images and elevation data produced by the structure from motion (SfM) technology. To this end, the Flood-Level Marks (FLMs) were created from high-resolution UAV ortho-images and compared to the flood inundated areas simulated using the HEC-RAS hydraulic model. The flood quantiles for 25, 50, 100, and 200 return periods were then estimated by synthetic hydrographs using the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The proposed method was applied to UAV image data collected from the Khosban village, in Taleghan County, Iran, in the ungauged sub-basin of the Khosban River. The study area is located along one kilometre of the river in the middle of the village. The results showed that the flood inundation areas modeled by the HEC-RAS were 33%, 19%, and 8% less than those estimated from the UAV’s FLMs for 25, 50, and 100 years return periods, respectively. For return periods of 200 years, this difference was overestimated by more than 6%, compared to the UAV’s FLM. The maximum flood depth in our four proposed scenarios of hydraulic models varied between 2.33 to 2.83 meters. These analyses showed that this method, based on the UAV imagery, is well suited to improve the hydraulic modeling for seasonal inundation in ungauged rivers, thus providing reliable support to flood mitigation strategies

Geohazards associated with the dynamics of the liquid and solid water of the Earth’s hydrosphere, such as floods and glacial processes, may pose significant risks to populations, activities and properties [...]

Résumé L'hydrogéomorphologie étudie la dynamique des rivières en se concentrant sur les interactions liant la structure des écoulements, la mobilisation et le transport des sédiments et les morphologies qui caractérisent les cours d'eau et leur bassin‐versant. Elle offre un cadre d'analyse et des outils pour une meilleure intégration des connaissances sur la dynamique des rivières pour la gestion des cours d'eau au sens large, et plus spécifiquement, pour leur restauration, leur aménagement et pour l'évaluation et la prévention des risques liés aux aléas fluviaux. Au Québec, l'hydrogéomorphologie émerge comme contribution significative dans les approches de gestion et d'évaluation du risque et se trouve au cœur d'un changement de paradigme dans la gestion des cours d'eau par lequel la restauration des processus vise à augmenter la résilience des systèmes et des sociétés et à améliorer la qualité des environnements fluviaux. Cette contribution expose la trajectoire de l'hydrogéomorphologie au Québec à partir des publications scientifiques de géographes du Québec et discute des visées de la discipline en recherche et en intégration des connaissances pour la gestion des cours d'eau . , Abstract Hydrogeomorphology studies river dynamics, focusing on the interactions between flow structure, sediment transport, and the morphologies that characterize rivers and their watersheds. It provides an analytical framework and tools for better integrating knowledge of river dynamics into river management in the broadest sense, and more specifically, into river restoration as well as into the assessment and prevention of risks associated with fluvial hazards. In Quebec, hydrogeomorphology is emerging as a significant contribution to risk assessment and management approaches, and is at the heart of a paradigm shift in river management whereby process restoration aims to increase the resilience of fluvial systems and societies, and improve the quality of fluvial environments. This contribution outlines the trajectory of hydrogeomorphology in Quebec, based on scientific publications by Quebec geographers, and discusses the discipline's aims in research and knowledge integration for river management . , Messages clés Les géographes du Québec ont contribué fortement au développement des connaissances et outils de l'hydrogéomorphologie. L'hydrogéomorphologie a évolué d'une science fondamentale à une science où les connaissances fondamentales sont au service de la gestion des cours d'eau. L'hydrogéomorphologie et le cortège de connaissances et d'outils qu'elle promeut font de cette discipline une partenaire clé pour une gestion holistique des cours d'eau.

Atmospheric reanalysis data provides a numerical description of global and regional water cycles by combining models and observations. These datasets are increasingly valuable as a substitute for observations in regions where these are scarce. They could significantly contribute to reducing losses by feeding flood early warning systems that can inform the population and guide civil security action. We assessed the suitability of two different precipitation and temperature reanalysis products readily available for predicting historic flooding of the La Chaudière River in Quebec: 1) Environment and Climate Change Canada's Regional Deterministic Reanalysis System (RDRS-v2) and 2) ERA5 from the Copernicus Climate Change Service. We exploited a multi-model hydrological ensemble prediction system that considers three sources of uncertainty: initial conditions, model structure, and weather forcing to produce streamflow forecasts up to 5 days into the future with a time step of 3 hours. These results are compared to a provincial reference product based on gauge measurements of the Ministère de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les Changements Climatiques. Then, five conceptual hydrological models were calibrated with three different meteorological datasets (RDRS-v2, ERA5, and observational gridded) and fed with two ensemble weather forecast products: 1) the Regional Ensemble Prediction System (REPS) from the Environment and Climate Change Canada and 2) the ensemble forecast issued by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Results reveal that the calibration of the model with reanalysis data as input delivered a higher accuracy in the streamflow simulation providing a useful resource for flood modeling where no other data is available. However, although the selection of the reanalysis is a determinant of capturing the flood volumes, selecting weather forecasts is more critical in anticipating discharge threshold exceedances.

AbstractIn this time of a changing climate, it is important to know whether lake levels will rise, potentially causing flooding, or river flows will dry up during abnormally dry weather. The Great Lakes region is the largest freshwater lake system in the world. Moreover, agriculture, industry, commerce, and shipping are active in this densely populated region. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) recently implemented the Water Cycle Prediction System (WCPS) over the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River watershed (WCPS-GLS version 1.0) following a decade of research and development. WCPS, a network of linked models, simulates the complete water cycle, following water as it moves from the atmosphere to the surface, through the river network and into lakes, and back to the atmosphere. Information concerning the water cycle is passed between the models. WCPS is the first short-to-medium-range prediction system of the complete water cycle to be run on an operational basis anywhere. It currently produces ...

The Hudson Bay basin is a large contributor of freshwater input in the Arctic Ocean and is also an area affected by destructive spring floods. In this study, the hydrological model MESH (Modelisation Environmentale Communautaire - Surface and hydrology) was set up for the Groundhog River watershed situated in the Hudson Bay basin, to simulate the future evolution of streamflow and annual maximum streamflow. MESH was forced by meteorological data from ERA5 reanalyses in the historical period (1979–2018) and 12 models of the Coupled model intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) downscaled with the Canadian Regional Climate model version 5 (CRCM5) in historical (1979–2005) and scenario period (2006–2098). The projections consistently indicate an earlier spring flow and a reduction in the amount of annual maximum streamflow by the end of the 21st century. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, the annual maximum streamflow occurring in the spring is expected to be advanced by 2 weeks and reduced on average from 852 m3/s (±265) in the historical period (1979–2018) to 717m3/s (±250) by the end of the 21st century (2059–2098). Because the seasonal projection of streamflow was not investigated in previous studies, this work is an important first step to assess the seasonal change of streamflow in the Hudson Bay region under climate change.

Fluvial systems in southern Ontario are regularly affected by widespread early-spring flood events primarily caused by rain-on-snow events. Recent studies have shown an increase in winter floods in this region due to increasing winter temperature and precipitation. Streamflow simulations are associated with uncertainties mainly due to the different scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions, global climate models (GCMs) or the choice of the hydrological model. The internal variability of climate, defined as the chaotic variability of atmospheric circulation due to natural internal processes within the climate system, is also a source of uncertainties to consider. Uncertainties of internal variability can be assessed using hydrological models fed by downscaled data of a global climate model large ensemble (GCM-LE), but GCM outputs have too coarse of a scale to be used in hydrological modeling. The Canadian Regional Climate Model Large Ensemble (CRCM5-LE), a 50-member ensemble downscaled from the Canadian Earth System Model version 2 Large Ensemble (CanESM2-LE), was developed to simulate local climate variability over northeastern North America under different future climate scenarios. In this study, CRCM5-LE temperature and precipitation projections under an RCP8.5 scenario were used as input in the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) to simulate streamflow at a near-future horizon (2026–2055) for four watersheds in southern Ontario. To investigate the role of the internal variability of climate in the modulation of streamflow, the 50 members were first grouped in classes of similar projected change in January–February streamflow and temperature and precipitation between 1961–1990 and 2026–2055. Then, the regional change in geopotential height (Z500) from CanESM2-LE was calculated for each class. Model simulations showed an average January–February increase in streamflow of 18&thinsp;% (±8.7) in Big Creek, 30.5&thinsp;% (±10.8) in Grand River, 29.8&thinsp;% (±10.4) in Thames River and 31.2&thinsp;% (±13.3) in Credit River. A total of 14&thinsp;% of all ensemble members projected positive Z500 anomalies in North America's eastern coast enhancing rain, snowmelt and streamflow volume in January–February. For these members the increase of streamflow is expected to be as high as 31.6&thinsp;% (±8.1) in Big Creek, 48.3&thinsp;% (±11.1) in Grand River, 47&thinsp;% (±9.6) in Thames River and 53.7&thinsp;% (±15) in Credit River. Conversely, 14&thinsp;% of the ensemble projected negative Z500 anomalies in North America's eastern coast and were associated with a much lower increase in streamflow: 8.3&thinsp;% (±7.8) in Big Creek, 18.8&thinsp;% (±5.8) in Grand River, 17.8&thinsp;% (±6.4) in Thames River and 18.6&thinsp;% (±6.5) in Credit River. These results provide important information to researchers, managers, policymakers and society about the expected ranges of increase in winter streamflow in a highly populated region of Canada, and they will help to explain how the internal variability of climate is expected to modulate the future streamflow in this region.