Votre recherche

Abstract A modified hybrid terrain-following vertical coordinate has recently been implemented within the Global Environmental Multiscale atmospheric model that introduces separately controlled height-dependent progressive decaying of the small- and large-scale orography contributions on the vertical coordinate surfaces. The new vertical coordinate allows for a faster decay of the finescale orography imprints on the coordinate surfaces with increasing height while relaxing the compression of the lowest model levels over complex terrain. A number of tests carried out—including experiments involving Environment and Climate Change Canada’s operational regional and global deterministic prediction systems—demonstrate that the new vertical coordinate effectively eliminates terrain-induced spurious generation and amplification of upper-air vertical motion and kinetic energy without increasing the computational cost. Results also show potential improvements in precipitation over complex terrain.

Abstract. Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test and compare the simulated outputs of various model setups over the same study domain. The Great Lakes region is such a domain of high public interest as it not only resembles a challenging region to model with its transboundary location, strong lake effects, and regions of strong human impact but is also one of the most densely populated areas in the USA and Canada. This study brought together a wide range of researchers setting up their models of choice in a highly standardized experimental setup using the same geophysical datasets, forcings, common routing product, and locations of performance evaluation across the 1×106 km2 study domain. The study comprises 13 models covering a wide range of model types from machine-learning-based, basin-wise, subbasin-based, and gridded models that are either locally or globally calibrated or calibrated for one of each of the six predefined regions of the watershed. Unlike most hydrologically focused model intercomparisons, this study not only compares models regarding their capability to simulate streamflow (Q) but also evaluates the quality of simulated actual evapotranspiration (AET), surface soil moisture (SSM), and snow water equivalent (SWE). The latter three outputs are compared against gridded reference datasets. The comparisons are performed in two ways – either by aggregating model outputs and the reference to basin level or by regridding all model outputs to the reference grid and comparing the model simulations at each grid-cell. The main results of this study are as follows: The comparison of models regarding streamflow reveals the superior quality of the machine-learning-based model in the performance of all experiments; even for the most challenging spatiotemporal validation, the machine learning (ML) model outperforms any other physically based model. While the locally calibrated models lead to good performance in calibration and temporal validation (even outperforming several regionally calibrated models), they lose performance when they are transferred to locations that the model has not been calibrated on. This is likely to be improved with more advanced strategies to transfer these models in space. The regionally calibrated models – while losing less performance in spatial and spatiotemporal validation than locally calibrated models – exhibit low performances in highly regulated and urban areas and agricultural regions in the USA. Comparisons of additional model outputs (AET, SSM, and SWE) against gridded reference datasets show that aggregating model outputs and the reference dataset to the basin scale can lead to different conclusions than a comparison at the native grid scale. The latter is deemed preferable, especially for variables with large spatial variability such as SWE. A multi-objective-based analysis of the model performances across all variables (Q, AET, SSM, and SWE) reveals overall well-performing locally calibrated models (i.e., HYMOD2-lumped) and regionally calibrated models (i.e., MESH-SVS-Raven and GEM-Hydro-Watroute) due to varying reasons. The machine-learning-based model was not included here as it is not set up to simulate AET, SSM, and SWE. All basin-aggregated model outputs and observations for the model variables evaluated in this study are available on an interactive website that enables users to visualize results and download the data and model outputs.

Abstract Streamflow sensitivity to different hydrologic processes varies in both space and time. This sensitivity is traditionally evaluated for the parameters specific to a given hydrologic model simulating streamflow. In this study, we apply a novel analysis over more than 3000 basins across North America considering a blended hydrologic model structure, which includes not only parametric, but also structural uncertainties. This enables seamless quantification of model process sensitivities and parameter sensitivities across a continuous set of models. It also leads to high-level conclusions about the importance of water cycle components on streamflow predictions, such as quickflow being the most sensitive process for streamflow simulations across the North American continent. The results of the 3000 basins are used to derive an approximation of sensitivities based on physiographic and climatologic data without the need to perform expensive sensitivity analyses. Detailed spatio-temporal inputs and results are shared through an interactive website.

Abstract A warmer climate impacts streamflows and these changes need to be quantified to assess future risk, vulnerability, and to implement efficient adaptation measures. The climate simulations from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which have been the basis of most such assessments over the past decade, are being gradually superseded by the more recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Our study portrays the added value of the CMIP6 ensemble over CMIP5 in a first North America wide comparison using 3,107 catchments. Results show a reduced spread of the CMIP6 ensemble compared to the CMIP5 ensemble for temperature and precipitation projections. In terms of flow indicators, the CMIP6 driven hydrological projections result in a smaller spread of future mean and high flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that the CMIP6 ensemble provides a narrower band of uncertainty of future climate projections, bringing more confidence for hydrological impact studies. , Plain Language Summary Greenhouse gas emissions are causing the climate to warm significantly, which in turn impacts flows in rivers worldwide. To adapt to these changes, it is essential to quantify them and assess future risk and vulnerability. Climate models are the primary tools used to achieve this. The main data set that provides scientists with state‐of‐the‐art climate model simulations is known as the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The fifth phase of that project (CMIP5) has been used over the past decade in multiple hydrological studies to assess the impacts of climate change on streamflow. The more recent sixth phase (CMIP6) has started to generate projections, which brings the following question: is it necessary to update the hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the new CMIP6 models? To answer this question, a comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 using 3,107 catchments over North America was conducted. Results show that there is less spread in temperature and precipitation projections for CMIP6. This translates into a smaller spread of future mean, high and low flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that using the CMIP6 data set would provide a more concerted range of future climate projections, leading to more confident hydrological impact studies. , Key Points A comparison of hydrological impacts using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 5 (CMIP5) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) ensembles is performed over 3,107 catchments in North America The CMIP6 ensembles provide a narrower band of uncertainty for hydrological indicators in the future It is recommended to update hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the CMIP6 ensemble

Climate change has a significant influence on streamflow variation. The aim of this study is to quantify different sources of uncertainties in future streamflow projections due to climate change. For this purpose, 4 global climate models, 3 greenhouse gas emission scenarios (representative concentration pathways), 6 downscaling models, and a hydrologic model (UBCWM) are used. The assessment work is conducted for 2 different future time periods (2036 to 2065 and 2066 to 2095). Generalized extreme value distribution is used for the analysis of the flow frequency. Strathcona dam in the Campbell River basin, British Columbia, Canada, is used as a case study. The results show that the downscaling models contribute the highest amount of uncertainty to future streamflow predictions when compared to the contributions by global climate models or representative concentration pathways. It is also observed that the summer flows into Strathcona dam will decrease, and winter flows will increase in both future time periods. In addition to these, the flow magnitude becomes more uncertain for higher return periods in the Campbell River system under climate change.

La modélisation numérique des estuaires hypertidaux intéresse particulièrement les ingénieurs impliqués dans la navigation maritime et le développement de projets d'énergie marémotrice. Au Québec (Canada), la majorité de ces estuaires à marée extrême sont situés dans des régions isolée de l'Arctique canadien et sont souvent des lieux de résidence des communautés autochtones du Nord canadien. La présente thèse vise à mieux comprendre les processus se manifestent dans ces environnements, avec une emphase particulière sur l'importance (1) de la forte dominance des marées, (2) de l'extrême variabilité bathymétrique et (3) de l'immense forçage climatique. La thèse tente de démontrer comment les modèles numériques peuvent être utilisés pour traiter ces particularités et peuvent être la meilleure méthode disponible pour étudier leurs effets dans des environnements éloignés peu étudies. Premièrement, dans le but d'évaluer le potentiel de courant de marée en eau libre (sans glace) de l'estuaire hypertidal de la rivière Koksoak (KRE), nous avons modélisé le débit de marée en utilisant un model numérique hydrodynamique réputé (Delft3D). Différents aspects de l'hydrodynamique côtière ont été étudiés grâce à la modélisation numérique 1D2D-3D. La variabilité spatio-temporelle de la densité de puissance hydrocinétique disponible a ensuite été quantifiée. Les résultats ont révélé l'énorme potentiel (1000 MW) d'énergie marémotrice présente à plusieurs endroits le long de l'estuaire, ce qui nécessite des études numériques plus approfondies. En mettant davantage l'accent sur la modélisation numérique du site, par exemple la publication d'un Atlas des courants de marée pour aider à la navigation maritime dans le KRE, nous avons constaté que certains problèmes de modélisation des estuaires n'étaient pas abordés. Compte tenu des conditions limites précises et des mesures in situ recueillies au cours de l'hiver 2017-2018, nous avons constaté que les meilleurs résultats pour l'étalonnage du modèle (niveau d'eau) en utilisant les paramètres/options disponibles conduisaient encore à certains ordres d'imprécision. sur les conditions aux limites de formse qualité (campagnes 2017-2018) qui ont effectivement amélioré les résultats numériques, nous avons constaté que les meilleurs résultats pour l'étalonnage du modèle (niveau d'eau) en utilisant les paramètres/options disponibles étaient encore associés à certains ordres d'imprécision. Par conséquent, l'objectif du deuxième travail était d'améliorer l'efficacité de la modélisation hydrodynamique pour les environnements de marée peu profonde. Nous avons introduit quelques hypothèses décrivant pourquoi les modèles de turbulence et de rugosité disponibles ne sont pas bien adaptés à la modélisation des estuaires avec de fortes variabilités spatiales et temporelles des profondeurs de marée. En conséquence (i) un modèle de turbulence k-ε étendu pour la paramétrisation adaptative de la viscosité turbulente en fonction de la profondeur, et une approche basée sur la direction de l'écoulement pour la paramétrisation de la rugosité du lit ont été développés, incorporés dans le modèle hydrodynamique employé (Delft3D). Le modèle modifié a montré une amélioration constante des prévisions du modèle dans les stations de champ proche et de champ lointain, par rapport aux schémas de paramétrage classiques. Enfin, un aspect manquant et mal compris des estuaires de latitude nordique est l'immense impact de l'hiver sur le flux des marées. Situé à la latitude 58°, le KRE subit l'effet intensif du climat arctique pendant la majeure partie de l'année, ce qui entraîne la formation de glace estuarienne rapide sur une grande partie de sa longueur. Plus précisément, et ce qui est le plus pertinent pour cette recherche, il est important de savoir comment le long hiver affecte les potentiels hydrocinétiques des estuaires des régions froides. Ainsi, la surfusion entraîne la formation de frasil et de glace de fond qui peuvent adhérer aux pales des turbines et provoquer leur dysfonctionnement. Dans les estuaires, la surfusion a une nature transitoire complexe car le point de congélation de l'eau salée est une fonction de la salinité et de la profondeur qui est changée par les marées au cours des cycles de marée. En raison du manque de données de terrain en hiver, nous avons collecté des paramètres hydrodynamiques en utilisant de nouvelles campagne de mesures en hiver 2018. Les observations ont montré que le risque de surfusion diminue à l'intérieur de l'estuaire, car en l'absence de débit fluvial, la salinité peut s'infiltrer beaucoup plus loin dans le fleuve. À l'intérieur, une modulation apparente de ∆T (la différence entre la température de l'eau et la température de congélation de l'eau), dépendant de la marée, a été observée avec une augmentation de la température pendant des marées montantes. Cette augmentation retarderait la surfusion, ce qui est un avantage majeur pour turbines. En réglant le module Delft3D-Ice, différents scénarios ont été définis pour l'étendue et l'épaisseur de la couvert de glace, et leurs réponses hydrodynamiques ont été analysées. Il a été démontré que la glace a des impacts complexes et non uniformes sur les caractéristiques hydrodynamiques de la KRE. Surtout, le débit des prismes de marée, qui est la principale source d'élan, peut être modifiée de manière démonstrative par la couverture de glace et la glace de marée plate. Les résultats suggèrent que les zones énergétiques sont légèrement affectées par la glace pendant la plus grande partie de l'hiver. Pendant l'hiver de pointe seulement, la glace pourrait considérablement diminuer densité moyenne de puissance des courants (par exemple, la puissance moyenne est égale ou supérieure à 7 kW m-2). Ces implications cryohydrodynamiques indiquent que l'hiver arctique n'est pas un obstacle à la production d'électricité dans le fleuve Koksoak, et l'énergie marémotrice serait un avantage annuel pour Kuujjuaq

The Canadian Sea Ice and Snow Evolution (CanSISE) Network is a climate research network focused on developing and applying state of the art observational data to advance dynamical prediction, projections, and understanding of seasonal snow cover and sea ice in Canada and the circumpolar Arctic. Here, we present an assessment from the CanSISE Network on trends in the historical record of snow cover (fraction, water equivalent) and sea ice (area, concentration, type, and thickness) across Canada. We also assess projected changes in snow cover and sea ice likely to occur by mid-century, as simulated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) suite of Earth system models. The historical datasets show that the fraction of Canadian land and marine areas covered by snow and ice is decreasing over time, with seasonal and regional variability in the trends consistent with regional differences in surface temperature trends. In particular, summer sea ice cover has decreased significantly across nearly all Canadian marine regions, and the rate of multi-year ice loss in the Beaufort Sea and Canadian Arctic Archipelago has nearly doubled over the last 8 years. The multi-model consensus over the 2020–2050 period shows reductions in fall and spring snow cover fraction and sea ice concentration of 5–10% per decade (or 15–30% in total), with similar reductions in winter sea ice concentration in both Hudson Bay and eastern Canadian waters. Peak pre-melt terrestrial snow water equivalent reductions of up to 10% per decade (30% in total) are projected across southern Canada.

Abstract. Efficient adaptation strategies to climate change require the estimation of future impacts and the uncertainty surrounding this estimation. Over- or underestimating future uncertainty may lead to maladaptation. Hydrological impact studies typically use a top-down approach in which multiple climate models are used to assess the uncertainty related to the climate model structure and climate sensitivity. Despite ongoing debate, impact modelers have typically embraced the concept of “model democracy”, in which each climate model is considered equally fit. The newer Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations, with several models showing a climate sensitivity larger than that of Phase 5 (CMIP5) and larger than the likely range based on past climate information and understanding of planetary physics, have reignited the model democracy debate. Some have suggested that “hot” models be removed from impact studies to avoid skewing impact results toward unlikely futures. Indeed, the inclusion of these models in impact studies carries a significant risk of overestimating the impact of climate change. This large-sample study looks at the impact of removing hot models on the projections of future streamflow over 3107 North American catchments. More precisely, the variability in future projections of mean, high, and low flows is evaluated using an ensemble of 19 CMIP6 general circulation models (GCMs), 5 of which are deemed hot based on their global equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The results show that the reduced ensemble of 14 climate models provides streamflow projections with reduced future variability for Canada, Alaska, the Southeast US, and along the Pacific coast. Elsewhere, the reduced ensemble has either no impact or results in increased variability in future streamflow, indicating that global outlier climate models do not necessarily provide regional outlier projections of future impacts. These results emphasize the delicate nature of climate model selection, especially based on global fitness metrics that may not be appropriate for local and regional assessments.

Abstract An alternate dynamical core that employs the unified equations of A. Arakawa and C.S. Konor (2009) has been developed within Environment and Climate change Canada’s GEM (Global Environmental Multiscale) atmospheric model. As in the operational GEM dynamical core, the novel core utilizes the same fully-implicit two-time-level semi-Lagrangian scheme for time discretization while the log-pressure-based terrain-following vertical coordinate has been slightly adapted. Overall, the new dynamical core implementation required only minor changes to the existing informatics code of the GEM model and from a computational performance perspective, the new core does not incur any significant additional cost. A broad range of tests – that include both two-dimensional idealized theoretical cases and three-dimensional deterministic forecasts covering both hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic scales–have been carried out to evaluate the performance of the new dynamical core. For all the tested cases, when compared to the operational GEM model, the new dynamical core based on the unified equations has been found to produce statistically equivalent results. These results imply that the unified equations can be adopted for operational numerical weather prediction that would employ a single soundproof system of equations to produce reliable forecasts for all meteorological scales of interest with negligible changes for the computational overhead.

The Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ET0) formulation was forced with humidity, radiation, and wind speed (HRW) fields simulated by four reanalyses in order to simulate hydrologic processes over six mid-sized nivo-pluvial watersheds in southern Quebec, Canada. The resulting simulated hydrologic response is comparable to an empirical ET0 formulation based exclusively on air temperature. However, Penman-Montheith provides a sounder representation of the existing relations between evapotranspiration fluctuations and climate drivers. Correcting HRW fields significantly improves the hydrologic bias over the pluvial period (June to November). The latter did not translate into an increase of the hydrologic performance according to the Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) metric. The suggested approach allows for the implementation of physically-based ET0 formulations where HRW observations are insufficient for the calibration and validation of hydrologic models and a potential reinforcement of the confidence affecting the projection of low flow regimes and water availability.

Abstract In water resources applications (e.g., streamflow, rainfall‐runoff, urban water demand [UWD], etc.), ensemble member selection and ensemble member weighting are two difficult yet important tasks in the development of ensemble forecasting systems. We propose and test a stochastic data‐driven ensemble forecasting framework that uses archived deterministic forecasts as input and results in probabilistic water resources forecasts. In addition to input data and (ensemble) model output uncertainty, the proposed approach integrates both ensemble member selection and weighting uncertainties, using input variable selection and data‐driven methods, respectively. Therefore, it does not require one to perform ensemble member selection and weighting separately. We applied the proposed forecasting framework to a previous real‐world case study in Montreal, Canada, to forecast daily UWD at multiple lead times. Using wavelet‐based forecasts as input data, we develop the Ensemble Wavelet‐Stochastic Data‐Driven Forecasting Framework, the first multiwavelet ensemble stochastic forecasting framework that produces probabilistic forecasts. For the considered case study, several variants of Ensemble Wavelet‐Stochastic Data‐Driven Forecasting Framework, produced using different input variable selection methods (partial correlation input selection and Edgeworth Approximations‐based conditional mutual information) and data‐driven models (multiple linear regression, extreme learning machines, and second‐order Volterra series models), are shown to outperform wavelet‐ and nonwavelet‐based benchmarks, especially during a heat wave (first time studied in the UWD forecasting literature). , Key Points A stochastic data‐driven ensemble framework is introduced for probabilistic water resources forecasting Ensemble member selection and weighting uncertainties are explicitly considered alongside input data and model output uncertainties Wavelet‐based model outputs are used as input to the framework for an urban water demand forecasting study outperforming benchmark methods

This is a review article invited by Atmosphere-Ocean to document the contributions of Recherche en Prévision Numérique (RPN) to Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP). It is structured as a historical review and documents RPN’s contributions to numerical methods, numerical modelling, data assimilation, and ensemble systems, with a look ahead to potential future systems. Through this review, we highlight the evolution of RPN’s contributions. We begin with early NWP efforts and continue through to environmental predictions with a broad range of applications. This synthesis is intended to be a helpful reference, consolidating developments and generating broader interest for future work on NWP in Canada.

This dataset contains key characteristics about the data described in the Data Descriptor A comprehensive, multisource database for hydrometeorological modeling of 14,425 North American watersheds. <br> Contents: <br> 1. human readable metadata summary table in CSV format 2. machine readable metadata file in JSON format <br> <br> <br>

This dataset contains key characteristics about the data described in the Data Descriptor A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records. <br> Contents: <br> 1. human readable metadata summary table in CSV format 2. machine readable metadata file in JSON format <br> <br> <br>

This study details the enhancement and calibration of the Arctic implementation of the HYdrological Predictions for the Environment (HYPE) hydrological model established for the BaySys group of projects to produce freshwater discharge scenarios for the Hudson Bay Drainage Basin (HBDB). The challenge in producing estimates of freshwater discharge for the HBDB is that it spans over a third of Canada’s continental landmass and is 40% ungauged. Scenarios for BaySys require the separation between human and climate interactions, specifically the separation of regulated river discharge from a natural, climate-driven response. We present three key improvements to the modelling system required to support the identification of natural from anthropogenic impacts: representation of prairie disconnected landscapes (i.e., non-contributing areas), a method to generalize lake storage-discharge parameters across large regions, and frozen soil modifications. Additionally, a unique approach to account for irregular hydrometric gauge density across the basins during model calibration is presented that avoids overfitting parameters to the densely gauged southern regions. We summarize our methodologies used to facilitate improved separation of human and climate driven impacts to streamflow within the basin and outline the baseline discharge simulations used for the BaySys group of projects. Challenges remain for modeling the most northern reaches of the basin, and in the lake-dominated watersheds. The techniques presented in this work, particularly the lake and flow signature clusters, may be applied to other high latitude, ungauged Arctic basins. Discharge simulations are subsequently used as input data for oceanographic, biogeochemical, and ecosystem studies across the HBDB.

Abstract Ensemble forecasting applied to the field of hydrology is currently an established area of research embracing a broad spectrum of operational situations. This work catalogs the various pathways of ensemble streamflow forecasting based on an exhaustive review of more than 700 studies over the last 40 years. We focus on the advanced state of the art in the model‐based (dynamical) ensemble forecasting approaches. Ensemble streamflow prediction systems are categorized into three leading classes: statistics‐based streamflow prediction systems, climatology‐based ensemble streamflow prediction systems and numerical weather prediction‐based hydrological ensemble prediction systems. For each ensemble approach, technical information, as well as details about its strengths and weaknesses, are provided based on a critical review of the studies listed. Through this literature review, the performance and uncertainty associated with the ensemble forecasting systems are underlined from both operational and scientific viewpoints. Finally, the remaining key challenges and prospective future research directions are presented, notably through hybrid dynamical ‐ statistical learning approaches, which obviously present new challenges to be overcome in order to allow the successful employment of ensemble streamflow forecasting systems in the next decades. Targeting students, researchers and practitioners, this review provides a detailed perspective on the major features of an increasingly important area of hydrological forecasting. , Key Points This work summarizes the 40 years of research in the generation of streamflow forecasts based on an exhaustive review of studies Ensemble prediction systems are categorized into three classes: statistics‐based, climatology‐based and numerical weather prediction‐based hydrological ensemble prediction systems For each ensemble forecasting system, thorough technical information is provided

Abstract Groundwater quality modelling plays an important role in water resources management decision making processes. Accordingly, models must be developed to account for the uncertainty inherent in the modelling process, from the sample measurement stage through to the data interpretation stages. Artificial intelligence models, particularly fuzzy inference systems (FIS), have been shown to be effective in groundwater quality evaluation for complex aquifers. In the current study, fuzzy set theory is applied to groundwater-quality related decision-making in an agricultural production context; the Mamdani, Sugeno, and Larsen fuzzy logic-based models (MFL, SFL, and LFL, respectively) are used to develop a series of new, generalized, rule-based fuzzy models for water quality evaluation using widely accepted irrigation indices and hydrological data from the Sarab Plain, Iran. Rather than drawing upon physiochemical groundwater quality parameters, the present research employs widely accepted agricultural indices (e.g., irrigation criteria) when developing the MFL, SFL and LFL groundwater quality models. These newly-developed models, generated significantly more consistent results than the United States Soil Laboratory (USSL) diagram, addressed the inherent uncertainty in threshold data, and were effective in assessing groundwater quality for agricultural uses. The SFL model is recommended as it outperforms both MFL and LFL in terms of accuracy when assessing groundwater quality using irrigation indices.

AbstractIn this time of a changing climate, it is important to know whether lake levels will rise, potentially causing flooding, or river flows will dry up during abnormally dry weather. The Great Lakes region is the largest freshwater lake system in the world. Moreover, agriculture, industry, commerce, and shipping are active in this densely populated region. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) recently implemented the Water Cycle Prediction System (WCPS) over the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River watershed (WCPS-GLS version 1.0) following a decade of research and development. WCPS, a network of linked models, simulates the complete water cycle, following water as it moves from the atmosphere to the surface, through the river network and into lakes, and back to the atmosphere. Information concerning the water cycle is passed between the models. WCPS is the first short-to-medium-range prediction system of the complete water cycle to be run on an operational basis anywhere. It currently produces ...