Votre recherche
Résultats 3 ressources
-
Abstract Having a realistic estimation of snow cover by conceptual hydrological models continues to challenge hydrologists. The calibration of the free model parameters is an unavoidable step and the uncertainties resulting from the use of this optimal set remains a source of concern, especially in forecasting applications and climate changes impact assessments. This study seeks to improve the calibration of the conceptual hydrological model GR4J coupled with the Cemaneige snow model, in order to obtain a more realistic simulation of the snow water equivalent (SWE) and to reduce the uncertainty of the free parameters. The performance of the two models was tested over twelve snow-dominated basins in southern Quebec, Canada. Four calibration strategies were adopted and compared. In the first two strategies, the parameters were calibrated against observed streamflow alone using a local and a global algorithm. In the third and fourth strategies the calibration of snow and hydrological parameters was performed against observed streamflow and snow water equivalent (SWE) measured at snow course transects, first separately, and then with a multiobjective approach. An ensemble of equifinal parameters was used to compare the capacity of the global and multiobjective algorithms to improve the parameters identifiability and to assess the impact of parameter equifinality on the temperature sensitivity of spring peak streamflow. The large number of equifinal parameters found during calibration underscores the importance of structural non-identifiability of the coupled GR4J-Cemaneige model. The inclusion of snow observations within a multiobjective calibration improved the simulation of SWE, the identifiability of the parameters and their correlation with basins characteristics. Parameter equifinality caused a small but non negligible uncertainty in the simulated response of spring peak flow to warming temperatures. Parameter equifinality should be considered in climate impact studies in snow-dominated basins where poorly constrained snow parameters can affect the temperature sensitivity of streamflow.
-
Seasonal forecasting of spring floods in snow-covered basins is challenging due to the ambiguity in the driving processes, uncertain estimations of antecedent catchment conditions and the choice of predictor variables. In this study we attempt to improve the prediction of spring flow peaks in southern Quebec, Canada, by studying the preconditioning mechanisms of runoff generation and their impact on inter-annual variations in the timing and magnitude of spring peak flow. Historical observations and simulated data from a hydrological and snowmelt model were used to study the antecedent conditions that control flood characteristics in twelve snow-dominated catchments. Maximum snow accumulation (peak SWE), snowmelt and rainfall volume, snowmelt and rainfall intensity, and soil moisture were estimated during the pre-flood period. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify the most relevant predictors and assess their relative contribution to the interannual variability of flood characteristics. Results show that interannual variations in spring peak flow are controlled differently between basins. Overall, interannual variations in peak flow were mainly governed, in order of importance, by snowmelt intensity, rainfall intensity, snowmelt volume, rainfall volume, peak SWE, and soil moisture. Variations in the timing of peak flow were controlled in most basins by rainfall volume and rainfall and snowmelt intensity. In the northernmost, snow-dominated basins, pre-flood rainfall amount and intensity mostly controlled peak flow variability, whereas in the southern, rainier basins snowpack conditions and melt dynamics controlled this variability. Snowpack interannual variations were found to be less important than variations in rainfall in forested basins, where snowmelt is more gradual. Conversely, peak flow was more sensitive to snowpack conditions in agricultural basins where snowmelt occurs faster. These results highlight the impact of land cover and use on spring flood generation mechanism, and the limited predictability potential of spring floods using simple methods and antecedent hydrological factors.