Votre recherche

Rapid urban expansion has significantly altered land use patterns, resulting in a decrease in pervious surface areas and a disruption of hydrologic connectivity between surface water and groundwater systems. Combined with inadequate drainage systems and poorly managed runoff, these changes have intensified urban flooding, leading to fatalities and significant infrastructure damage in many rapidly growing and climate-vulnerable urban areas around the world. This study presents an integrated economic-hydrologic model to assess the effectiveness of Low Impact Development (LID) measures—specifically permeable pavement, infiltration trenches, bio-retention cells, and rain barrels—in mitigating flood damage in the Bronx river watershed, NYC. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was employed to simulate flood events and assess the effectiveness of various LIDs, applied individually and in combination, in reducing peak discharge. Flood inundation maps generated using HEC-GeoRAS were integrated with the HAZUS damage estimation model to quantify potential flood damages. A benefit-to-cost (BC) ratio was then calculated by comparing the monetary savings from reduced flood damage against the implementation costs of LID measures. Results indicate that the combined LID scenario offers the highest peak flow reduction, with permeable pavement alone reducing flow by 57%, outperforming other techniques under equal area coverage. Among all individual options, permeable pavement yields the highest cumulative BC ratio under all scenarios (4.6), whereas rain barrels are the least effective (2.6). The proposed evaluation framework highlights the importance of economic efficiency in flood mitigation planning and provides a structured foundation for informed decision-making to enhance urban resilience through LID implementation. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.

Study region: This study aims at the Kunhar River Basin, Pakistan, that has been facing repeated flood occurrences on a recurring basis. As the flood susceptibility of this area is high, its topographic complexity demands correct predictive modeling for strategic flood planning. Study focus: We developed a system of flood susceptibility mapping based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. Four kernel functions were applied, and the highest-performing was the Radial Basis Function (SVM-RBF). The model was validated and trained using historical flood inventories, morphometric parameters, and hydrologic variables, and feature dimensionality was reduced via PCA for increased efficiency. New hydrological insights: The SVM-RBF model recorded an AUC of 0.8341, 88.02% success, 84.97% predictability, 0.89 Kappa value, and F1-score of 0.86, all of which indicated high predictability. Error analysis yielded a PBIAS of +2.14%, indicating negligible overestimation bias but within limits acceptable in hydrological modeling. The results support the superiority of the SVM-RBF approach compared to conventional bivariate methods in modeling flood susceptibility over the complex terrain of mountains. The results can be applied in guiding evidence-based flood mitigation, land-use planning, and adaptive management in the Kunhar River Basin. © 2025 The Author(s)

This study presents a novel bivariate-output deep learning framework based on LeNet-5 for the simultaneous prediction of urban flood susceptibility and inundation depth in Seoul, South Korea. Unlike previous studies that relied on single-output models, the proposed approach jointly learns classification and regression targets through a shared feature extraction structure, enhancing consistency and generalization. Among six tested architectures, the Le5SD_CBAM model—integrating a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM)—achieved the best performance, with 83% accuracy, an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.91 for flood susceptibility classification, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.12 m and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.18 m for depth estimation. The model’s spatial predictions aligned well with hydrological principles and past flood records, accurately identifying low-lying flood-prone zones and capturing localized inundation patterns influenced by infrastructure and micro-topography. Importantly, it detected spatial mismatches between susceptibility and depth, demonstrating the benefit of joint modeling. Variable importance analysis highlighted elevation as the dominant predictor, while distances to roads, rivers, and drainage systems were also key contributors. In contrast, secondary terrain attributes had limited influence, indicating that urban infrastructure has significantly altered natural flood flow dynamics. Although the model lacks dynamic forcings such as rainfall and upstream inflows, it remains a valuable tool for flood risk mapping in data-scarce settings. The bivariate-output framework improves computational efficiency and internal coherence compared to separate single-task models, supporting its integration into urban flood management and planning systems. © 2025 by the authors.

Flooding is an escalating hazard in arid and rapidly urbanizing environments such as Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where the lack of historical flood records and sparse monitoring systems challenge effective risk prediction. To address this gap, this study aims to develop an accurate and interpretable flood susceptibility-mapping framework tailored to data-scarce urban settings. The research integrates a stacked ensemble model—comprising machine learning: XGBoost, CatBoost, and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB)—with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance prediction accuracy and model transparency. Random Forest was excluded from the final model stack due to inferior classification performance. A diverse set of geospatial inputs, including digital elevation model, slope, flow direction, Curve Number, topographic indices, and LULC (from ESRI Sentinel-2) were used as predictors. Furthermore, 92 and 198 flooded and non-flooded points were used for model validation. The model achieved strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.92, Accuracy = 0.82) on the validation set. In the absence of official flood records, model outputs were intersected with road network data to identify 395 road points in highly susceptible zones. Although these points do not represent a formal validation dataset—due to the general lack of detailed flood event records in the region, particularly in relation to infrastructure—they provide a valuable proxy for identifying flood-prone road segments. SHAP explainability analysis revealed that TRI, TPI, and distance to rivers were the most globally influential features, while Curve Number and LULC were key drivers of high-risk predictions. The model mapped 139 km2 (8.7 %) of the area as very high flood susceptibility and 325 km2 (20.3 %) as high susceptibility, outperforming individual learners. These results confirm that stacked ensemble learning, paired with explainable AI and creative validation strategies, can produce reliable flood susceptibility maps even in data-constrained contexts. This framework offers a transferable and scalable solution for flood risk assessment in similar arid and urbanizing environments. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Flooding remains a critical hydrological hazard in the Itang watershed within the Lower Baro-Akobo Basin, requiring an in-depth assessment of flood susceptibility. This study employs a multi-criteria evaluation method, integrating key geospatial and hydrological parameters such as topographic slope, elevation, land use/land cover, River proximity, drainage network density, precipitation intensity, and soil properties. Utilizing a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach within the ArcMap 10.3.1 environment, a flood hazard zonation map was generated, classifying the watershed into five risk categories: Very high, high, moderate, low, and very low. The findings reveal that approximately 69.69% of the watershed falls within the high to very high flood risk zones, predominantly influenced by low-lying Elevation, gentle slopes, proximity to the river, land cover dynamics, high drainage density, and precipitation variability. These insights emphasize the necessity of integrating robust flood mitigation measures, early warning mechanisms, and sustainable watershed management interventions to enhance flood resilience and reduce hydrological risks in the study watershed. © The Author(s) 2025.

Floods constitute the most significant natural hazard to societies worldwide. Population growth and unchecked development have led to floodplain encroachment. Modelling suggests that climate change will regionally intensify the threat posed by future floods, with more people in harm's way. From a global change perspective, past flood events and their spatial-temporal patterns are of particular interest because they can be linked to former climate patterns, which can be used to guide future climate predictions. Millennial and centennial time series contain evidence of very rare extreme events, which are often considered by society as ‘unprecedented’. By understanding their timing, magnitude and frequency in conjunction with prevailing climate regime, we can better forecast their future occurrence. This Virtual Special Issue (VSI) entitled Temporal and spatial patterns in Holocene floods under the influence of past global change, and their implications for forecasting “unpredecented” future events comprises 14 papers that focus on how centennial and millennia-scale natural and documentary flood archives help improve future flood science. Specifically, documentation of large and very rare flood episodes challenges society's lack of imagination regarding the scale of flood disasters that are possible (what we term here, the “unknown unknowns”). Temporal and spatial flood behaviour and related climate patterns as well as the reconstruction of flood propagation in river systems are important foci of this VSI. These reconstructions are crucial for the provision of robust and reliable data sets, knowledge and baseline information for future flood scenarios and forecasting. We argue that it remains difficult to establish analogies for understanding flood risk during the current period of global warming. Most studies in this VSI suggest that the most severe flooding occurred during relatively cool climate periods, such as the Little Ice Age. However, flood patterns have been significantly altered by land use and river management in many catchments and floodplains over the last two centuries, thereby obscuring the climate signal. When the largest floods in instrumental records are compared with paleoflood records reconstructed from natural and documentary archives, it becomes clear that precedent floods should have been considered in many cases of flood frequency analysis and flood risk modelling in hydraulic infrastructure. Finally, numerical geomorphological analysis and hydrological simulations show great potential for testing and improving our understanding of the processes and factors involved in the temporal and spatial behaviour of floods. © 2025 The Authors

Artificial flooding of rainwater is most common in urban areas due to various reasons, such as improper drainage systems, obstruction of natural drainage by building constructions, and encroachment of stormwater nallahs. Flash floods lead to significant losses, disrupt transportation, and cause inconvenience to the public. Udupi, characterized by its porous lateritic strata, undulating topography, and proximity to the sea, experiences artificial flooding during the peak monsoon season in its low-lying areas, primarily due to the overflow of the Indrani River, which is also a potential water resource for Udupi, Karnataka. Currently, the river faces significant challenges due to increasing anthropogenic activities. Revitalizing the Indrani River offers numerous benefits, including its potential use as a drinking water source during periods of water scarcity. This study aims to propose flood and stormwater management measures for the river catchment and to evaluate selected water quality parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity) at fifteen strategic locations along the river course. Higher conductivity observed at downstream stations is attributed to sewage discharge from urban settlements and a sewage treatment plant. The study suggests short-term measures such as targeted clean-up operations and stricter enforcement of pollution control regulations. Additionally, it recommends long-term strategies, including the development of a comprehensive river basin management plan, community engagement initiatives, and improvements to wastewater treatment infrastructure. To maintain the health of the Indrani River, this research emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and the implementation of integrated management practices. © The Author(s) 2025.

Flooding is the most frequent natural disaster in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB), causing significant socio-economic damages. In recent decades, abundant wetland resources in the YRB have experienced substantial changes and played a significant role in strengthening the hydrological resilience to flood risks. However, wetland-related approaches remain underdeveloped for mitigating flood risks in the YRB due to the lack of considering long-term wetland effects in the flood risk assessment. Therefore, this study develops an wetland-related GIS-based spatial multi-index flood risk assessment model by incorporating the effects of wetland variations, to investigate the long-term implications of wetland variations on flood risks, to identify dominant flood risk indicators under wetland effects, and to provide wetland-related flood risk management suggestions. These findings indicate that wetlands in the Taihu Lake Basin, Wanjiang Plain, Poyang Lake Basin, and Dongting and Honghu Lake Basin could enhance flood control capacity and reduce flood risks in most years between 1985 and 2021 except years with extreme flood disasters. Wetlands in the Sichuan Basin have aggravated but limited impacts on flood risks. Precipitation in the Taihu Lake Basin and Poyang Lake Basin, runoff and vegetation cover in the Wanjiang Plain, GDP in the Taihu Lake Basin, population density in the Taihu lake Basin, Dongting and Honghu Lake Basin, and the Sichuan Basin are dominant flood risk indicators under wetland effects. Reasonably managing wetlands, maximizing stormwater storage capacity, increasing vegetation coverage in urbanized and precipitated regions are feasible suggestions for developing wetland-related flood resilience strategies in the YRB. © 2025 The Authors

Urban flood disasters pose substantial threats to public safety and urban development, with climate change exacerbating the intensity, frequency, and consequences of such events. While existing research has predominantly concentrated on flood control and disaster response, limited attention has been paid to the underlying drivers and evolutionary mechanisms of urban flood resilience. This study applies the resilience framework to develop an integrated methodology for assessing urban flood resilience. Focusing on three coastal provinces in China that frequently experience severe flooding, the study identifies fifteen key resilience drivers to construct a compound driver system. The evolution of flood resilience is examined through the lens of the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model, which categorizes the drivers into three distinct dimensions. The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretative Structural Model (ISM) methods are employed to analyze the interrelationships and hierarchical structure among drivers. In parallel, a system dynamics (SD) modeling approach is used to construct causal-loop and stock-flow diagrams, revealing the complex interdependencies and critical pathways across resilience dimensions. The analysis identifies rainfall intensity as the most influential driver in shaping urban flood resilience. Scenario simulations based on the SD model explore variations in resilience performance under three developmental pathways. Findings suggest that enhancing response resilience is crucial under current flood control trajectories. This study contributes novel conceptual and methodological insights into the measurement and evolution of urban flood resilience. It offers actionable guidance for policymakers aiming to strengthen flood risk governance and urban safety. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme floods in the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB). This study leverages the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to evaluate its performance in predicting river discharge across the LMB and to identify the key variables contributing to flood prediction through SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) and Universal Multifractal (UM) analyses, in a scale-dependent and scale-independent manner, respectively. The performance of the LSTM model is satisfactory, with Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values exceeding 0.9 for all subbasins when using all input features. The model tends to underestimate the largest peak flows in the midstream subbasins that experienced extreme rainfall events. According to SHAP, soil-related variables are important contributors to discharge prediction, with their impacts partially manifested through interactions with precipitation and runoff. Furthermore, the dominant contributing variables influencing flood prediction vary over time: soil-related variables and vegetation-related variables played a more significant role in earlier years, whereas hydrometeorological variables became more dominant after 2017. The UM analysis investigates the scaling behaviours of contributing variables, showing that hydrometeorological-related variables have a greater influence on predicting extreme discharge across the small temporal scales. Additionally, the UM analysis indicates that the model's performance improves as the temporal variability in extremes of the combined features decreases across 1 to 16 days. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the LSTM model's performance in discharge prediction, emphasising the impact of the variability in the extremes of combined features through the scale-independent interpretation. These findings will offer valuable insights for stakeholders to improve flood risk management across the LMB. © 2025 The Authors

This review examines the role of vegetation as a nature-based solution (NBS) for sustainable river corridor management, integrating a wide range of interdisciplinary domains. It synthesizes studies addressing global challenges in river systems, the worldwide adoption of vegetation-based solutions and location-specific field observations from major Indian rivers such as the Brahmaputra and Ganga. This paper also reviews flume-scale experiments on vegetation–flow interactions and explores the biomechanical properties of vegetation, such as root reinforcement that contribute to riverbank stability. In addition, it discusses the selection of suitable species based on specific climatic regions, as reported in the literature. Building on this interdisciplinary understanding, this review highlights the vital role of vegetation in mitigating bank erosion, regulating sediment transport, attenuating floods and enhancing the overall health and resilience of riverine ecosystems and communities. It proposes an integrated framework that combines vegetation with biodegradable materials such as bamboo fencing and geo-bags and conventional engineering measures to address high-flow conditions and ensure long-term riverbank stability. Additionally, a flume-scale physical model study was conducted to investigate near-bank hydrodynamics in the presence of a series of three spurs and a combination of rigid and flexible vegetation. The results indicate that vegetation significantly reduces streamwise velocity near the bank, achieving performance comparable to that of the spur arrangement. This study identifies key challenges, including appropriate species selection, long-term maintenance of vegetation-based solutions and the need for adaptive management strategies. It further emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement for successful and sustainable implementation. © 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The efficient and rational development of hydropower in the Lancang–Mekong River Basin can promote green energy transition, reduce carbon emissions, prevent and mitigate flood and drought disasters, and ensure the sustainable development of the entire basin. In this study, based on publicly available hydrometeorological observation data and satellite remote sensing monitoring data from 2001 to 2020, a machine learning model of the Lancang–Mekong Basin was developed to reconstruct the basin’s hydrological processes, and identify the occurrence patterns and influencing mechanisms of water-related hazards. The results show that, against the background of climate change, the Lancang–Mekong Basin is affected by the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events. In particular, Rx1day, Rx5day, R10mm, and R95p (extreme precipitation indicators determined by the World Meteorological Organization’s Expert Group on Climate Change Monitoring and Extreme Climate Events) in the northwestern part of the Mekong River Basin show upward trends, with the average maximum daily rainfall increasing by 1.8 mm/year and the total extreme precipitation increasing by 18 mm/year on average. The risks of flood and drought disasters will continue to rise. The flood peak period is mainly concentrated in August and September, with the annual maximum flood peak ranging from 5600 to 8500 m3/s. The Stung Treng Station exhibits longer drought duration, greater severity, and higher peak intensity than the Chiang Saen and Pakse Stations. At the Pakse Station, climate change and hydropower development have altered the non-drought proportion by −12.50% and +15.90%, respectively. For the Chiang Saen Station, the fragmentation degree of the drought index time series under the baseline, naturalized, and hydropower development scenarios is 0.901, 1.16, and 0.775, respectively. These results indicate that hydropower development has effectively reduced the frequency of rapid drought–flood transitions within the basin, thereby alleviating pressure on drought management efforts. The regulatory role of the cascade reservoirs in the Lancang River can mitigate risks posed by climate change, weaken adverse effects, reduce flood peak flows, alleviate hydrological droughts in the dry season, and decrease flash drought–flood transitions in the basin. The research findings can enable basin managers to proactively address climate change, develop science-based technical pathways for hydropower dispatch, and formulate adaptive disaster prevention and mitigation strategies. © 2025 by the authors.

ABSTRACT Natural flood management strategies (NFMs) encompass a variety of measures implemented across catchments to mitigate flood risks while providing multiple benefits. In recent years, NFMs have gained increasing attention from researchers and policymakers. However, despite the growing body of research, there remains a lack of a critical review that quantitatively synthesises the reported performance of different NFMs by analysing their effects on key hydrological parameters. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of NFMs based on 145 peer‐reviewed papers covering 216 case studies across 37 countries, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our analysis moves from a descriptive overview of the evidence base to a novel, quantitative investigation of three critical themes: the characteristics of studied NFM schemes, the methodologies used for their assessment, and their quantitative hydrological performance and its influencing factors. Results indicate that 31% of the studies identified flood peak reduction as the most commonly targeted hydrological objective. A significant positive correlation was found between intervention diversity and intensity (Spearman's ρ  = 0.53). Furthermore, our methodological analysis reveals a critical trade‐off in the literature, with empirical monitoring typically used in small catchments over shorter durations, while modelling is used to assess a greater diversity of interventions at larger scales, with truly combined approaches being notably rare (11%). Notably, river and floodplain management (RFM) demonstrated higher effectiveness, achieving an average flood peak reduction of 30%, particularly in larger catchments. Bearing the often multi‐faceted aims of NFMs in mind, this paper provides key suggestions for future research.

The flood disasters are prevalent in the Ganga–Brahmaputra (GB) basin with recurrent occurrences and severe impacts across the major watersheds. The present study analyses the vulnerability of 44 watersheds to flood inundation and its impact on cropland, urban areas, and population. The Sentinel-1 dataset was utilised to analyse flood extent and frequency from 2015 to 2022, enabling the identification of flood-prone watersheds in the Ganga–Brahmaputra basin. The analysis revealed that 7 watersheds in the Ganga basin and 12 watersheds in the Brahmaputra basin are particularly vulnerable to flooding. The flood hazard analysis was performed using fuzzy-AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), focusing on six parameters, including topographic wetness index (TWI), elevation, precipitation, drainage density, distance from river, and NDVI for the selected 19 watersheds. The inundation analysis from 2015 to 2022 revealed that the maximum flood extent was observed in 2020, with an affected area of 33,537.6 km2 and 34,937.9 km2 in the Ganga–Brahmaputra basin, respectively. The flood hazard analysis identified Upper Ganga (8877.52 km2), Ghaghara (18573.9 km2) and Teesta (1543.06 km2) as having the highest proportion of their geographical area under very high-hazard zone and the highest percentage in the very low hazard zones were observed in Jamuneshwary (1093.55 km2), Atreyee (4410.42 km2), and Kulsi (1273.89 km2). By first mapping these watersheds with precision and then using various parameters for flood hazard analysis, it ensures accurate identification of flood-prone areas, offering valuable insights for flood management and mitigation in a critical region. © Indian Academy of Sciences 2025.

Flooding is a persistent hazard in tropical regions of India, primarily driven by intense precipitation and further aggravated by anthropogenic activities. Despite ongoing efforts, a gap persists in the development of comprehensive risk models that integrate hazard, vulnerability, and exposure components at a watershed level. This research seeks to bridge that gap by implementing a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), to generate a risk map for the tropical Meenachil River Basin (MRB), originating in the Western Ghats, southwest India. Nine conditioning factors (CFs) were evaluated to assess hazard, and the resulting hazard layer was integrated with vulnerability data and different exposure factors (EFs), such as built-up height, built-up surface, built-up volume, population, and total exposure, to produce a risk map. Validation of the hazard model utilizing the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve achieved an excellent Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.825, along with high accuracy (0.818), F1-score (0.802), precision (0.812), and recall (0.793). Approximately 11% of the MRB lies in a very high hazard zone and 1.51% in a very high risk zone. These results advocate for sustainable flood management by identifying key risk zones, thereby facilitating the implementation of focused site-specific mitigation strategies. © The Author(s) 2025.

Flood risk assessment (FRA) is a process of evaluating potential flood damage by considering vulnerability of exposed elements and consequences of flood events through risk analysis which recommends the mitigation measures to reduce the impact of floods. This flood risk analysis is a technique used to identify and rank the level of flood risk through modeling and spatial analysis. In the present study, Musi River in the Osmansagar basin is taken in to consideration to evaluate the flood risk, which is located at Hyderabad. The input data collected for the study encompasses Hydrological and Meteorological datasets from Gandipet Guage station in Hyderabad, raster grid data for Osmansagar basin along with several indicators data influencing flood vulnerability. The primary research objective is to conduct a quantitative assessment of the Flood vulnerability index (FVI), to develop a comprehensive flood risk map and to evaluate the magnitude of damaging flood parameters, inundated volume and to analyze the regions inundated in the study area. In risk analysis, FVI determines the degree of which an area is susceptible to the negative impact of flood through various influencing indicators, Flood hazard map segregate the regions based on flood risk level through spatial analysis in Arc-GIS. A part of this study includes an integrated methodology for assessing flood inundation using Quantum Geographic Information Systems (QGIS) data modelling for spatial analysis, Hydraulic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) hydraulic modelling for unsteady flow analysis and a machine learning technique i.e. XGBoost, to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of flood risk assessment. Subsequently, inundation map produced using HEC-RAS is superimposed with building footprints to identify vulnerable structures. The results obtained by risk analysis using hydraulic modeling, GIS analysis, and machine learning technique illustrates the flood vulnerability, areas having high flood risk and inundated volume along with predicted flood levels for next 10 years. These findings demonstrate the efficiency of the holistic approach in identifying vulnerability, flood-prone areas and evaluating potential impacts on infrastructure and communities. The outcomes of the study assist the decision-makers to gain valuable insights into flood risk management strategies. © The Author(s) 2025.

Extreme weather events (EWEs), including floods, droughts, heatwaves and storms, are increasingly recognised as major drivers of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. In this systematic review, we synthesise 251 studies documenting the impacts of extreme weather events on freshwater, terrestrial and marine ecosystems, with the goal of informing effective conservation and management strategies for areas of special conservation or protection focus in Ireland.Twenty-two of the reviewed studies included Irish ecosystems. In freshwater systems, flooding (34 studies) was the most studied EWE, often linked to declines in species richness, abundance and ecosystem function. In terrestrial ecosystems, studies predominantly addressed droughts (60 studies) and extreme temperatures (48 studies), with impacts including increase in mortality, decline in growth and shift in species composition. Marine and coastal studies focused largely on storm events (33 studies), highlighting physical damages linked to wave actions, behavioural changes in macrofauna, changes in species composition and distribution, and loss in habitat cover. Results indicate that most EWEs lead to negative ecological responses, although responses are context specific.While positive responses to EWEs are rare, species with adaptive traits displayed some resilience, especially in ecosystems with high biodiversity or refuge areas.These findings underscore the need for conservation strategies that incorporate EWE projections, particularly for protected habitats and species. © 2025 Royal Irish Academy. All rights reserved.

Les événements météorologiques extrêmes (EME) et les désastres qu’ils entrainent provoquent des conséquences psychosociales qui sont modulées en fonction de différents facteurs sociaux. On constate aussi que les récits médiatiques et culturels qui circulent au sujet des EME ne sont pas représentatifs de l’ensemble des expériences de personnes sinistrées : celles qui en subissent les conséquences les plus sévères tendent aussi à être celles qu’on « entend » le moins dans l’espace public. Ces personnes sont ainsi susceptibles de vivre de l’injustice épistémique, ce qui a des effets délétères sur le soutien qu’elles reçoivent. Face à ces constats s’impose la nécessité de mieux comprendre la diversité des expériences d’EME et d’explorer des stratégies pour soutenir l’ensemble des personnes sinistrées dans leur rétablissement psychosocial. Cet article soutient que la recherche narrative peut contribuer à répondre à ces objectifs. En dépeignant des réalités multiples, la recherche narrative centrée sur les récits de personnes sinistrées présente aussi un intérêt significatif pour l’amélioration des pratiques d’intervention en contexte de désastre. , Extreme weather events (EWE) and their resulting disasters cause psychosocial consequences that are moderated by different social factors. Media and cultural accounts of EWEs do not represent the full range of disaster survivor experiences, that is, those who experienced the most severe consequences also tend to be those least “heard” in the public arena. These people are therefore most likely to experience forms of epistemic injustice that negatively impact the support offered to cope with disaster. Considering these findings, there is a need to better understand the diversity of EWE experiences and explore strategies for supporting all disaster survivors in their psychosocial recovery. This article argues that narrative research can help meet these needs. By portraying the multiple realities of people affected by EWEs, narrative research focusing on the stories of disaster survivors is also of significant interest for improving intervention practices in this context.

AbstractThe frequency and severity of floods has increased in different regions of the world due to climate change. Although the impact of floods on human health has been extensively studied, the increase in the segments of the population that are likely to be impacted by floods in the future makes it necessary to examine how adaptation measures impact the mental health of individuals affected by these natural disasters. The goal of this scoping review is to document the existing studies on flood adaptation measures and their impact on the mental health of affected populations, in order to identify the best preventive strategies as well as limitations that deserve further exploration. This study employed the methodology of the PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews to systematically search the databases Medline and Web of Science to identify studies that examined the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of flood victims. The database queries resulted in a total of 857 records from both databases. Following two rounds of screening, 9 studies were included for full-text analysis. Most of the analyzed studies sought to identify the factors that drive resilience in flood victims, particularly in the context of social capital (6 studies), whereas the remaining studies analyzed the impact of external interventions on the mental health of flood victims, either from preventive or post-disaster measures (3 studies). There is a very limited number of studies that analyze the impact of adaptation measures on the mental health of populations and individuals affected by floods, which complicates the generalizability of their findings. There is a need for public health policies and guidelines for the development of flood adaptation measures that adequately consider a social component that can be used to support the mental health of flood victims.