Votre recherche

Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer‐reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood‐risk perception and flood‐risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.

Purpose Driven by the New Urban Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals, decision makers have been striving to reorientate policy debates towards the aspiration of achieving urban resilience and monitoring the effectiveness of adaptive measures through the implementation of standardised indicators. Consequently, there has been a rise of indicator systems measuring resilience. This paper aims to argue that the ambition of making cities resilient does not always make them less vulnerable, more habitable, equitable and just. Design/methodology/approach Using an inductive policy analysis of ISO standard 37123:2019 “Sustainable cities and communities — Indicators for resilient cities”, the authors examine the extent to which the root causes of risks are being addressed by the urban resilience agenda. Findings The authors show that the current standardisation of resilience fails to adequately address the political dimension of disaster risk reduction, reducing resilience to a management tool and missing the opportunity to address the socio-political sources of risks. Originality/value Such critical analysis of the Standard is important as it moves away from a hazard-centric approach and, instead, permits to shed light on the socio-political processes of risk creation and to adopt a more nuanced and sensitive understanding of urban characteristics and governance mechanisms.

Au Québec, chaque année, les inondations printanières présentent un défi majeur pour les autorités québécoises. Ainsi, l'élaboration de nouveaux outils et de nouvelles méthodes pour diffuser et visualiser des données massives spatiotemporelles 3D dynamiques d'inondation est très important afin de mieux comprendre et gérer les risques reliés aux inondations. Cette recherche s'intéresse à la diffusion de données géospatiales massives 3D (modèles de bâtiments 3D, arbres, modèles numériques d'élévation de terrain (MNE), données LiDAR, imageries aériennes, etc.) en relation avec les inondations. Le problème est qu'il n'existe pas, à travers la littérature, des systèmes de diffusion efficaces des données massives 3D adaptées aux besoins de cette recherche. En ce sens, notre objectif général consiste à développer un outil de diffusion des données géospatiales massives 3D qui sont des bâtiments 3D et des modèles de terrains de haute résolution à l'échelle de la province du Québec. Les défis de diffusion du flux de données massives, nous ramènent à considérer la technique de tuilage 3D pour convertir les données brutes en formats et structures vectoriels plus légers et adaptés à la diffusion comme la spécification "3D Tiles" pour tuiler les bâtiments 3D, les nuages de points LiDAR et d'autres modèles géoréférencés 3D et le maillage irrégulier, notamment les TIN, pour tuiler les modèles numériques de terrain. Aussi, l'utilisation des techniques de traitement parallèle permet de gérer efficacement les flux massifs de données et d'améliorer le temps de traitement permettant ainsi la scalabilité et la flexibilité des systèmes existants. A cet effet, deux pipelines de tuilage ont été développés. Le premier pipeline concerne la création des tuiles de bâtiments 3D selon la spécification "3D Tiles". Le deuxième est pour créer des tuiles de terrain basées sur des maillages irréguliers. Ces pipelines sont ensuite intégrés dans un système de traitement distribué basé sur des conteneurs Docker afin de paralléliser les processus de traitements. Afin de tester l'efficacité et la validité du système développé, nous avons testé ce système sur un jeux de données massif d'environ 2.5 millions bâtiments 3D situés au Québec. Ces expérimentations ont permis de valider et de mesurer l'efficacité du système proposé par rapport à sa capacité de se mettre à l'échelle (Scalabilité) pour prendre en charge, efficacement, les flux massifs de données 3D. Ces expérimentations ont aussi permis de mettre en place des démarches d'optimisation permettant une meilleure performance dans la production et la diffusion des tuiles 3D.

Les politiques québécoises de prévention des risques liés aux inondations ont été sujettes à débat ces dernières années, avec une remise en cause du modèle centralisé et uniforme à travers le Québec, pour une approche plus intégrée. Celle-ci fait notamment la promotion de mesures axées sur la vulnérabilité et d’une participation plus active des acteurs territoriaux. On en sait toutefois très peu sur les déclinaisons locales de l’approche intégrée dans le contexte québécois. Ce mémoire propose d’interroger les différentes approches locales de la prévention et de soulever les enjeux qu’elles posent du point de vue des autorités qui y participent. L’étude se penche sur le cas des territoires concernés par les inondations du lac des Deux Montagnes (Région hydrographique de l'Outaouais et de Montréal). Le cadre d’analyse met de l’avant l’approche des instruments d’action publique pour comprendre leur appropriation par les acteurs locaux et une approche pragmatique qui consiste à centrer notre regard sur les pratiques et les stratégies de réduction des risques d’inondation. La recherche s’appuie sur trois sources de données : une analyse documentaire des régimes provinciaux de régulation des risques d’inondation, un recensement des pratiques de prévention déployées par les autorités locales concernées par les inondations du lac des Deux Montagnes et une série de 15 entretiens réalisés avec les personnes travaillant au sein de ces différentes autorités. Le cas illustre la difficulté et le faible engagement de prévenir les risques autrement que par l’approche de réduction de l’exposition aux risques imposée par la Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables (PPRLPI). Toutefois, après les inondations de 2017 et de 2019, des approches alternatives propres aux contextes territoriaux ont été envisagées par différentes organisations. Celles-ci devraient davantage être documentées et mises en débat afin d’envisager un régime provincial de la gestion des risques plus flexible et ouvert à leur coexistence. <br /><br /> Uniformed and centralized model of Quebec's flood prevention policies have been recently debated. Integrated approach to flood risk prevention is now put forward, which focus more on vulnerability and foster an active participation of local authorities. Local declinations of the approach are relatively unknown in Quebec. This study presents different local approaches to flood risk prevention and raise issues they pose from the perspective of local authorities involved. It is based on the authority’s concerns by Lac des Deux Montagnes flooding (Outaouais and Montreal hydrographic region). Combining a political sociology approach to policy instruments and a pragmatic approach, we focus on risk regulation regimes, practices and risk reduction strategies. Three sources of data were used: an analysis of flood risk regulation regimes, an inventory of prevention practices deployed by local authorities and 15 interviews conducted with professionals among these authorities. Results show the difficulty and low commitment to implement local distinct approaches apart from prohibiting and discouraging exposure to flood risk enforced by the Protection Policy for Lakeshores, Riverbanks, Littoral Zones and Floodplains. However, after the floods of 2017 and 2019, alternative strategies specific to different territorial contexts were considered. These should be better documented and debated in order to consider a more flexible and coexistence provincial policy.

Abstract The analysis across spatial, temporal and governance scales shows an inequitable distribution of risk across Canada’s Metro Vancouver region. For First Nation communities in this region, this risk is rooted in the colonial history of land dispossession. This article makes a contribution by expanding our understanding of historic creation of riskscapes and a discussion of its implications as a multiscale governance issue that persists across space and time. This article also situates the impacts of projected sea level rise on Indigenous communities in the context of regional, provincial and federal settler-colonial flood risk management regime.

Flood risk management requires to comprehensively assess how policy strategies may affect individuals and communities. However, policy development and implementation often downplay or even increase social inequality. Analysis of the social and societal implications of strategies and implementation projects to manage flood hazards is still in its infancy. To close this gap, this chapter critically questions the roles of social justice and their political implications for flood risk management with regard to resilience. The chapter discusses and argues how different theoretical concepts as well as different perspectives on justice (e.g. social, environmental and climate justice) and resilience in flood risk management are related. There is a strong need to have a broader and more in-depth discussion about the role of justice in the current resilience debate. Finally, the chapter presents the outline of a future research agenda.

Government employees, municipal officials, and communities in South Africa have grappled with post-apartheid environmental challenges, such as floods, droughts, severe storms, and wildfires. These disasters are a result of both natural and human activities. The government implemented different policies and strategies after 1994 to address these issues. While acknowledging some success in managing these disasters with the current adaptive measures, the frequency and intensity of disasters have increased, causing significant damage to life and property, particularly among the vulnerable population. This paper uses qualitative and quantitative data collection approaches to explore possible systematic and structural weaknesses in addressing post-disaster situations in South Africa. Floods appear to be the most frequent natural disaster in South Africa. The paper uncovered the fact that disaster management is a multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary field. Although various institutional arrangements exist, they do not seem appropriate for assisting vulnerable groups. While officials have made some progress in implementing post-disaster projects, challenges still hinder sustainability. Furthermore, regrettably, despite the level of success in addressing disasters, most measures have failed to achieve the intended results for a variety of reasons. The consolidated long-term measures suggested by the participants yielded a proposed ‘South African Floods Post-Disaster Checklist or Model’, which was non-existent in South Africa. By implementing more effective and efficient post-disaster measures, the proposed tool can help policymakers and strategic partners standardise post-disaster resilience and adaptive capacity in various sectors’ sustainability contexts.

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.Tropical cyclones (TCs) have devastating impacts and are responsible for significant damage. Consequently, for TC-induced direct economic loss (DEL) attribution all factors associated with risk (i.e. hazard, exposure and vulnerability) must be examined. This research quantifies the relationship between TC-induced DELs and maximum wind speed, asset value and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita using a regression model with TC records from 2000 to 2015 for China's mainland area. The coefficient of the maximum wind speed term indicates that a doubling of the maximum wind speed increases DELs by 225% [97%, 435%] when the other two variables are held constant. The coefficient of the asset value term indicates that a doubling of asset value exposed to TCs increases DELs by 79% [58%, 103%]; thus, if hazard and vulnerability are assumed to be constant in the future, then a dramatic escalation in TC-induced DELs will occur given the increase in asset value, suggesting that TC-prone areas with rapid urbanization and wealth accumulation will inevitably be subject to higher risk. Reducing the asset value exposure via land-use planning, for example, is important for decreasing TC risk. The coefficient of GDP per capita term indicates that a doubling in GDP per capita could decrease DELs by 54% [39%, 66%]. Because accumulated assets constantly increase people's demand for improved security, stakeholders must invest in risk identification, early warning systems, emergency management and other effective prevention measures with increasing income to reduce vulnerability. This research aims to quantitatively connect TC risk (expected DELs, specifically) to physical and socioeconomic drivers and emphasizes how human dimensions could contribute to TC risk. Moreover, the model can be used to estimate TC risk under climate change and future socioeconomic development in the context of China.

Abstract Watershed resilience is the ability of a watershed to maintain its characteristic system state while concurrently resisting, adapting to, and reorganizing after hydrological (for example, drought, flooding) or biogeochemical (for example, excessive nutrient) disturbances. Vulnerable waters include non-floodplain wetlands and headwater streams, abundant watershed components representing the most distal extent of the freshwater aquatic network. Vulnerable waters are hydrologically dynamic and biogeochemically reactive aquatic systems, storing, processing, and releasing water and entrained (that is, dissolved and particulate) materials along expanding and contracting aquatic networks. The hydrological and biogeochemical functions emerging from these processes affect the magnitude, frequency, timing, duration, storage, and rate of change of material and energy fluxes among watershed components and to downstream waters, thereby maintaining watershed states and imparting watershed resilience. We present here a conceptual framework for understanding how vulnerable waters confer watershed resilience. We demonstrate how individual and cumulative vulnerable-water modifications (for example, reduced extent, altered connectivity) affect watershed-scale hydrological and biogeochemical disturbance response and recovery, which decreases watershed resilience and can trigger transitions across thresholds to alternative watershed states (for example, states conducive to increased flood frequency or nutrient concentrations). We subsequently describe how resilient watersheds require spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability in hydrological and biogeochemical interactions between terrestrial systems and down-gradient waters, which necessitates attention to the conservation and restoration of vulnerable waters and their downstream connectivity gradients. To conclude, we provide actionable principles for resilient watersheds and articulate research needs to further watershed resilience science and vulnerable-water management.

Canada’s vast regions are reacting to climate change in uncertain ways. Understanding of local disaster risks and knowledge of underlying causes for negative impacts of disasters are critical factors to working toward a resilient environment across the social, economic, and the built sectors. Historically, floods have caused more economical and social damage around the world than other types of natural hazards. Since the 1900s, the most frequent hazards in Canada have been floods, wildfire, drought, and extreme cold, in terms of economic damage. The recent flood events in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, New Brunswick, Quebec, Alberta, and Manitoba have raised compelling concerns. These include should communities be educated with useful knowledge on hazard risk and resilience so they would be interested in the discussion on the vital role they can play in building resilience in their communities. Increasing awareness that perceived risk can be very different from the real threat is the motivation behind this study. The main objectives of this study include identifying and quantifying the gap between people’s perception of exposure and susceptibility to the risk and a lack of coping capacity and objective assessment of risk and resilience, as well as estimating an integrated measure of disaster resilience in a community. The proposed method has been applied to floods as an example, using actual data on the geomorphology of the study area, including terrain and low lying regions. It is hoped that the study will encourage a broader debate if a unified strategy for disaster resilience would be feasible and beneficial in Canada.

Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen im Hochwassermanagement verwenden zur Beurteilung von Schutzkonzepten meist den physischen Schaden als Hauptkriterium. Dies kann zu einer ungleichen raumlichen Entwicklung fuhren, da in strukturschwachen Gemeinden meist weit geringere monetare Werte gefahrdet sind als in verdichteten Siedlungszentren. Der folgende Beitrag zeigt den Zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Gerechtigkeit und Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und schlagt vor, wie strukturschwache Gemeinden besser in einem neuen Konzept der Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse abgebildet werden konnten, indem im Entscheidungsprozess soziale und psychologische Merkmale der Betroffenen mitberucksichtigt werden. Diese Erweiterung fuhrt dazu, dass insbesondere Gemeinden in strukturschwachen Gebieten die Moglichkeit haben, einen Hochwasserschutz rascher umzusetzen. Mit diesem Beitrag mochten wir nicht nur die Bedeutung der sozialen und psychologischen Indikatoren im Hochwassermanagement aufzeigen, sondern auch, wie der Entscheidungsprozess in Zukunft gerechter gestaltet werden kann.

La notion d’acceptabilité sociale est devenue incontournable dans plusieurs secteurs de l’action publique. Au coeur des grands projets d’aménagement et d’urbanisme, énergétiques, d’extraction des ressources, ou qui concernent l’environnement en général, cette nouvelle norme publique apparaît comme un traceur de changements importants en matière de décision tant sur le plan substantif que processuel. Comment comprendre cette notion ? Comment l’étudier et quelle trajectoire a-t-elle connu au Québec ? Dans cet article nous proposons dans un premier temps un cadre théorique pour étudier cet objet : l’approche par les instruments d’action publique, en la considérant comme un instrument de type normatif visant à favoriser la coordination, la coopération et la prévisibilité dans un environnement complexe, par la recherche d’un ajustement négocié sur des bases scientifiques et politiques. Nous présentons ensuite les principales composantes pour bien définir l’acceptabilité sociale. Enfin nous proposons d’étudier la trajectoire de cette norme sur plus de 40 ans au Québec à travers l’étude des rapports du Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement, le Chantier sur l’acceptabilité sociale (2014-2015) et deux jugements des tribunaux (Cour supérieure du Québec en 2017 et Cour d’appel du Québec en 2020). Nous constatons une montée en importance de l’acceptabilité sociale au cours des décennies, pour devenir le critère ultime de décision en plus de s’institutionnaliser jusqu’à être confirmée dans sa portée juridique et pouvant apparaître comme le chaînon manquant entre démocratie participative et démocratie représentative. , The notion of social acceptability has become unavoidable in many areas of public policy. At the heart of major planning and urban planning projects, energy, resource extraction, or the environment in general, this new public standard appears to be a tracer of significant decision-making changes, both substantive and procedural. How is this notion understood? How can it be studied and what was its trajectory in Quebec? We first propose a theoretical framework for studying this object, that is, the approach by public policy instruments as a normative instrument aimed at promoting coordination, cooperation, and predictability in a complex environment, through the search for a negotiated adjustment based on scientific and political grounds. We then present the main components for a definition of social acceptability. Finally, we propose to study the trajectory of this standard over more than forty years in Quebec through the study of the reports of the Office of Public Hearings on the Environment, the governmental workshop on social acceptability (2014-2015), and two court judgments (2017 and 2020). We found an increase in importance of social acceptability over the decades, to the point of becoming the ultimate criterion of decision and institutionalizing, and being confirmed in its legal scope; it may appear to be the missing link between participatory democracy and representative democracy.

Abstract In a rapidly changing world, what is today an unprecedented extreme may soon become the norm. As a result, extreme‐related disasters are expected to become more frequent and intense. This will have widespread socio‐economic consequences and affect the ability of different societal groups to recover from and adapt to rapidly changing environmental conditions. Therefore, there is the need to decipher the relation between genesis of unprecedented events, accumulation and distribution of risk, and recovery trajectories across different societal groups. Here, we develop an analytical approach to unravel the complexity of future extremes and multiscalar societal responses—from households to national governments and from immediate impacts to longer term recovery. This requires creating new forms of knowledge that integrate analyses of the past—that is, structural causes and political processes of risk accumulation and differentiated recovery trajectories—with plausible scenarios of future environmental extremes grounded in the event‐specific literature. We specifically seek to combine the physical characteristics of the extremes with examinations of how culture, politics, power, and policy visions shape societal responses to unprecedented events, and interpret the events as social‐environmental extremes. This new approach, at the nexus between social and natural sciences, has the concrete advantage of providing an impact‐focused vision of future social‐environmental risks, beyond what is achievable within conventional disciplinary boundaries. In this paper, we focus on extreme flooding events and the societal responses they elicit. However, our approach is flexible and applicable to a wide range of extreme events. We see it as the first building block of a new field of research, allowing for novel and integrated theoretical explanations and forecasting of social‐environmental extremes. , Key Points We conceptualize unprecedented extremes as social‐environmental processes shaped by institutional, political, and economic change As social‐environmental extremes become more frequent, there is an urgency to unravel their genesis and the possible societal responses This approach is the first building block of a new field of research in social‐environmental extreme event forecasts , Plain Language Summary The world is seeing increases in a range of extreme events, and this increase may continue or even accelerate in the future, due to anthropogenic climate change. Furthermore, it is often those who are already vulnerable that experience the biggest impacts from these extremes. Yet, there is little understanding of the possible societal responses to unprecedented events. This underscores the urgency of creating innovative approaches to develop plausible scenarios of societal responses and, in turn, mitigate hazards and reduce vulnerability and exposure to extreme events. In this commentary, we develop a truly interdisciplinary conceptual approach to better understand how different societal groups might interact with and respond to future unprecedented extreme events. We combine social science theories describing how different societal groups are affected by, and recover from, extreme events with projections from the literature identifying plausible areas at risk of unprecedented occurrences and local analyses of past extreme events. We see this as the first building block of a new field of research in forecasting social‐environmental extremes that could support governments, civil protection agencies, and civil society organizations to ensure a fairer, improved response to future events.

Flood resilience (resilient flood risk management), which has been repeatedly demanded, can be achieved through the phases of the risk management cycle. There is a vast body of literature on adaptation, disaster risk reduction measures, and effectiveness of prevention, seen through the lens of postdisaster recovery, but oftentimes the existing literature seems to underestimate the impact of financial flood recovery schemes on resilient recovery of individual households in particular. This contribution focuses on how financial schemes for flood damage compensations—their sources, design, and timing—shape the resilience of recovery of individual households. It discusses the dilemma of recovery of whether recovery schemes should be used strategically to increase resilience, or rather serve early restoration needs, equality access issues, and so on. This contribution seeks to unify the current fragmented academic debate on household resilient recovery by focusing on the ambiguous role of financial recovery schemes. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Water Human Water > Value of Water.

During the last several decades, numerous researchers have provided evidence that physical and biogeochemical processes at air-snow/ice-water interfaces are very complex, and, in many cases, interlinked. , During the last several decades, numerous researchers have provided evidence that physical and biogeochemical processes at air-snow/ice-water interfaces are very complex, and, in many cases, interlinked. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge regarding snow-borne particles. It integrates snow science from different angles: from the formation of snow and precipitation to transformations through natural and anthropogenic processes and impacts and snow management in urban areas sites. We discuss the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of particles in snow, such as their composition, abundance, size distribution, ice nucleation properties, genomic features, and microphysical processes, in urban settings, remote areas of the Arctic, and remote industrial regions (oil sands). We explore physicochemical processes of snow particles: from microbial to emerging contaminants, like nano/microplastics, light-absorbing carbonaceous organics, halogenated and nanometals particles. We review the possible contributions of snow particles to atmospheric radiation and climate, biogeochemistry, human health, and urban snow management. We propose further research directions to improve understanding of air-snow feedback, and sustainable snow management in urban areas, in the age of emerging contaminants in a changing climate.

Abstract The exposure of urban populations to flooding is highly heterogeneous, with the negative impacts of flooding experienced disproportionately by the poor. In developing countries experiencing rapid urbanization and population growth a key distinction in the urban landscape is between planned development and unplanned, informal development, which often occurs on marginal, flood‐prone land. Flood risk management in the context of informality is challenging, and may exacerbate existing social inequalities and entrench poverty. Here, we adapt an existing socio‐hydrological model of human‐flood interactions to account for a stratified urban society consisting of planned and informal settlements. In the first instance, we use the model to construct four system archetypes based on idealized scenarios of risk reduction and disaster recovery. We then perform a sensitivity analysis to examine the relative importance of the differential values of vulnerability, risk‐aversion, and flood awareness in determining the relationship between flood risk management and social inequality. The model results suggest that reducing the vulnerability of informal communities to flooding plays an important role in reducing social inequality and enabling sustainable economic growth, even when the exposure to the flood hazard remains high. Conversely, our model shows that increasing risk aversion may accelerate the decline of informal communities by suppressing economic growth. On this basis, we argue for urban flood risk management which is rooted in pro‐poor urban governance and planning agendas which recognize the legitimacy and permanence of informal communities in cities. , Key Points The distribution of flood risk in urban areas is uneven, with the negative impacts experienced disproportionately by the urban poor Our model shows that reducing the vulnerability of informal residents to flooding can reduce inequality, even when their exposure is high Based on the model results, we argue that urban flood risk management should be rooted in pro‐poor urban governance and planning agendas

Abstract Climate change is likely to lead to an increase in the frequency and/or intensity of certain types of natural hazards, if not globally, then at least in certain regions. All other things equal, this should lead to an increase in the economic toll from natural disasters over time. Yet, all other things are not equal since affected areas become wealthier over time and rational individuals and governments undertake defensive mitigation measures, which requires normalizing economic losses if one wishes to analyze trends in economic loss from natural disasters for detecting a potential climate change signal. In this article, we argue that the conventional methodology for normalizing economic loss is problematic since it normalizes for changes in wealth over time, but fails to normalize for differences in wealth across space at any given point of time. We introduce an alternative methodology that overcomes this problem in theory, but faces many more problems in its empirical application. Applying, therefore, both methods to the most comprehensive existing global dataset of natural disaster loss, in general we find no significant upward trends in normalized disaster damage over the period 1980–2009 globally, regionally, for specific disasters or for specific disasters in specific regions. Due to our inability to control for defensive mitigation measures, one cannot infer from our analysis that there have definitely not been more frequent and/or more intensive weather-related natural hazards over the study period already. Moreover, it may still be far too early to detect a trend if human-induced climate change has only just started and will gain momentum over time.