Votre recherche

Afin de mieux comprendre la distribution géographique des facilitateurs et des obstacles à la participation sociale des Québécois âgés, cette étude visait à documenter l’Indice du potentiel de participation sociale (IPPS) selon les zones métropolitaines, urbaines et rurales. Des analyses de données secondaires, dont l’Enquête transversale sur la santé des collectivités canadiennes, ont permis de développer et de cartographier un indice composé de facteurs environnementaux associés à la participation sociale, pondérés par une analyse factorielle. En zones métropolitaines, l’IPPS était supérieur au centre qu’en périphérie, compte tenu d’une concentration accrue d’aînés et des transports. Bien qu’atténuée, la configuration était similaire en zones urbaines. En zone rurale, un IPPS élevé était associé à une concentration d’aînés et un accès aux ressources accru, sans configuration spatiale. Pour favoriser la participation sociale, l’IPPS soutient que les transports et l’accès aux ressources doivent respectivement être améliorés en périphérie des métropoles et en zone rurale., AbstractTo better understand the geographic distribution of facilitators of, and barriers to, social participation among older Quebecers, this study aimed to document the Social Participation Potential Index (SPPI; Indice du potentiel de participation sociale) in metropolitan, urban and rural areas. Secondary data analyses, including the Canadian Community Health Survey, were used to develop and map a composite index of environmental factors associated with social participation, weighted by factor analysis. In metropolitan areas, the SPPI was higher in the center than in the periphery, due to an increased concentration of seniors and transportation. Although reduced, the pattern was similar in urban areas. In rural areas, a higher SPPI was associated with an increased concentration of older adults and access to resources, showing no spatial pattern. To promote social participation, the SPPI suggests that transportation and access to resources must be improved in the periphery of metropolitan areas and in rural areas, respectively.

Abstract. Large-scale socioeconomic studies of the impacts of floods are difficult and costly for countries such as Canada and the United States due to the large number of rivers and size of watersheds. Such studies are however very important for analyzing spatial patterns and temporal trends to inform large-scale flood risk management decisions and policies. In this paper, we present different flood occurrence and impact models based upon statistical and machine learning methods of over 31 000 watersheds spread across Canada and the US. The models can be quickly calibrated and thereby easily run predictions over thousands of scenarios in a matter of minutes. As applications of the models, we present the geographical distribution of the modelled average annual number of people displaced due to flooding in Canada and the US, as well as various scenario analyses. We find for example that an increase of 10 % in average precipitation yields an increase in the displaced population of 18 % in Canada and 14 % in the US. The model can therefore be used by a broad range of end users ranging from climate scientists to economists who seek to translate climate and socioeconomic scenarios into flood probabilities and impacts measured in terms of the displaced population.

Nous en connaissons peu sur la pratique d’intervention de groupe en région, ce qui ouvre un champ de questions qui dépassent de loin la simple description des conditions de travail en intervention. Ce travail souhaite valoriser et rendre « visible » la pratique d’intervention de groupe des professionnelles issues du travail social, dans un contexte québécois, et plus spécifiquement dans un environnement de région ressource, environnement qui pose des défis et des enjeux importants reliés à ce mode d’intervention. À travers une recherche qualitative et un processus de théorisation ancrée, ce mode d’intervention a été exploré auprès de 10 intervenantes. Les principaux résultats nous permettent d’identifier les spécificités régionales de l’intervention de groupe, telles qu’une pratique destinée fondamentalement aux femmes avec des approches choisies pour l’intervention, la confidentialité et la protection de la vie privée des participantes du groupe, le manque de transport en commun, et une pratique de groupe plus présente dans le milieu communautaire. , We know little about the practice of group intervention in remote areas, which leads to an array of questions that go far beyond the mere description of working conditions in this context of practice. This article aims to acknowledge and increase visibility of social work with groups in Quebec, most specifically in remote regions where mostly female social work professionals practice this type of intervention, an environment that poses important challenges related to this type of practice. Through qualitative research and a process of grounded theorizing, this type of intervention was explored using feedback from 10 female participants (social workers). The main results highlight regional specificities, such as a practice fundamentally aimed at women, confidentiality and privacy of group participants, the lack of public transportation, and a group practice more present in the community setting

Cet article vise à partager les résultats préliminaires du projet de recherche « Les travailleuses sociales cinq ans après l’implantation de la réforme Barrette : standardisation de la pratique ou nouvelles normes locales des établissements? ». Ce projet de recherche a pour but de mieux comprendre la mise en oeuvre de la réforme du système de santé et des services sociaux de 2015 au Québec. De juin à décembre 2022, près de 60 personnes participantes ont accepté de répondre à un entretien semi-dirigé. La très grande majorité d’entre elles détiennent plus de dix ans d’expérience, ce qui permet de comprendre l’avant et l’après réforme Barrette et de saisir les effets de cette réforme sur les équipes de travail, mais aussi sur la prestation des services fournis à la population. L’analyse initiale des données met en lumière la poursuite, voire l’accentuation, de la perspective descendante (top down) du processus décisionnel, de la reddition de comptes par le biais de mesures quantitatives et de l’harmonisation des services s’illustrant en standardisation des pratiques, en dépit des particularités territoriales inhérentes aux différentes régions du Québec. Par rapport à notre recherche précédente, force est de constater que les méthodes de la nouvelle gestion publique se sont accentuées au sein du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux, qualifié de « maison des fous » par plusieurs personnes participantes.

Abstract Fatalities caused by natural hazards are driven not only by population exposure, but also by their vulnerability to these events, determined by intersecting characteristics such as education, age and income. Empirical evidence of the drivers of social vulnerability, however, is limited due to a lack of relevant data, in particular on a global scale. Consequently, existing global‐scale risk assessments rarely account for social vulnerability. To address this gap, we estimate regression models that predict fatalities caused by past flooding events ( n  = 913) based on potential social vulnerability drivers. Analyzing 47 variables calculated from publicly available spatial data sets, we establish five statistically significant vulnerability variables: mean years of schooling; share of elderly; gender income gap; rural settlements; and walking time to nearest healthcare facility. We use the regression coefficients as weights to calculate the “ Glob al‐ E mpirical So cial V ulnerability I ndex (GlobE‐SoVI)” at a spatial resolution of ∼1 km. We find distinct spatial patterns of vulnerability within and across countries, with low GlobE‐SoVI scores (i.e., 1–2) in for example, Northern America, northern Europe, and Australia; and high scores (i.e., 9–10) in for example, northern Africa, the Middle East, and southern Asia. Globally, education has the highest relative contribution to vulnerability (roughly 58%), acting as a driver that reduces vulnerability; all other drivers increase vulnerability, with the gender income gap contributing ∼24% and the elderly another 11%. Due to its empirical foundation, the GlobE‐SoVI advances our understanding of social vulnerability drivers at global scale and can be used for global (flood) risk assessments. , Plain Language Summary Social vulnerability is rarely accounted for in global‐scale risk assessments. We develop an empirical social vulnerability map (“GlobE‐SoVI”) based on five key drivers of social vulnerability to flooding, that is, education, elderly, income inequality, rural settlements and travel time to healthcare, which we establish based on flood fatalities caused by past flooding events. Globally, we find education to have a high and reducing effect on social vulnerability, while all other drivers increase vulnerability. Integrating social vulnerability in global‐scale (flood) risk assessments can help inform global policy frameworks that aim to reduce risks posed by natural hazards and climate change as well as to foster more equitable development globally. , Key Points We develop a global map of social vulnerability at ∼1 km spatial resolution based on five key vulnerability drivers (“GlobE‐SoVI”) We establish vulnerability drivers empirically based on their contribution to predicting fatalities caused by past flooding events Accounting for social vulnerability in global‐scale (flood) risk assessments can inform global policy frameworks that aim to reduce risk

Abstract High-resolution global flood risk maps are increasingly used to inform disaster risk planning and response, particularly in lower income countries with limited data or capacity. However, current approaches do not adequately account for spatial variation in social vulnerability, which is a key determinant of variation in outcomes for exposed populations. Here we integrate annual average exceedance probability estimates from a high-resolution fluvial flood model with gridded population and poverty data to create a global vulnerability-adjusted risk index for flooding (VARI Flood) at 90-meter resolution. The index provides estimates of relative risk within or between countries and changes how we understand the geography of risk by identifying ‘hotspots’ characterised by high population density and high levels of social vulnerability. This approach, which emphasises risks to human well-being, could be used as a complement to traditional population or asset-centred approaches.