Votre recherche

Abstract The flood-prone Saint John River (SJR, Wolastoq), which lies within a drainage basin of 55 110 km 2 , flows a length of 673 km from its source in northern Maine, United States, to its mouth in southern New Brunswick, Canada. Major industries in the basin include forestry, agriculture, and hydroelectric power. During the 1991–2020 reference period, the SJR basin (SJRB) experienced major spring flood events in 2008, 2018, and 2019. As part of the Saint John River Experiment on Cold Season Storms, the objective of this research is to characterize and contrast these three major spring flood events. Given that the floods all occurred during spring, the hypothesis being tested is that rapid snowmelt alone is the dominant driver of flooding in the SJRB. There were commonalities and differences regarding the contributing factors of the three flood years. When averaged across the upper basin, they showed consistency in terms of positive winter and spring total precipitation anomalies, positive snow water equivalent anomalies, and steep increases in April cumulative runoff. Rain-on-snow events were a prominent feature of all three flood years. However, differences between flood years were also evident, including inconsistencies with respect to ice jams and high tides. Certain factors were present in only one or two of the three flood years, including positive total precipitation anomalies in spring, positive heavy liquid precipitation anomalies in spring, positive heavy solid precipitation anomalies in winter, and positive temperature anomalies in spring. The dominant factor contributing to peak water levels was rapid snowmelt.

Exposure and vulnerability are the main contributing factors of growing impact from climate-related disasters globally. Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamic patterns of vulnerability is important for designing effective disaster risk mitigation and adaptation measures. At national scale, most cross-country studies have suggested that economic vulnerability to disasters decreases as income increases, especially for developing countries. Research covering sub-national climate-related natural disasters is indispensable to obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the effect of regional economic growth on vulnerability reduction. Taking China as a case, this subnational scale study shows that economic development is correlated with the significant reduction in human fatalities but increase in direct economic losses (DELs) from climate-related disasters since 1949. The long-term trend in climate-related disaster vulnerability, reflected by mortality (1978–2015) and DELs (1990–2015) as a share of the total population and Gross Domestic Product, has seen significant decline among all economic regions in China. While notable differences remain among its West, Central and East economic regions, the temporal vulnerability change has been converging. The study further demonstrated that economic development level is correlated with human and economic vulnerability to climate-related disasters, and this vulnerability decreased with the increase of per-capita income. This study suggested that economic development can have nuanced effects on overall human and economic vulnerability to climate-related disasters. We argue that climate change science needs to acknowledge and examine the different pathways of vulnerability effects related to economic development.

This paper examines the extent to which economic development decreases a country's risk of experiencing climate-related disasters as well as the societal impacts of those events. The paper proceeds from the underlying assumption that disasters are not inherently natural, but arise from the intersection of naturally-occurring hazards within fragile environments. It uses data from the International Disaster Database (EM-DAT),(1) representing country-year-level observations over the period 1980-2007. The study finds that low-income countries are significantly more at risk of climate-related disasters, even after controlling for exposure to climate hazards and other factors that may confound disaster reporting. Following the occurrence of a disaster, higher income generally diminishes a country's social vulnerability to such happenings, resulting in lower levels of mortality and morbidity. This implies that continued economic development may be a powerful tool for lessening social vulnerability to climate change.© 2016 The Author(s). Disasters © Overseas Development Institute, 2016. Language: en

Disasters such as floods, storms, heatwaves and droughts can have enormous implications for health, the environment and economic development. In this article, we address the question of how climate change might have influenced the impact of weather-related disasters. This relation is not straightforward, since disaster burden is not influenced by weather and climate events alone—other drivers are growth in population and wealth, and changes in vulnerability. We normalized disaster impacts, analyzed trends in the data and compared them with trends in extreme weather and climate events and vulnerability, following a 3 by 4 by 3 set-up, with three disaster burden categories, four regions and three extreme weather event categories. The trends in normalized disaster impacts show large differences between regions and weather event categories. Despite these variations, our overall conclusion is that the increasing exposure of people and economic assets is the major cause of increasing trends in disaster impacts. This holds for long-term trends in economic losses as well as the number of people affected. We also found similar, though more qualitative, results for the number of people killed; in all three cases, the role played by climate change cannot be excluded. Furthermore, we found that trends in historic vulnerability tend to be stable over time, despite adaptation measures taken by countries. Based on these findings, we derived disaster impact projections for the coming decades. We argue that projections beyond 2030 are too uncertain, not only due to unknown changes in vulnerability, but also due to increasing non-stationarities in normalization relations.

Flooding has only relatively recently been considered as an environmental justice issue. In this paper we focus on flooding as a distinct form of environmental risk and examine some of the key evidence and analysis that is needed to underpin an environmental justice framing of flood risk and flood impacts. We review and examine the UK situation and the body of existing research literature on flooding to fill out our understanding of the patterns of social inequality that exist in relation to both flood risk exposure and vulnerability to the diverse impacts of flooding. We then consider the various ways in which judgements might be made about the injustice or justice of these inequalities and the ways in which they are being sustained or responded to by current flood policy and practice. We conclude that there is both evidence of significant inequalities and grounds on which claims of injustice might be made, but that further work is needed to investigate each of these. The case for pursuing the framing of flooding as an environmental justice issue is also made.

Global environmental change and sustainability science increasingly recognize the need to address the consequences of changes taking place in the structure and function of the biosphere. These changes raise questions such as: Who and what are vulnerable to the multiple environmental changes underway, and where? Research demonstrates that vulnerability is registered not by exposure to hazards (perturbations and stresses) alone but also resides in the sensitivity and resilience of the system experiencing such hazards. This recognition requires revisions and enlargements in the basic design of vulnerability assessments, including the capacity to treat coupled human–environment systems and those linkages within and without the systems that affect their vulnerability. A vulnerability framework for the assessment of coupled human–environment systems is presented.

Many disasters are a complex mix of natural hazards and human action. At Risk argues that the social, political and economic environment is as much a cause of disasters as the natural environment. Published within the International Decade of Natural Hazard Reduction, this book suggests ways in which both the social and natural sciences can be analytically combined through a 'disaster pressure and release' model. Arguing that the concept of vulnerability is central to an understanding of disasters and their prevention or mitigation, the authors explore the extent and ways in which people gain access to resources. Individual chapters apply analytical concepts to famines and drought, biological hazards, floods, coastal storms, and earthquakes, volcanos and landslides - the hazards that become disasters'. Finally, the book draws practical and policy conclusions to promote a safer environment and reduce vulnerability.

Abstract Global flood impacts have risen in recent decades. While increasing exposure was the dominant driver of surging impacts, counteracting vulnerability reductions have been detected, but were too weak to reverse this trend. To assess the ongoing progress on vulnerability reduction, we combine a recently available dataset of flooded areas derived from satellite imagery for 913 events with four global disaster databases and socio-economic data. Event-specific flood vulnerabilities for assets, fatalities and displacements reveal a lack of progress in reducing global flood vulnerability from 2000—2018. We examine the relationship between vulnerabilities and human development, inequality, flood exposure and local structural characteristics. We find that vulnerability levels are significantly lower in areas with good structural characteristics and significantly higher in low developed areas. However, socio-economic development was insufficient to reduce vulnerabilities over the study period. Nevertheless, the strong correlation between vulnerability and structural characteristics suggests further potential for adaptation through vulnerability reduction.

Abstract To increase the resilience of communities against floods, it is necessary to develop methodologies to estimate the vulnerability. The concept of vulnerability is multidimensional, but most flood vulnerability studies have focused only on the social approach. Nevertheless, in recent years, following seismic analysis, the physical point of view has increased its relevance. Therefore, the present study proposes a methodology to map the flood physical vulnerability and applies it using an index at urban parcel scale for a medium-sized town (Ponferrada, Spain). This index is based on multiple indicators fed by geographical open-source data, once they have been normalized and combined with different weights extracted from an Analytic Hierarchic Process. The results show a raster map of the physical vulnerability index that facilitates future emergency and flood risk management to diminish potential damages. A total of 22.7% of the urban parcels in the studied town present an index value higher than 0.4, which is considered highly vulnerable. The location of these urban parcels would have passed unnoticed without the use of open governmental datasets, when an average value would have been calculated for the overall municipality. Moreover, the building percentage covered by water was the most influential indicator in the study area, where the simulated flood was generated by an alleged dam break. The study exceeds the spatial constraints of collecting this type of data by direct interviews with inhabitants and allows for working with larger areas, identifying the physical buildings and infrastructure differences among the urban parcels.

RÉSUMÉ : Les inondations dans la MRC de Bonaventure, à l'instar des inondations de 2017 et de 2019 aux Québec, amènent à repenser les politiques de gestion préventive des inondations dans les municipalités mais il est nécessaire de revisiter le passé pour mieux anticiper le futur. A l'heure actuelle, aucune étude dans la MRC de Bonaventure n'a abordé la trajectoire de la vulnérabilité aux inondations. Le projet de recherche avait pour objectif d'évaluer l'évolution spatio-temporelle de la vulnérabilité aux inondations dans la MRC de Bonaventure plus précisément dans les bassins versants des rivières Cascapédia et petite Cascapédia. Cette recherche s'est particulièrement intéressée à : - 1) - identifier les indicateurs de vulnérabilité aux inondations les plus pertinents et leurs interactions et - 2) - comprendre la trajectoire de la vulnérabilité aux inondations dans le temps. La méthode indicielle a permis de calculer les indices de vulnérabilité par addition d'indicateurs pondérés dans l'analyse de la trajectoire de la vulnérabilité pour les années 1986, 1996, 2006 et de 2016 à partir de 43 indicateurs sélectionnés, adaptés au contexte de la zone d'étude et validés par la MRC de Bonaventure. L'évaluation de la trajectoire de la vulnérabilité aux inondations révèle que les variables socio-économiques sont les plus importantes contribuant à faire varier la vulnérabilité dans le temps dans les corridors fluviaux des rivières Cascapédia et petite Cascapédia. Cette étude expose le caractère dynamique, temporel et transformationnel de la vulnérabilité. Les cartographies de vulnérabilité générées en maillages de 200 m x 200 m et les enquêtes sur le terrain ont permis de mieux appréhender les changements globaux qui ont contribué à l'évolution de la vulnérabilité aux inondations et de comprendre la nature de la vulnérabilité aux inondations. Cette analyse permettra aux décideurs d'anticiper le futur pour une planification concrète de l'adaptation et des mesures de prévention. La trajectoire de la vulnérabilité se présente alors comme un outil de prévention et de prospection pour les décideurs. Elle permet d'appréhender la vulnérabilité du passé, comprendre la vulnérabilité du présent et anticiper sur la vulnérabilité du futur. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : Trajectoire, vulnérabilité, inondation, indice de vulnérabilité, gestion préventive. -- ABSTRACT : The floods in the MRC of Bonaventure, like the floods of 2017 and 2019 in Quebec, lead to a rethink of the preventive flood management policies in the municipalities, but it is necessary to revisit the past to better anticipate the future. At present, no study in the MRC of Bonaventure has addressed the trajectory of vulnerability to flooding. The objective of the research project was to assess the spatio-temporal evolution of vulnerability to flooding in the MRC of Bonaventure, more specifically in the watersheds of the Cascapedia and Petite Cascapedia rivers. This research was particularly interested in: - 1) - identifying the most relevant flood vulnerability indicators and their interactions and - 2) - understanding the trajectory of flood vulnerability over time. The index method made it possible to calculate the vulnerability indices by adding weighted indicators in the analysis of the trajectory of vulnerability for the years 1986, 1996, 2006 and 2016 from 43 selected indicators, adapted to the context of the study area and validated by the MRC of Bonaventure. The evaluation of the trajectory of vulnerability to flooding reveals that socio-economic variables are the most important contributing to varying vulnerability over time in the fluvial corridors of the Cascapedia and Petite Cascapedia rivers. This study exposes the dynamic, temporal and transformational character of vulnerability. The vulnerability maps generated in 200 m x 200 m grids and the field surveys have made it possible to better understand the global changes that have contributed to the evolution of vulnerability to floods and to understand the nature of vulnerability to floods. This analysis will allow decision-makers to anticipate the future for concrete planning of adaptation and prevention measures. The trajectory of vulnerability is then presented as a prevention and prospecting tool for decision-makers. It makes it possible to apprehend the vulnerability of the past, to understand the vulnerability of the present and to anticipate the vulnerability of the future. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : Trajectory, vulnerability, flooding, vulnerability index, preventive management.

Recent disasters have demonstrated the challenges faced by society as a result of the increasing complexity of disaster risk. In this perspective article, we discuss the complex interactions between hazards and vulnerability and suggest methodological approaches to assess and include dynamics of vulnerability in our risk assessments, learning from the compound and multi-hazard, socio-hydrology, and socio-ecological research communities. We argue for a changed perspective, starting with the circumstances that determine dynamic vulnerability. We identify three types of dynamics of vulnerability: (1) the underlying dynamics of vulnerability, (2) changes in vulnerability during long-lasting disasters, and (3) changes in vulnerability during compounding disasters and societal shocks. We conclude that there is great potential to capture the dynamics of vulnerability using qualitative and model-based methods, both for reproducing historic and projecting future dynamics of vulnerability. We provide examples using narratives, agent-based models, and system dynamics.