Votre recherche

The UQAM Heatwave ERA5 Archive and Temperatures (U-HEAT) catalog is a global dataset of temperature and heatwave data spanning 1940 to 2022. The temperature data features the maximum daily 2-m temperature, the 90th percentile of the maximum daily 2-m temperature, and an indication as to whether a given location (grid point) is experiencing a heatwave or not on a given day. The heatwave data includes metrics such as the duration, the cumulated intensity and the maximum intensity of heatwaves occuring in the study period as well as their location (grid point) and start date. Both the temperature and the heatwave metrics data were calculated from the ERA5 data produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). More information on the catalog can be found in the documentation and the README files. Le catalogue UQAM Heatwave ERA5 Archive and Temperatures (U-HEAT) est un jeu de données global de température et de vague de chaleur pour la période entre 1940 et 2022. Les données de température comprennent le maximum quotidien de la température à 2m, le 90e percentile du maximum quotidien de la température à 2m et une indication permettant de savoir si un lieu donné (point de grille) subit ou non une vague de chaleur pour un jour donné. Les données de vague de chaleur incluent des métriques comme la durée, l'intensité cumulée et l'intensité maximale de vagues de chaleur qui se sont produites durant la période d'étude en plus de leur emplacement (point de grille) et leur date de début. Les données de température et de vague de chaleur ont été calculées à partir du jeu de données ERA5 produit par le European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Le fichier de documentation et le fichier README peuvent être consultés pour obtenir plus d'information à propos du catalogue.

Abstract A significant increase in reactive nitrogen (N) added to terrestrial ecosystems through agricultural fertilization or atmospheric deposition is considered to be one of the most widespread drivers of global change. Modifying biomass allocation is one primary strategy for maximizing plant growth rate, survival, and adaptability to various biotic and abiotic stresses. However, there is much uncertainty as to whether and how plant biomass allocation strategies change in response to increased N inputs in terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we synthesized 3516 paired observations of plant biomass and their components related to N additions across terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. Our meta‐analysis reveals that N addition (ranging from 1.08 to 113.81 g m −2  year −1 ) increased terrestrial plant biomass by 55.6% on average. N addition has increased plant stem mass fraction, shoot mass fraction, and leaf mass fraction by 13.8%, 12.9%, and 13.4%, respectively, but with an associated decrease in plant reproductive mass (including flower and fruit biomass) fraction by 3.4%. We further documented a reduction in plant root‐shoot ratio and root mass fraction by 27% (21.8%–32.1%) and 14.7% (11.6%–17.8%), respectively, in response to N addition. Meta‐regression results showed that N addition effects on plant biomass were positively correlated with mean annual temperature, soil available phosphorus, soil total potassium, specific leaf area, and leaf area per plant. Nevertheless, they were negatively correlated with soil total N, leaf carbon/N ratio, leaf carbon and N content per leaf area, as well as the amount and duration of N addition. In summary, our meta‐analysis suggests that N addition may alter terrestrial plant biomass allocation strategies, leading to more biomass being allocated to aboveground organs than belowground organs and growth versus reproductive trade‐offs. At the global scale, leaf functional traits may dictate how plant species change their biomass allocation pattern in response to N addition.

Abstract Increased greenhouse gas emissions are causing unprecedented climate change, which is, in turn, altering emissions and removals (referring to the oxidation of atmospheric CH 4 by methanotrophs within the soil) of the atmospheric CH 4 in terrestrial ecosystems. In the global CH 4 budget, wetlands are the dominant natural source and upland soils are the primary biological sink. However, it is unclear whether and how the soil CH 4 exchanges across terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere will be affected by warming and changes in precipitation patterns. Here, we synthesize 762 observations of in situ soil CH 4 flux data based on the chamber method from the past three decades related to temperature and precipitation changes across major terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. Our meta‐analysis reveals that warming (average warming of +2°C) promotes upland soil CH 4 uptake and wetland soil CH 4 emission. Decreased precipitation (ranging from −100% to −7% of local mean annual precipitation) stimulates upland soil CH 4 uptake. Increased precipitation (ranging from +4% to +94% of local mean annual precipitation) accelerates the upland soil CH 4 emission. By 2100, under the shared socioeconomic pathway with a high radiative forcing level (SSP585), CH 4 emissions from global terrestrial ecosystems will increase by 22.8 ± 3.6 Tg CH 4  yr −1 as an additional CH 4 source, which may be mainly attributed to the increase in precipitation over 30°N latitudes. Our meta‐analysis strongly suggests that future climate change would weaken the natural buffering ability of terrestrial ecosystems on CH 4 fluxes and thus contributes to a positive feedback spiral. , Plain Language Summary This study is the first investigation to include scenarios of CH 4 sink–source transition due to climate change and provides the global estimate of soil CH 4 budgets in natural terrestrial ecosystems in the context of climate change. The enhanced effect of climate change on CH 4 emissions was mainly attributed to increased CH 4 emissions from natural upland ecosystems. Although an increased CH 4 uptake by forest and grassland soils caused by increased temperature and decreased precipitation can offset some part of additional CH 4 sources, the substantial increase of increased precipitation on CH 4 emissions makes these sinks insignificant. These findings highlight that future climate change would weaken the natural buffering ability of terrestrial ecosystems on CH 4 emissions and thus form a positive feedback spiral between methane emissions and climate change. , Key Points This study is the first CH 4 budget investigation to include CH 4 sink‐source transition due to climate change Climate change is estimated to add 22.8 ± 3.6 Tg CH 4  yr −1 emission by 2100 under the high socioeconomic pathway Climate change weakens the buffering capacity of upland soils to CH 4 emissions

This dataset contains the observation data used to prepare the thesis of Mathieu Lachapelle. It contains radar data, laser-optical disdrometer data, standard meteorological data, manual observations, and macrophotography recorded during four ice pellet events that occurred in 2019 and 2020. The ice pellet episodes occurred in the Montreal region and most observational data were collected at UQAM-PK weather station, on the rooftop of President Kennedy building, in Downtown Montreal. More documentation is available in the READMEs provided with the dataset. Cette base de données contient les données d'observation utilisées pour rédiger la thèse de Mathieu Lachapelle. Elle inclut des données radar, des données d'un disdromètre optique, des mesures météorologiques de base, des observations manuelles et des macro photographies collectées pendant quatre épisodes de grésil qui se sont produit en 2019 et en 2020. Les épisodes de grésil ont eu lieu dans la région de Montréal et la plupart des données d'observation ont été collectées à la station météo UQAM-PK, installée sur le toit du bâtiment Président-Kennedy au centre-ville de Montréal. Davantage de documentation est accessible via les fichiers READMEs inclus dans la base de données.

Abstract Accurate estimations of the precipitation phase at the surface are critical for hydrological and snowpack modelling in cold regions. Precipitation phase partitioning methods (PPMs) vary in their ability to estimate the precipitation phase at around 0°C and can significantly impact simulations of snowpack accumulation and melt. The goal of this study is to evaluate PPMs of varying complexity using high‐quality observations of precipitation phase and to assess the impact on snowpack simulations. We used meteorological data collected in Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada, during the 2021 Saint John River Experiment on Cold Season Storms (SAJESS). These data were combined with manual observations of snow depth. Five PPMs commonly used in hydrological models were tested against observations from a laser‐optical disdrometer and a Micro Rain Radar. Most PPMs produced similar accuracy in estimating only rainfall and snowfall. Mixed precipitation was the most difficult phase to predict. The multi‐physics model Crocus was then used to simulate snowpack evolution and to diagnose model sensitivity to snowpack accumulation processes (PPM, snowfall density, and snowpack compaction). Sixteen snowpack accumulation periods, including nine warm accumulation events (average temperatures above −2°C) were observed during the study period. When considering all accumulation events, simulated changes in snow water equivalent ( SWE ) were more sensitive to the type of PPM used, whereas simulated changes in snow depth were more sensitive to uncertainties in snowfall density. Choice of PPM was the main source of model sensitivity for changes in SWE and snow depth when only considering warm events. Overall, this study highlights the impact of precipitation phase estimations on snowpack accumulation at the surface during near‐0°C conditions.

Abstract Precipitation changes modify C, N, and P cycles, which regulate the functions and structure of terrestrial ecosystems. Although altered precipitation affects above‐ and belowground C:N:P stoichiometry, considerable uncertainties remain regarding plant–microbial nutrient allocation strategies under increased (IPPT) and decreased (DPPT) precipitation. We meta‐analyzed 827 observations from 235 field studies to investigate the effects of IPPT and DPPT on the C:N:P stoichiometry of plants, soils, and microorganisms. DPPT reduced leaf C:N ratio, but increased the leaf and root N:P ratios reflecting stronger decrease of P compared with N mobility in soil under drought. IPPT increased microbial biomass C (+13%), N (+15%), P (26%), and the C:N ratio, whereas DPPT decreased microbial biomass N (−12%) and the N:P ratio. The C:N and N:P ratios of plant leaves were more sensitive to medium DPPT than to IPPT because drought increased plant N content, particularly in humid areas. The responses of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry to altered precipitation did not fit the double asymmetry model with a positive asymmetry under IPPT and a negative asymmetry under extreme DPPT. Soil microorganisms were more sensitive to IPPT than to DPPT, but they were more sensitive to extreme DPPT than extreme IPPT, consistent with the double asymmetry model. Soil microorganisms maintained stoichiometric homeostasis, whereas N:P ratios of plants follow that of the soils under altered precipitation. In conclusion, specific N allocation strategies of plants and microbial communities as well as N and P availability in soil critically mediate C:N:P stoichiometry by altered precipitation that need to be considered by prediction of ecosystem functions and C cycling under future climate change scenarios.

Abstract Canada's boreal forests, which occupy approximately 30% of boreal forests worldwide, play an important role in the global carbon budget. However, there is little quantitative information available regarding the spatiotemporal changes in the drought‐induced tree mortality of Canada's boreal forests overall and their associated impacts on biomass carbon dynamics. Here, we develop spatiotemporally explicit estimates of drought‐induced tree mortality and corresponding biomass carbon sink capacity changes in Canada's boreal forests from 1970 to 2020. We show that the average annual tree mortality rate is approximately 2.7%. Approximately 43% of Canada's boreal forests have experienced significantly increasing tree mortality trends (71% of which are located in the western region of the country), and these trends have accelerated since 2002. This increase in tree mortality has resulted in significant biomass carbon losses at an approximate rate of 1.51 ± 0.29 MgC ha −1  year −1 (95% confidence interval) with an approximate total loss of 0.46 ± 0.09 PgC year −1 (95% confidence interval). Under the drought condition increases predicted for this century, the capacity of Canada's boreal forests to act as a carbon sink will be further reduced, potentially leading to a significant positive climate feedback effect.