Votre recherche

Abstract Natural vegetation restoration can enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, but the mechanisms and control factors underlying SOC sequestration are still unknown. The objectives of the study are to quantify the temporal variation of soil and aggregate‐associated organic carbon (OC) and identify factors controlling the variation following natural vegetation restoration after farmland abandonment. We collected soils from sites having 5, 30, 60, 100, and 160 years of a natural vegetation restoration chronosequence after farmland abandonment in the Loess Plateau, China. The results showed that natural vegetation restoration increased macroaggregates (0.25–2 mm; 46.6% to 73.9%), SOC (2.27 to 9.81 g kg −1 ), and aggregate OC (7.33 to 36.98 g kg −1 ) in the top 20‐cm soil compared with abandoned farmland, and the increases mainly occurred in the early stage (<60 years). The increase of SOC was contributed by OC accumulated in macroaggregates (0.25–2 mm) rather than microaggregates (≤0.25 mm). Moreover, SOC sequestration in the topsoil (0–10 cm) was mainly determined by fine root biomass (FR), labile organic carbon (LOC), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC). And in the subsoil (10–20 cm), SOC sequestration was mainly determined by the proportion of macroaggregates. The results suggest that natural vegetation restoration increased SOC and aggregate OC, and FR, MBC, LOC, and the physical protection of aggregates played important roles in regulating SOC and aggregate OC.

Abstract Soil erosion occurs extensively across China, leading to severe degradation of the land and ecosystem services. However, the spatial and temporal variations in soil erodibility ( k ) and the distribution of soil erosion across land use types and slopes remain unclear. We synthesized the results from 325 sites published in 152 literatures to analyze the factors affecting the k , such as land use type, climate, topography, soil, and vegetation restoration age. The results showed that areas with slopes >25° had a larger k factor ( k =  0.1047) than did those with slope <6° ( k =  0.0637) or 6–25° ( k =  0.0832). The k from 2006 to 2011 ( k =  0.0725) was higher than that from 1999 to 2005 ( k =  0.058) and that from 2012 to 2016 ( k =  0.0631). The k value initially increased with vegetation restoration age and then gradually decreased. Land use also had an impact on the k factor, with the k factor of cropland ( k =  0.0697) being higher than that of grassland ( k =  0.0663) but lower than that of forest ( k =  0.0967). Across China, North Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, and South Guizhou, which are located in the Loess Plateau in Northwest China, the Black Soil region of Northeast China, and the Karst areas in Southwest China, respectively, were the three most severely eroded regions due to hydraulic erosion, frost‐thaw erosion, and high‐intensity erosion, respectively. Overall, the most important factors affecting the k were soil characteristics, followed by topography and climate. Among them, soil nitrogen and precipitation were the two most critical factors influencing the k . , Key Points Grassland had lower soil erodibility than had cropland and forestland North Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, and South Guizhou were the three most severely eroded regions Precipitation and soil N play critical roles in controlling soil erosion

Abstract The effects of nitrogen (N) deposition on soil organic carbon (C) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in terrestrial ecosystems are the main drivers affecting GHG budgets under global climate change. Although many studies have been conducted on this topic, we still have little understanding of how N deposition affects soil C pools and GHG budgets at the global scale. We synthesized a comprehensive dataset of 275 sites from multiple terrestrial ecosystems around the world and quantified the responses of the global soil C pool and GHG fluxes induced by N enrichment. The results showed that the soil organic C concentration and the soil CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O emissions increased by an average of 3.7%, 0.3%, 24.3% and 91.3% under N enrichment, respectively, and that the soil CH 4 uptake decreased by 6.0%. Furthermore, the percentage increase in N 2 O emissions (91.3%) was two times lower than that (215%) reported by Liu and Greaver ( Ecology Letters , 2009, 12:1103–1117). There was also greater stimulation of soil C pools (15.70 kg C ha −1  year −1 per kg N ha −1  year −1 ) than previously reported under N deposition globally. The global N deposition results showed that croplands were the largest GHG sources (calculated as CO 2 equivalents), followed by wetlands. However, forests and grasslands were two important GHG sinks. Globally, N deposition increased the terrestrial soil C sink by 6.34 Pg CO 2 /year. It also increased net soil GHG emissions by 10.20 Pg CO 2 ‐Geq (CO 2 equivalents)/year. Therefore, N deposition not only increased the size of the soil C pool but also increased global GHG emissions, as calculated by the global warming potential approach.

Abstract Precipitation changes modify C, N, and P cycles, which regulate the functions and structure of terrestrial ecosystems. Although altered precipitation affects above‐ and belowground C:N:P stoichiometry, considerable uncertainties remain regarding plant–microbial nutrient allocation strategies under increased (IPPT) and decreased (DPPT) precipitation. We meta‐analyzed 827 observations from 235 field studies to investigate the effects of IPPT and DPPT on the C:N:P stoichiometry of plants, soils, and microorganisms. DPPT reduced leaf C:N ratio, but increased the leaf and root N:P ratios reflecting stronger decrease of P compared with N mobility in soil under drought. IPPT increased microbial biomass C (+13%), N (+15%), P (26%), and the C:N ratio, whereas DPPT decreased microbial biomass N (−12%) and the N:P ratio. The C:N and N:P ratios of plant leaves were more sensitive to medium DPPT than to IPPT because drought increased plant N content, particularly in humid areas. The responses of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry to altered precipitation did not fit the double asymmetry model with a positive asymmetry under IPPT and a negative asymmetry under extreme DPPT. Soil microorganisms were more sensitive to IPPT than to DPPT, but they were more sensitive to extreme DPPT than extreme IPPT, consistent with the double asymmetry model. Soil microorganisms maintained stoichiometric homeostasis, whereas N:P ratios of plants follow that of the soils under altered precipitation. In conclusion, specific N allocation strategies of plants and microbial communities as well as N and P availability in soil critically mediate C:N:P stoichiometry by altered precipitation that need to be considered by prediction of ecosystem functions and C cycling under future climate change scenarios.

Abstract Globally, livestock grazing is an important management factor influencing soil degradation, soil health and carbon (C) stocks of grassland ecosystems. However, the effects of grassland types, grazing intensity and grazing duration on C stocks are unclear across large geographic scales. To provide a more comprehensive assessment of how grazing drives ecosystem C stocks in grasslands, we compiled and analyzed data from 306 studies featuring four grassland types across China: desert steppes, typical steppes, meadow steppes and alpine steppes. Light grazing was the best management practice for desert steppes (< 2 sheep ha −1 ) and typical steppes (3 to 4 sheep ha −1 ), whereas medium grazing pressure was optimal for meadow steppes (5 to 6 sheep ha −1 ) and alpine steppes (7 to 8 sheep ha −1 ) leading to the highest ecosystem C stocks under grazing. Plant biomass (desert steppes) and soil C stocks (meadow steppes) increased under light or medium grazing, confirming the ‘ intermediate disturbance hypothesis ’. Heavy grazing decreased all C stocks regardless of grassland ecosystem types, approximately 1.4 Mg ha −1 per year for the whole ecosystem. The regrowth and regeneration of grasslands in response to grazing intensity (i.e., grazing optimization ) depended on grassland types and grazing duration. In conclusion, grassland grazing is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, proper management (light or medium grazing) can maintain and even increase C stocks above- and belowground, and increase the harvested livestock products from grasslands. On the other hand, human-induced overgrazing can lead to rapid degradation of vegetation and soils, resulting in significant carbon loss and requiring long-term recovery. Grazing regimes (i.e., intensity and duration applied) must consider specific grassland characteristics to ensure stable productivity rates and optimal impacts on ecosystem C stocks. Graphical Abstract