Votre recherche
Résultats 2 ressources
-
Abstract Elevated nitrogen (N) deposition alters the terrestrial carbon (C) cycle, which is likely to feed back to further climate change. However, how the overall terrestrial ecosystem C pools and fluxes respond to N addition remains unclear. By synthesizing data from multiple terrestrial ecosystems, we quantified the response of C pools and fluxes to experimental N addition using a comprehensive meta-analysis method. Our results showed that N addition significantly stimulated soil total C storage by 5.82% ([2.47%, 9.27%], 95% CI, the same below) and increased the C contents of the above- and below-ground parts of plants by 25.65% [11.07%, 42.12%] and 15.93% [6.80%, 25.85%], respectively. Furthermore, N addition significantly increased aboveground net primary production by 52.38% [40.58%, 65.19%] and litterfall by 14.67% [9.24%, 20.38%] at a global scale. However, the C influx from the plant litter to the soil through litter decomposition and the efflux from the soil due to microbial respiration and soil respiration showed insignificant responses to N addition. Overall, our meta-analysis suggested that N addition will increase soil C storage and plant C in both above- and below-ground parts, indicating that terrestrial ecosystems might act to strengthen as a C sink under increasing N deposition.
-
Abstract Aim Plant biomass allocation reflects the distribution of photosynthates among different organs in response to changing environmental conditions. Global change influences plant growth across terrestrial ecosystems, but impacts of individual and combined multiple global change factors (GCFs) on plant biomass allocation at the global scale are unclear. Location Global. Time period Contemporary. Major taxa studied Plants in terrestrial ecosystems. Methods We conducted a meta‐analysis of data comprising 4,180 pairwise observations to assess individual and combined effects of nitrogen addition (N), warming (W), elevated CO 2 (C), irrigation (I), and drought (D) on plant biomass allocation based on the ‘ratio‐based optimal partitioning’ and ‘isometric allocation’ hypotheses. Results We found that (a) ratio‐based plant biomass fractions of different organs were only minimally affected by individual and combined effects of the studied GCFs; (b) combined effects of two‐factor pairs of GCFs on plant biomass allocation were commonly additive, rather than synergistic or antagonistic; (c) moderator variables influenced, but seldom changed the direction of individual and combined effects of GCFs on plant biomass allocation; and (d) neither individual nor combined effects of the studied GCFs altered allometric relationships among different organs, indicating that patterns of plant biomass allocation under the environmental stress conditions exerted by the multiple GCFs were better explained by the isometric allocation rather than the ratio‐based optimal partitioning hypothesis. Main conclusions Our results show consistent patterns of allometric plant biomass partitioning under effects of multiple GCFs and provide evidence of an isometric plant biomass allocation trajectory in response to global change perturbations. These findings improve our understanding and prediction of terrestrial vegetation responses to future global change scenarios.