Votre recherche
Résultats 8 ressources
-
One of the recent attempts to explore epistemic dimensions of forced displacement focuses on the institution of gender-based asylum and hopes to detect forms of epistemic injustice within assessments of gender related asylum applications. Following this attempt, I aim in this paper to demonstrate how the institution of gender-based asylum is structured to produce epistemic injustice at least in the forms of testimonial injustice and contributory injustice. This structural limit becomes visible when we realize how the institution of asylum is formed to provide legitimacy to the institutional comfort the respective migration courts and boards enjoy. This institutional comfort afforded to migration boards and courts by the existing asylum regimes in the current order of nation-states leads to a systemic prioritization of state actors’ epistemic resources rather than that of applicants, which, in turn, results in epistemic injustice and impacts the determination of applicants’ refugee status.
-
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker’s account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.
-
This is a bold take on the crucial role of emotion in politics. Emotions work to define who we are as well as shape what we do and this is no more powerfully at play than in the world of politics. Ahmed considers how emotions keep us invested in relationships of power, and also shows how this use of emotion could be crucial to feminist and queer political movements. Debates on international terrorism, asylum and migration, as well as reconciliation and reparation are explored through topical case studies. In this textbook the difficult issues are confronted head on. New for this edition: a substantial 15,000-word Afterword on 'Emotions and Their Objects' which provides an original contribution to the burgeoning field of affect studies; a revised Bibliography; and updated throughout.
-
In Epistemic injustice, Miranda Fricker makes a tremendous contribution to theorizing the intersection of social epistemology with theories of justice. Theories of justice often take as their object of assessment either interpersonal transactions (specific exchanges between persons) or particular institutions. They may also take a more comprehensive perspective in assessing systems of institutions. This systemic perspective may enable control of the cumulative effects of millions of individual transactions that cannot be controlled at the individual or institutional levels. This is true not only with respect to the overall distribution of such goods as income and wealth, but also with respect to the goods of testimonial and hermeneutical justice. Cognitive biases that may be difficult for even epistemically virtuous individuals to correct on their own may be more susceptible to correction if we focus on the principles that should govern our systems of testimonial gathering and assessment. Hence, while Fricker’s focus on individual epistemic virtue is important, we also need to consider what epistemic justice as a virtue of social systems would require. My paper will indicate some directions forward on this front, focusing on the need for integration of diverse institutions and persons engaged in inquiry.
-
Ce livre retrace le parcours théorique de la notion de dépendance dans la philosophie féministe contemporaine, de la critique du fonctionnement du concept dans la rhétorique de l’État libéral aux modalités de son inclusion dans une théorie de la justice. Deux axes se dégagent, qui convergent dans une tentative de redéfinition de la notion d’autonomie : les relations de dépendance constituent le point de départ de l’éthique du « care » ou de la sollicitude, qu’il s’agira de présenter ici ; elles ont en outre suscité des reformulations importantes des théories de la justice sur la base d’une anthropologie politique qui cherche à prendre acte de la constitution relationnelle des agents moraux. L’enjeu de ces réflexions n’est donc pas simplement de réévaluer la notion de dépendance, mais aussi de fournir un fondement normatif à l’inclusion des personnes dépendantes dans la communauté morale et politique, voire d’élaborer une conception renouvelée de la citoyenneté.
-
« Contract and Domination offers a bold challenge to contemporary contract theory, arguing that it should either be fundamentally rethought or abandoned altogether. Since the publication of John Rawls's A Theory of Justice, contract theory has once again become central to the Western political tradition. But gender justice is neglected and racial justice almost completely ignored. Carole Pateman's and Charles Mills's earlier books, The Sexual Contract (1988) and The Racial Contract (1997), offered devastating critiques of gender and racial domination and the contemporary contract tradition's silence on them. Both books have become classics of revisionist radical democratic political theory. Now Pateman and Mills are collaborating for the first time in an interdisciplinary volume, drawing on their insights from political science and philosophy. They are building on but going beyond their earlier work to bring the sexual and racial contracts together. In Contract and Domination, Pateman and Mills discuss their differences about contract theory and whether it has a useful future; excavate the (white) settler contract that created new civil societies in North America and Australia; argue via a "non-ideal" contract for reparations to black Americans; confront the evasions of contemporary contract theorists; explore the intersections of gender and race and the global sexual-racial contract; and reply to their critics. »--Page 4 de la couverture.
-
Cet article analyse la stratégie du système onusien pour neutraliser les mouvements sociaux contestataires en les faisant « participer » à son projet de « bonne gouvernance » mondiale, à travers l’exemple du mouvement féministe latino-américain et des Caraïbes. En étudiant les « politiques de population » des institutions internationales et la question du micro-crédit pour les femmes, on voit comment l’ONU parvient à se présenter comme « alliée » des femmes et à embrigader dans son entreprise une partie du mouvement féministe, alors qu’elle applique des politiques désastreuses pour les femmes, en particulier pour les femmes pauvres du Sud.
-
Un examen de la révolution scientifique qui montre comment la vision mécaniste du monde de la science moderne a sanctionné l'exploitation de la nature, l'expansion commerciale sans retenue et un nouvel ordre socio-économique qui subordonne les femmes.